Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05192941

Study of Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Quality of Life of Inclisiran (KJX839) vs Placebo, on Top of Ongoing Individually Optimized Lipid-lowering Therapy, in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia

Study of efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life of inclisiran (KJX839) vs placebo, on top of ongoing individually optimized lipid-lowering therapy, in participants with hypercholesterolemia

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study in adult participants with very high or high cardiovascular risk who did not meet their individual LDL-C target despite being treated with their individual maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a statin, and if applicable, further Lipid-Lowering Therapy (LLT).

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of inclisiran compared to placebo, both on top of ongoing individually optimized LLT, on reaching a participant's LDL-C target (< 55 mg/dL or < 70 mg/dL, depending on the cardiovascular risk category), according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias as well as on patient-relevant safety, tolerability outcomes and quality of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

Participants eligible for inclusion in this study must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
  • Male or female participants ≥18 years of age.
  • Participants categorized as very high or high CV risk, as defined below:

•Very high risk participants with at least one of the following: A. Documented Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) i) Acute Coronary Syndrome: Unstable angina or myocardial infarction ii) Stable angina iii) Unequivocally documented ASCVD upon prior imaging v) Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) vi) Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) B. Diabetes mellitus (DM) with target organ damage (defined as microalbuminuria, retinopathy, or neuropathy), or at least ≥ 3 major risk factors, or early onset of Type 1 DM of long duration (> 20 years) C. A calculated SCORE2 ≥ 7.5% for age < 50 years; SCORE2 ≥ 10% for age 50-69 years; SCORE2-OP ≥ 15% for age ≥ 70 years to estimate 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD D. Pre-existing diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) with ASCVD or with another major risk factor.

OR

•High risk participants with at least one of the following: A. Markedly elevated single risk factors, in particular total cholesterol > 310 mg/dL, LDL-C > 190 mg/dL, or blood pressure ≥ 180/110 mmHg B. Pre-existing diagnosis of HeFH without other major risk factors C. DM without target organ damage (defined as microalbuminuria, retinopathy, or neuropathy), with DM duration ≥ 10 years or other additional risk factor D. Moderate chronic kidney disease (eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2) E. A calculated SCORE2 2.5 to <7.5% for age under 50 years; SCORE2 5 to <10% for age 50-69 years; SCORE2-OP 7.5 to <15% for age ≥70 years to estimate 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD as defined by the cardiovascular risk categories in the 2019 ESC/EAS guideline (Mach et al 2020)

  • LDL-C levels:
  • in participants with very high cardiovascular risk: serum LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL
  • in participants with high cardiovascular risk: serum LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL
  • Participant on a stable dose of a statin for ≥ 30 days.
  • Up to approximately 20% of total participants can be on a stable dose (for ≥ 30 days prior to screening) of another LLT on top of statin such as a cholesterol absorbing inhibitor or a bile acid sequestrant, or alternatively, an adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor, as indicated.
  • Fasting triglyceride < 400 mg/dL.

At Baseline:

  • Fasting triglyceride < 400 mg/dL.
  • Before randomization, despite being treated with the individual MTD of a statin for ≥ 30 days and, if applicable, with another LLT on top of statin (stable for ≥ 30 days),
  • in participants with very high cardiovascular risk: serum LDL-C ≥ 55mg/dL.
  • in participants with high cardiovascular risk: serum LDL-C ≥ 70mg/dL.

Key Exclusion Criteria: Participants meeting any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study.

  • Severe concomitant non-CV disease that is expected to reduce life expectancy to less than 2 years at screening or baseline visit.
  • Participants on more than one other lipid-lowering drug on top of statin at screening visit.
  • Pre-existing diagnosis of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia at screening or baseline visit.
  • Secondary hypercholesterolemia, e.g. hypothyroidism or nephrotic syndrome at screening or baseline visit.
  • Previous (within 90 days of screening), current or planned treatment with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed towards PCSK9 (e.g. evolocumab, alirocumab) at screening or baseline visit.
  • Previous exposure to inclisiran or any other non-mAb PCSK9 targeted therapy, either as an investigational or marketed drug within 2 years prior to screening or baseline visit.
  • Previous, current or planned treatment with LDL-apheresis at screening or baseline visit.
  • Participants with known intolerance to rosuvastatin at screening or baseline visit.
  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments, inclisiran or rosuvastatin, or its excipients or to drugs of similar chemical classes at screening or baseline visit.
  • Participants taking gemfibrozil at screening or baseline visit.
  • Liver and CK: (a) Active liver disease defined as any current infectious, neoplastic, or metabolic pathology of the liver or (b) unexplained alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation >3x ULN, or total bilirubin elevation > 2x ULN (except for participants with Gilbert's syndrome), or (c) creatine kinase (CK) >5x ULN at screening or baseline visit.
  • Participant with severe renal impairment defined by eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 as calculated by the Modification in Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at screening or baseline visit.
  • Acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke or TIA, coronary revascularization or peripheral arterial revascularization procedure or amputation due to atherosclerotic disease < 3 months prior to the screening or baseline visit.
  • Planned or expected cardiac, cerebrovascular or peripheral artery surgery or coronary revascularization within the study duration.
  • Heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV at screening or baseline visit.
  • History of malignancy that required surgery (excluding local and wide-local excision), radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy (excluding systemic adjuvant therapies given to prevent cancer recurrence eg: hormonotherapy for prostate or breast cancer) during the 3 years prior to screening or baseline visit.
  • Participant with myopathy at screening or baseline visit.
  • Participant receiving concomitant ciclosporin at screening or baseline visit.
  • Participants that are predisposed to the development of renal failure secondary to rhabdomyolysis (e.g. sepsis, hypotension, major surgery, trauma, severe metabolic, endocrine and electrolyte disorders; or uncontrolled seizures).
  • Participants with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose-malabsorption.
  • Unwillingness or inability (e.g. physical or cognitive) to comply with study procedures (including study visits, fasting blood draws and compliance with study treatment regimens), and medication administration (injections) and schedule. Participant should be able and willing to read, understand and answer questionnaires.
  • Any surgical or medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, may place the participant at higher risk from his/her participation in the study, or is likely to prevent the participant from complying with the requirements of the study or completing the study at screening or baseline visit.
  • Use of other investigational drugs within 5 half-lives, 30 days or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline (e.g. biologics), whichever is longer or longer if required by local regulation, prior to screening visit.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women at screening or baseline visit.
  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception while taking study treatment, which includes rosuvastatin, and for 5 days (= 5 times the terminal half-life of rosuvastatin) after stopping medication. Highly effective contraception methods include:
  • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
  • Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
  • Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female participants on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that participant.
  • Use of oral, (estrogen and progesterone), injected, or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate < 1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception.

