DA-9801 300mg
Drug300 mg of DA-9801 in tablet form, 100 mg to be taken 3 times daily for 12 weeks.
NCT Number: NCT01822925
To evaluate the effectiveness of DA-9801 at 300mg, 600mg, 900mg and placebo, in reducing pain in subjects with diabetic neuropathic pain compared to their baseline values.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Center for United Research, Inc., Lakewood, California, United States
This is a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, dose ranging, placebo-controlled study where eligible subjects (age 18 to 75 years) will have an average pain score ≥ 4 on an 11-point Likert numerical rating scale (NRS) for at least four days each week prior to randomization as assessed by daily pain diaries. Eligible subjects will be randomized to a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 300mg, 600mg, 900mg of DA-9801, or placebo three times a day for 12 weeks. During and at the end of the 12-week treatment period subjects will be evaluated for safety and efficacy parameters. A follow-up visit for safety will occur two weeks after the last treatment visit (TV).
The Screening Phase (2 weeks) is designed to determine whether subjects are eligible to proceed to the Treatment Phase of the study and consists of a series of screening assessments designed to determine eligibility. Eligible subjects will undergo a two-week washout period for medications and therapies administered for pain management.
At or up to 21 days before the Screening Visit, written informed consent from (ICF) the subject will be obtained by the Investigator or a suitably qualified designee before the performance of any protocol specific procedure. At the Screening Visit, the subject will be issued a daily diary in order to record daily pain level during the screening phase.
The Treatment Phase (TV0 to TV12) begins with a series of assessments designed to confirm the subjects' continued eligibility. The site will collect the daily diary and the subject's pain score will be determined. Only subjects whose average pain score is ≥ 4 for at least four days each week will be randomized to any of the four treatment groups.
DA-9801 administration schedule is three times per day, starting from TV0 to TV12.
During this study phase subjects will be evaluated on a weekly basis. Efficacy evaluations each week will include the subject's global impression of improvement and CGI of pain. Safety evaluations during the Treatment Phase will consist of adverse event assessments at each visit.
The Follow-up Visit (two weeks after last TV) The Follow-up Visit is designed to assess safety and will occur 14 days after the last TV. If the subject is withdrawn from the study prior to TV12, the subject should be exited from the study AFTER completing the specified assessments for that visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
d) Post-menopausal: 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) levels > 40mIU/m, OR; e) 6 weeks post surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy, OR; f) Are using one or more of the following acceptable methods of contraception: surgical sterilization, hormonal contraception, and double-barrier methods. Reliable contraception should be maintained throughout the study and for 7 days after study discontinuation.
300 mg of DA-9801 in tablet form, 100 mg to be taken 3 times daily for 12 weeks.
600 mg of DA-9801 in tablet form, 200 mg to be taken 3 times daily for 12 weeks.
900 mg of DA-9801 in tablet form, to be taken 300 mg to be taken 3 times daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo, in tablet form, to be taken 3 times daily for 12 weeks. The placebo is the same formulation as DA-9801 except that it does not contain the active pharmaceutical ingredient.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
Pain score was assessed by the subject using the 11-point Likert rating scale for pain (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain) prior to conduct of any other study assessment. The change in clinic visit pain score at the 12-week visit was compared to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and over 12 week treatment period
Pain intensity was assessed by the subject before any other protocol procedures at baseline and at the 12- week visit using an 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain) (Negative values indicate percentage reductions).
Time frame: Baseline to 12 week treatment period
Pain intensity was assessed by the subject before any other protocol procedures at baseline and week 12 based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain).
The number of participants who had achieved ≥ a 30% reduction in pain from the baseline was to be compared between the treatment groups and placebo.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 week treatment period
Average 24-hour pain intensity was assessed daily based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Average weekly pain scores are defined as 7* [(Pain Day 1 + Pain Day 2 + …+ Pain Day n)]/n where n is the number of available diary entries for the week. The minimum pain score for a week would be 0 and the maximum would be 70.
Difference in the average weekly pain score at Week 12 is the score for each week minus the baseline .
Time frame: Baseline to 12 week treatment period
Most severe 24-hour pain intensity was assessed daily based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Average weekly most severe pain scores are defined as 7* [(Pain Day 1 + Pain Day 2 + …+ Pain Day n)]/n where n is the number of available diary entries for the week. The minimum possible pain score for a week would be 0 and the maximum possible would be 70.
Difference in the average weekly pain score at Week 12 is the score at each week minus baseline .
Time frame: Baseline to 12 week treatment period
Overnight pain intensity was assessed daily based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Average weekly overnight pain scores are defined as 7* [(Pain Day 1 + Pain Day 2 + …+ Pain Day n)]/n where n is the number of available diary entries for the week. The minimum possible pain score for a week would be 0 and the maximum possible would be 70.
Difference in the average weekly overnight pain score at Week 12 is the score at each week minus baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 12 week treatment period
Average weekly pain intensity was assessed daily based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Average weekly pain scores are defined as 7* [(Pain Day 1 + Pain Day 2 + …+ Pain Day n)]/n where n is the number of available diary entries for the week. The minimum possible pain score for a week would be 0 and the maximum possible would be 70.
Difference in the average weekly pain score at Week 12 is the score at each week minus baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 week treatment period
Overnight pain intensity was assessed daily based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Average weekly overnight pain scores are defined as 7* [(Pain Day 1 + Pain Day 2 + …+ Pain Day n)]/n where n is the number of available diary entries for the week. The minimum possible pain score for a week would be 0 and the maximum possible would be 70.
Difference in the average weekly overnight pain score at Week 12 is the score at each week minus baseline
Time frame: Week 12
PGI measures the subject's overall improvement in pain. The assessment was to be completed each week during the Treatment Phase.
Global impression of improvement was assessed by the subject based on a 7 point scale (1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4-no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse, 7-very much worse.
Responders are defined as subjects with response of "very much improved", "much improved" or "minimally improved"
Time frame: Week 12
CGI measures global severity of illness at a given point of time and the improvement from baseline. The assessment was to be completed by the Investigator at baseline and each week during the treatment phase.
CGI responders were defined as subjects achieving a score of: (1): Very much improved or (2): Much improved or (3): Minimally improved on the clinician-rated CGI global improvement item.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12
During the Treatment Periods, subjects taking 500 mg acetaminophen or Tylenol® for severe pain recorded the frequency and dosage in the daily diary. The use of 500 mg acetaminophen or Tylenol® was recorded for Morning, Afternoon or Evening time. For each subject, the total weekly rescue medication was calculated, and it was used to assess average weekly rescue medication use.
NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Industry
A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Dose-Ranging, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety And Effectiveness Of DA-9801 in the Treatment of Subjects With Diabetic Neuropathy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07436585
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT00238550
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02068027
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02643251
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Glendale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details