Bimagrumab
DrugBimagrumab was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Other names: BYM338
NCT Number: NCT02152761
The purpose of this study was to assess if bimagrumab is safe and effective in patients with muscle wasting (atrophy) after hip fracture surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Novartis Investigative Site, Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Must have X-ray confirmed successful hip fracture repair; Must have completed surgical wound healing; Ability to walk a specified distance with or without a walking aid; Must weigh at least 35 kg.
Exclusion criteria
Must not have history of any other lower limb fractures in the past 6 months; Must not have certain cardiovascular conditions; Must not have a chronic active infection (e.g. HIV, hepatitis B or C, etc); Must not have used high-dose corticosteroid medications for at least 3 months in the past year;
Bimagrumab was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Other names: BYM338
Matching placebo was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Time frame: baseline, weeks 12 and 24
Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) of change from baseline in total LBM (kg) by treatment and visit To assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab and facilitate an adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without the need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least three doses were required, ranging from a non-effective or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy is expected. Original study was initiated with only two doses of bimagrumab, therefore, a lower dose arm of 70mg has been added to this study with Amendment 2, changing the randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, bimagrumab 210mg, or bimagrumab 700mg. Since the 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy and fewer patients were randomized to this group, it was used only for dose response modelling and not for hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluations for the bimagrumab 70mg Arm were performed
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) of change from baseline in derived gait speed (m/sec) by treatment and visit
To assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab and facilitate an adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without the need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least 3 doses were required, ranging from a non-effective or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy is expected. Original study was initiated with only two doses of bimagrumab, therefore, a lower dose arm of 70mg was added to this study with Amendment 2, changing the randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, bimagrumab 210mg, or bimagrumab 700mg. Since the 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy and fewer patients were randomized to this group, it was used only for dose response modelling and not for hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluations for the bimagrumab 70mg Arm were performed
Time frame: Week 24
MMRM change from baseline in total score by treatment & visit to Week 24 in physical performance measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) that evaluates lower extremity function. Score range is 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best) to assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab & facilitate adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least 3 doses were required, ranging from non- or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy was expected. Original study was initiated with only 2 doses, therefore, lower 70mg arm was added to this study, changing randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, 210mg, or 700mg. Since 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy, fewer patients were randomized to this group & it was used only for dose response modelling & not hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluation for 70mg were performed
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Group falls rate
The frequency of having at least one fall up to Week 48 was summarized by treatment groups
Incidence of falls was calculated for each arm up to Week 48. The ratio of these fall rates versus Placebo were calculated and presented as the Falls Rate Ratio. As mentioned in comment 5.1 above, the Falls Rate Ratio for Placebo does not apply because it would entail comparing the group to itself
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A 24-week Double-blind Treatment and 24-week Follow-up, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Phase IIa/IIb Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of i.v. Bimagrumab on Total Lean Body Mass and Physical Performance in Patients After Surgical Treatment of Hip Fracture
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05156320
Anti-myostatin, Atrophy
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03921528
Atrophy, Central Nervous System Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04131712
Atrophy, Muscle Atrophy
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02495727
Atrophy, Muscular Atrophy
Bath, Avon, United Kingdom
View Trial Details