B/F/TAF
DrugTablets administered orally without regard to food
Other names: Biktarvy ®
NCT Number: NCT06104306
The goal of this clinical study is to learn how safe it is to switch to an oral therapy of Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (B/F/TAF) from Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) in participants living with virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), meaning participants with HIV RNA levels below detectable levels.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of switching to B/F/TAF in virologically suppressed participants unable/unwilling to continue on CAB+RPV intramuscular (IM) injections or wishing to switch to oral therapy through Week 12.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Hamilton Health Sciences-SIS Clinic, Hamilton, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Other names: Biktarvy ®
Time frame: Week 12
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AE that began on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the date of last dose of study drug plus 30 days or any AE leading to study drug discontinuation. The severity of AEs were be graded using the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicity Grading Scale.
The DAIDS grading table provide an adverse events (AE) severity grading scale ranging from grades 1 to 5 with descriptions for each AE based on the following general guidelines:
Time frame: Week 12
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increased at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any time after baseline up to and including the date of last dose of study drug plus 30 days.
The DAIDS Toxicity Grading Scale, Version 2.1 was used to assign toxicity grades (0 to 4) to laboratory results for analysis. Grade 0 included all values that did not meet the criteria for an abnormality of at least Grade 1. Grade 1 mild, Grade 2 moderate, Grade 3 severe, and Grade 4 potentially life-threatening.
Time frame: Day 1 (Predose)
Time frame: Week 4 (at trough and 2 hours postdose)
Time frame: Week 12 (at trough and 2 hours postdose)
Time frame: Week 24 (at trough and 2 hours postdose)
Time frame: Week 12
This outcome measure analyzed using the Missing = Excluded (M = E) method. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the analysis.
Time frame: Week 24
This outcome measure analyzed using the Missing = Excluded (M = E) method. In this approach, all missing data were excluded in the analysis.
Time frame: Week 12
This outcome measure was analyzed using the Discontinuation = Failure (D = F) method. In this approach, all discontinuation were treated as HIV-1 RNA >= 50 copies/mL (failure) in the analysis.
Time frame: Week 24
This outcome measure was analyzed using the Discontinuation = Failure (D = F) method. In this approach, all discontinuation were treated as HIV-1 RNA >= 50 copies/mL (failure) in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 12 Weeks
Time frame: Up to 24 Weeks
Time frame: Week 24
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increased at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any time after baseline up to and including the date of last dose of study drug plus 30 days.
The DAIDS Toxicity Grading Scale, Version 2.1 was used to assign toxicity grades (0 to 4) to laboratory results for analysis. Grade 0 included all values that did not meet the criteria for an abnormality of at least Grade 1. Grade 1 mild, Grade 2 moderate, Grade 3 severe, and Grade 4 potentially life-threatening.
Time frame: Week 4
The HIVTSQc was a 1-12 items questionnaire. Each item was scored -3 to 3. The total score ranged from -33 to +33, based on 11 items. Higher the score, greater the improvement in satisfaction with treatment; the lower the score, the greater the deterioration in satisfaction with treatment. A score of 0 represented no change.
Gilead Sciences
Industry
A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Oral B/F/TAF After Discontinuing Injectable CAB + RPV
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05601128
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05471076
HIV-1-infection
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05405582
Communicable Diseases, Disease Attributes
Somkele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
View Trial DetailsNCT04067869
Cytomegalovirus Infections, DNA Virus Infections
Bordeaux, France
View Trial Details