Erythropoietin alfa
BiologicalPrefilled syringes of erythropoietin
NCT Number: NCT04036253
Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial. A study designed as phase III, in 120 patients with chronic renal failure in the pre-dialysis stage, evaluate efficacy and safety of Hemax PFS® (PFS: prefilled syringes) vs the innovator erythropoietin alfa product (Eprex®).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
CEMEDIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
This was a Phase IIIB, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to compare two products with epoetin alfa (HEMAX® PFS versus EPREX/ERYPO®).
This trial was open-label for both the patient and the investigator, but blinded in the performance of laboratory analyses.
The overall objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of HEMAX® PFS compared to EPREX/ERYPO®, following a dose-titration and maintenance scheme similar to the one used in the regular clinical practice.
All patients received HEMAX® PFS or EPREX/ERYPO® twice a week subcutaneously during 12 weeks of titration, switching then to an equivalent weekly dose during 12 additional maintenance weeks. During the dosing scheme switch from twice a week to once weekly, each patient continued receiving the treatment assigned at randomization.
The study conclude with n=43 patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the measured changes in levels of hemoglobin from baseline value to the mean value of the 8 to 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus EPREX/ ERYPO®.
Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the safety through the incidence of adverse events and adverse reactions asessed after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment (week 24 reported which includes those evaluated at week 12), comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the percentage of responder patients (increase of Hb ≥ 1g/ dl) after 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the percentage of transfusional requirements after 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
Time frame: Intragroup efficacy until week 12
Evaluate the efficacy between arms (HEMAX® PFS and EPREX/ ERYPO®) of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the change in the level of hemoglobin from baseline in every visit until the week 12 visit.
Time frame: Intragroup efficacy until week 24
Evaluate the efficacy between arms (HEMAX® PFS and EPREX/ ERYPO®) of the change from the twice - a - week doses in the titration phase to a weekly dose in the maintenance phase through the changes in the hemoglobin levels from week 12 to weeks 16, 20 and 24 of treatment
Time frame: 12 and 24 weeks of treatment
An anti-erythropoietin alfa antibody determination will be performed to evaluate treatment immunogenicity at week 12 and 24 visit
Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Hepcidin will be analyzed by ELISA at baseline, week 12 and 24 in order to evaluate the treatment response.
Bio Sidus SA
Industry
A Randomized, Comparative Study of HEMAX PFS® Versus EPREX/ ERYPO® in the Treatment of Anemia With Epoetin Alfa in Patients With Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05745883
Anemia, Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04543812
Anemia, Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04655027
Anemia, Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
Baotou, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04959578
Anemia, Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
View Trial Details