Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01804725

Study of Bicycle Seat Effects on Male Perineal Blood Flow

The objective is to study the effects of bicycle riding and bicycle seats on blood flow to a man's reproductive organs. It has been shown that bicycle riding can affect a man's ability to have an erection. Each year, newer and better bicycle seats come out but these seats have not been adequately studied for their effects on blood flow in the genital region.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

About this study

Introduction:

An independent market research company released a report in 1997, estimating the bicycling industry to be worth an astounding 4.5 billion dollars.(1) The magnitude of this number gives us an idea of the popularity of this sport. An important component of a bicycle is its saddle, which can affect comfort, performance, and the rider's health. Several studies have reported sexual side effects in male bicyclists, more specifically temporary genital numbness and erectile dysfunction. Goldstein et. al claimed in their article that prolonged pressure on the perineal region causes arterial damage resulting in erectile dysfunction in men. These results have triggered bike manufacturers to come up with various saddle designs that claim to reduce risks for men. For this project investigators want to correlate bike riding and its effects on the male reproductive organs by measuring the pressures exerted on the perineum and blood flow while cycling. Previous studies on this matter have shown that a higher percentage of bicyclists are effected by Erectile Dysfunction(ED) compared to the general population. There are many published studies on the hemodynamics of the penis using Pulse Oximetry, Doppler Ultrasound and CAPSV measurements. Investigators goal is to be able to measure the pressures exerted on the arteries supplying the penis via the saddle over the perineum. A study, which attempted to carry out a measurement similar to this, used pressure transducers placed on the saddle of a stationary bike. There are flaws in this study, which investigators want to improve upon in designing this research experiment. For example, placing the sensors on the saddle enables measurements of force on the saddle and does not directly relate to the pressures exerted on the perineum. In other words by placing the sensors on the saddle researchers will not be able to distinguish between the pressures exerted on the perineum and other body parts in contact with the sensors on the seat, such as the sit bones. Also, while using a stationary bike the physics of the body and forces on the perineum are very different compared to road bikes on the road and mountain bikes on rough terrain. Investigators study corrects these flaws.

Purpose of study:

Can investigators measure the blood flow to the perineum via the perineal arteries and see the effect of bicycle riding on the blood flow through these arteries?

Design:

This is a pilot study which involved 2 steps to determine perineal blood flow and how bicycle seats affect this flow. The first step will be to use doppler ultrasound to measure the perineal blood flow in the Ultrasound suite of the University Illinois Chicago Medical Center. At this visit, patients will be asked to lie down in a frog-leg/lithotomy position on an exam table to allow access to the perineum. The linear ultrasound probe (L12-55) will be used to measure the flow through the perineal/cavernosal arteries. By applying sequentially increasing pressure, the critical pressure for occlusion will be measured along with flow rates at various applied perineal pressures. The second step will involve a bicycle ride where perineal pressures will be measured. Investigators use disposable sensors and tegaderm to stick the sensors on the perineum. No shaving of the perineum will be required so long as the sensor is able to be secured. The recording device is credit card size and will attach to the bicycle. The subjects ride using six different bike seats in a standard road course and also on a stationary trainer. This will conclude the requirement of the patient. The pressures obtained on the bicycle ride will be compared to the critical occlusion pressures and flow-pressure relationships measured in the ultrasound suite.

Recruitment:

Patients will be recruited for the project via various bicycle meetings. Cyclist will be approached via oral presentation and they will be men between ages 18-64, avid cyclists and will not be at risk of undue influence (i.e. UIC students). Please see attached recruitment script.

Risks Involved:

The study involves minimal risk to the subject as the subject will already be a cyclist and will be used to the mild exercise involved of cycling. Sensors will not use any electric input and the patient is at no harm from them. All data will be acquired using noninvasive radiology, ultrasound with doppler.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy 18-64 male

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Arteries occluding time for each seat

    Time frame: two years

    This measure indicates the time period the subjects are occluding their blood vessels in the perineal region. Different seats can occlude the arteries for different duration. So this measure tells us exactly what is the impact of each tested seat on male perineal blood flow.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Phase 1: To Compare Perineal Artery Occlusion in Road and Stationary Models. Phase 2: To Test Different Seats for Perineal Arterial Occlusion.

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 5, 2013
Registry last updated
Oct 25, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.