The Fifth Medical Center of PLA Ceneral Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 10071, China
NCT Number: NCT03116152
Efficacy and safety evaluation of IBI308 versus paclitaxel/irinotecan in patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after failure of first-line treatment: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 10071, China
Efficacy and safety evaluation of IBI308 versus paclitaxel/irinotecan in patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after failure of first-line treatment: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (ORIENT-2)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IBI308 200mg Intravenous drip every three weeks;
paclitaxel 175mg/㎡ Intravenous drip every three weeks or irinotecan 180mg/㎡ Intravenous drip every two weeks
Time frame: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS in all participants is presented.
Time frame: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Unequivocal progression of non-target leisions and the appearance of ≥1 new lesions were also considered as PD.
Time frame: Through Final Analysis data cut-off date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of randomized participants who achieved a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the RECIST1.1 criteria as per investigator assessment.
Time frame: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)
Duration of response (DoR) was defined as the time from the date of the first investigator-assessed response (CR or PR) to the date of subsequent investigator-assessed PD or death, whichever is earlier.
Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
Industry
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of IBI308 Versus Paclitaxel/Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Failure of First-line Treatment: a Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study (ORIENT-2)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06010303
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03322267
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07363629
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04045496
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Cancer
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details