Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
DrugInjection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Other names: Traumeel, Zeel
NCT Number: NCT01887678
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined Traumeel® / Zeel® injection against placebo (saline) in patients with moderate-to-severe pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of Traumeel® and Zeel® co-administered intra-articular (IA) injections vs placebo IA injections on the change in knee pain in patients with moderate to severe knee pain associated with osteoarthritis.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate reduction of pain and stiffness and change in physical function.
Safety is evaluated by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during the treatment period and follow up period for all randomized patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(Screening Visit 1):
Exclusion criteria
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Other names: Traumeel, Zeel
Placebo is an injection of Saline
Other names: Saline
Time frame: from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess pain, scores from WOMAC Section A, items 1 to 5 are averaged to yield the Pain Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. A two-sided test of equality of the study drug (Traumeel®-Zeel®) and Placebo at level 0.05 was computed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and the corresponding Baseline value of the primary efficacy variable as a covariate. The test decision was based on the (two-sided) p-value for the corresponding test of no treatment difference.
Time frame: from Baseline to post-Baseline visits except End of Study Visit (up to day 105)
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess pain, scores from WOMAC Section A, items 1 to 5 are averaged to yield the Pain Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in pain subscore were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time frame: from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess stiffness, scores from WOMAC Section B, items 6 to 7 are averaged to yield the Stiffness Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in stiffness score were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time frame: from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess physical function, scores from WOMAC Section C, items 8 to 24 are averaged to yield the Physical Function Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in Physical Function subscore were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time frame: from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. A total WOMAC score was computed by averaging all 24 possible responses. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in total WOMAC score were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time frame: from Baseline (Day 1, predose)
Patients made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time frame: End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Patients made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, predose)
Study Physicians made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time frame: End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Study Physicians made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, predose) to post-Baseline visits (up to day 119)
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, predose) to post-Baseline visits (up to day 119)
Changes in time to walk 50 feet (seconds)
Time frame: Statistically derived
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. The time to 50% pain relief were statistical exercises and were analyzed for each individual patient from their self-assessment.
Time frame: Statistically derived
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. The time to 100% pain relief were statistical exercises and were analyzed for each individual patient from their self-assessment, however, the prevalence of 100% pain relief did not support an estimate for the median time. The number of patients who reached 100% pain relief is reported and the log rank test for difference in time to 100% pain relief was calculated for each injection.
Time frame: Statistically derived
Time to and use of rescue medication (acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day for breakthrough pain) as reported by the patients. Patients who used any rescue medication during the study.
Time frame: Statistically derived
Time to and use of rescue medication (acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day for breakthrough pain) (study population measure statistically derived). Total number of tablets taken as reported by patient.
Time frame: Start of Lead-In period until individual study end, up to 16 weeks.
Total number of patients affected.
Time frame: Starting at Visit 2/ Start of Lead-In period (Day 7 up to day 119)
Total number of patients affected.
Time frame: during the treatment period and follow up period (Days 11 to 119)
Total number of patients affected.
Time frame: All visits (Days 1 up to 119)
Total number of patients affected.
Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH
Industry
Multi-center Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Co-administered Traumeel® / Zeel® Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Pain With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Acronym: MOZArT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07364578
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03895489
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06693648
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06522906
Arthritis, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details