Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04036253

Study of HEMAX PFS Versus EPREX/ ERYPO® in Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial. A study designed as phase III, in 120 patients with chronic renal failure in the pre-dialysis stage, evaluate efficacy and safety of Hemax PFS® (PFS: prefilled syringes) vs the innovator erythropoietin alfa product (Eprex®).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This was a Phase IIIB, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to compare two products with epoetin alfa (HEMAX® PFS versus EPREX/ERYPO®).

This trial was open-label for both the patient and the investigator, but blinded in the performance of laboratory analyses.

The overall objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of HEMAX® PFS compared to EPREX/ERYPO®, following a dose-titration and maintenance scheme similar to the one used in the regular clinical practice.

All patients received HEMAX® PFS or EPREX/ERYPO® twice a week subcutaneously during 12 weeks of titration, switching then to an equivalent weekly dose during 12 additional maintenance weeks. During the dosing scheme switch from twice a week to once weekly, each patient continued receiving the treatment assigned at randomization.

The study conclude with n=43 patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients older than 18 years
  • Patients with pre-dialysis chronic renal failure (CRF) defined by a glomerular filtration rate (calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study formula) ≥15 ml/ min and <60 ml/ min, by 1.73 m2
  • Anemic patients that should be treated and levels of hemoglobin <10.5 g/dl and ≥ 7.5 g/dl.
  • Patients that have the will and capacity to sign a written inform consent.
  • Post-menopause women for at least 2 years, or sterile by surgery for at least 6 months. Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline and be willing to get an adequate method of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients that are planned to be on dialysis or have a renal transplant in the following 6 months.
  • Transferrin iron Saturation < 20%.
  • Etiology of renal failure (as secondary to autoimmune diseases) that, to the judge to the physician, can affect the normal development of the protocol.
  • Active bleeding or history of hemorrhage that have led to a significative decrease of hematocrit in the last 30 days.
  • Non-controlled hypertension (≥160 mm Hg of systolic pressure and/or ≥100 mm Hg of diastolic pressure with anti-hypertensive treatment).
  • Anemia caused by any other cause than renal disease.
  • Having a transfusion in the last 3 months before basal visit or during screening.
  • Treatment with an erythropoiesis stimulant in the last 3 months before basal visit or screening.
  • Increase risk of thromboembolic disease: history of arterial thromboembolia (stroke, transient ischemic attack, Acute coronary syndrome, etc.) in the last 6 months or venous in the last 12 months before screening; surgery in the last month before screening; prolong immobilization or orthopedic surgery programmed in the following 6 months or any other condition that to the judge of the investigator can increase the risk of thromboembolism.
  • Hematological disease or myelodysplastic syndrome or history of hematological neoplasm or solid tumor in the last 5 years.
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Refuse to participate in the protocol or any medical condition, that in the investigator opinion, is significant to prevent the participant from being included in the trial.

Treatment and study plan

Erythropoietin alfa

Biological

Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy Evaluation Through Change in Hemoglobin Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment

    Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the measured changes in levels of hemoglobin from baseline value to the mean value of the 8 to 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus EPREX/ ERYPO®.

  2. Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions (Safety and Tolerability) at Weeks 12 and 24.

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment

    Evaluate the safety through the incidence of adverse events and adverse reactions asessed after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment (week 24 reported which includes those evaluated at week 12), comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Responder Patients

    Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment

    Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the percentage of responder patients (increase of Hb ≥ 1g/ dl) after 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.

  2. Percentage of Patients That Required Any Transfusion

    Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment

    Evaluate the percentage of transfusional requirements after 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.

  3. Change of Hemoglobin Level at Week 12 of Treatment

    Time frame: Intragroup efficacy until week 12

    Evaluate the efficacy between arms (HEMAX® PFS and EPREX/ ERYPO®) of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the change in the level of hemoglobin from baseline in every visit until the week 12 visit.

  4. Evaluate the Efficacy Between Arms 24 Weeks: Week Doses in the Titration

    Time frame: Intragroup efficacy until week 24

    Evaluate the efficacy between arms (HEMAX® PFS and EPREX/ ERYPO®) of the change from the twice - a - week doses in the titration phase to a weekly dose in the maintenance phase through the changes in the hemoglobin levels from week 12 to weeks 16, 20 and 24 of treatment

  5. Incidence of Anti-drug Antibodies (Immunogenicity)

    Time frame: 12 and 24 weeks of treatment

    An anti-erythropoietin alfa antibody determination will be performed to evaluate treatment immunogenicity at week 12 and 24 visit

  6. Concentration of Hepcidin

    Time frame: 24 weeks of treatment

    Hepcidin will be analyzed by ELISA at baseline, week 12 and 24 in order to evaluate the treatment response.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bio Sidus SA

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Comparative Study of HEMAX PFS® Versus EPREX/ ERYPO® in the Treatment of Anemia With Epoetin Alfa in Patients With Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jul 29, 2019
Registry last updated
Mar 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.