In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.

Women are considered post-menopausal if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate history of vasomotor symptoms). Women are considered not of child bearing potential if they are post-menopausal or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessments and she is considered not of child bearing potential.

If local regulations deviate from the contraception methods listed above to prevent pregnancy, local regulations apply and will be described in the local ICF.

Treatment and study plan

Inclisiran Sodium

Drug

Subcutaneously injected on Day 1, Day 90, and Day 270

Other names: KJX839

Placebo

Drug

Placebo to inclisiran 300 mg subcutaneously

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Achieving Individual LDL-C Target (<55 mg/dL or <70 mg/dL)

    Time frame: Day 90

    Number of participants achieving individual Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) target (< 55 mg/dL or < 70 mg/dL) at Day 90. The individual LDL-C target of the participants was determined according to their most recent individual cardiovascular risk category. A larger proportion of participants indicates a superior outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relative Change From Baseline to Mean LDL-C Level Over the Double-blind Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

    Relative (percentage) change from baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) level averaged over the double-blind treatment period

  2. Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Muscle-related Adverse Event From Day 1 to Day 360

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 360

    The number of participants who experienced at least one muscle-related adverse event, defined as Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) rhabdomyolysis / myopathy from Day 1 to Day 360. All muscle-related adverse events occurring between first dose of double-blind treatment and earliest date out of visit Day 360, death date and last contact date are considered.

  3. Number of Participants Experiencing Self-reported Pain

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 360

    Self-reported pain is reported at its worst in the last 24 h on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Days with a score of 0 are considered as days without pain.

    The percentage of days with pain for each participant is calculated as number of days with pain divided by the total number of days where diary was completed, multiplied by 100.

    Diary data between the first dose of double-blind treatment up to the minimum of last contact date and Day 360 visit are considered.

  4. Annualized Number of Days With Pain

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 360

    Annualized rate refers to the estimated number of days with pain per year.

    Self-reported pain is reported at its worst in the last 24 h on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Days with a score of 0 are considered as days without pain.

  5. Average Absolute Change From Baseline in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Severity Score Over the Double-blind Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

    The Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete.

    The pain severity score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 4 items in the pain severity domain (questionnaire items number 3, 4, 5, 6). The derived pain severity score ranged between 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), with larger values indicating a higher level of pain severity (worse outcome).

    If there was missing data for a participant and the available data was more than 50% for the corresponding domain (3 of 4 [pain severity] ), the missing items were imputed using the mean score of the non-missing item scores.

  6. Average Absolute Change From Baseline in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Interference Score Over the Double-blind Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

    The Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete.

    The pain interference score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 7 items in the pain interference domain (questionnaire items number 9A through 9G). The derived pain interference score ranged between 0 (does not interfere) and 10 (completely interferes), with larger values indicating a higher level of pain interference (worse outcome).

    If there was missing data for a participant and the available data was more than 50% for the corresponding domain (4 of 7 [pain interference] ), the missing items were imputed using the mean score of the non-missing item scores.

  7. Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Change in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Severity Score From Baseline to Day 360.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

    The Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete.

    The pain severity score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 4 items in the pain severity domain (questionnaire items number 3, 4, 5, 6). The derived pain severity score ranged between 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), with larger values indicating a higher level of pain severity (worse outcome). A clinically relevant change is defined by a reduction from baseline in SF-BPI pain severity score by at least 2 points.

    If there was missing data for a participant and the available data was more than 50% for the corresponding domain (3 of 4 [pain severity] ), the missing items were imputed using the mean score of the non-missing item scores.

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Change in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Interference Score From Baseline to Day 360

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

    The SF-BPI is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete.

    The pain interference score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 7 items in the pain interference domain (questionnaire items number 9A through 9G). The derived pain interference score ranged between 0 (does not interfere) and 10 (completely interferes), with larger values indicating a higher level of pain interference (worse outcome). A clinically relevant change is defined by a reduction from baseline in SF-BPI pain interference score by at least 2 points.

    If there was missing data for a participant and the available data was more than 50% for the corresponding domain (4 of 7 [pain interference] ), the missing items were imputed using the mean score of the non-missing item scores.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Quality of Life of Ongoing Individually Optimized Lipid-lowering Therapy With or Without Inclisiran (KJX839) - a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Multicenter Phase IV Study in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia

Acronym: V-DIFFERENCE

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 14, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.