Erenumab
BiologicalAdministered via subcutaneous injection.
Other names: AMG 334, Aimovig™
NCT Number: NCT01890109
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of moderate to severe daily hot flashes 4 weeks after a single dose of erenumab (AMG 334) in women with hot flashes associated with menopause.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 1
Research Site, San Diego, California, United States
This study will test the hypothesis that the vasodilation associated with capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow (DBF) provides a good model for the vasodilation associated with hot flashes; therefore erenumab doses that cause DBF inhibition will be safe and well tolerated, and will be effective in the reduction of the frequency and/or severity of HFs.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administered via subcutaneous injection.
Other names: AMG 334, Aimovig™
Administered via subcutaneous injection
Time frame: Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)
The severity of hot flashes was assessed by participants based on the following categories:
Baseline (BL) number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day -7 to day 1 predose based on geometric mean, and the week 4 number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day 21 to day 27 based on geometric mean.
The ratio of week 4 to BL was used to assess change from BL to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[BL]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
Time frame: Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)
The daily severity score was calculated according to the following:
(Number of mild hot flashes * 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes * 2) + (number of severe hot flashes * 3).
The baseline daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day -7 to day 1 predose, and the week 4 daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day 21 to day 27.
The ratio of week 4 to baseline (week 4 / baseline) was used to assess change from baseline to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[baseline]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
Time frame: 16 weeks
A treatment-emergent adverse event is any adverse event that began or worsened after the initial dose of study drug and before the end of study.
A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:
Time frame: Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Blood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated analytical procedure.
Time frame: Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Time frame: Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Time frame: Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Time frame: Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Time frame: 16 weeks
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidal ideation during the study based on the following Yes/No questions:
Time frame: 16 weeks
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to detect antibodies capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab.
A participant was defined as positive for developing anti-erenumab antibodies if they were binding antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
Amgen
Industry
Randomized, Stratified, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of AMG 334 in Women With Hot Flashes Associated With Menopause
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06957691
Adenocarcinoma, Androgen Ablative Therapy of Advanced Hormone-dependent Prostate Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07695051
Hot Flashes, Menopause
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06049797
Hot Flashes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06206421
Hot Flashes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial Details