Bendamustine
DrugOther names: Treakisym, Ribomustin, Levact, Treanda, SDX-105
NCT Number: NCT00877006
The primary objective of the study is to compare the complete response (CR) rate of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with that of standard treatment regimens of either rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with advanced, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Teva Investigational Site 315, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Other names: Treakisym, Ribomustin, Levact, Treanda, SDX-105
Other names: Rituxan, MabThera, Zytux
Other names: Oncovin
Other names: Endoxan, Cytoxan, Neosar, Procytox, Revimmune
Other names: Adriamycin
Time frame: 6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
CR=complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, if present pretherapy; protocol-specified positron emission tomography (PET) scan assessment criteria; (if the spleen and/or liver were enlarged on the basis of physical examination and/or anatomic imaging before treatment) the liver and/or spleen were considered normal size on physical examination and by anatomic imaging after therapy, with disappearance of all nodules related to lymphoma; (if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment) the infiltrate must have cleared on subsequent bone marrow biopsies.
Time frame: 6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
Overall Response=participants with Complete Remission (CR) + those with Partial Remission (PR). CR=see Outcome Measure 1 for details. PR= at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the product of the greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes/masses; at least a 50% decrease in the SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules in their greatest transverse diameter; no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, and other nodes; no measurable disease in organs other than the liver or spleen; no new sites of disease; protocol-specified PET scan and bone marrow criteria.
Time frame: 32 weeks
AE=any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity after dispensation of the study drug and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended physical sign, symptom, or laboratory parameter that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study, or significant worsening of the disease under study (or any concurrent disease), whether or not considered related to the study drug. AEs were graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). SAE=an adverse event occurring at any dose that results in: death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of one's ability to conduct normal life functions), a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event.
Time frame: 32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)
Clinical laboratory data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for serum chemistry test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and laboratory test across all cycles).
Time frame: 32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, weekly during treatment, and at the end-of-treatment visit)
Hematology test data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for hematology test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and hematology test across all cycles).
Time frame: 32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 32
Participants were weighed at Baseline and at Endpoint (Week 32); those participants with an increase or decrease of >=10% were considered potentially clinically significant.
Time frame: Week 32
Participants' ECOG Performance Status was evaluated at the end of treatment as improved, stayed the same, or worsened from baseline (see Baseline Characteristics for ECOG Performance Status).
Time frame: prior to start of treatment
Time frame: 32 weeks
Time frame: Day 1 (prior to treatment), 32 weeks
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). This outcome reports the global health status on a scale of 0-100 with a high score for the global health status/QOL represents a high quality of life.
Time frame: Treatment Period: 18-32 weeks Long-Term Follow-up Period: up to 5 years after the Treatment Period
Relapsed disease (after CR) and progressive disease (PD) (after PR or SD):
Time frame: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to treatment failure, disease progression or relapse, other malignancies, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve a CR or PR after 6 cycles of treatment. If a patient failed to achieve CR or PR by the time of data analysis or early withdrawal, the treatment failure date was set at 126 days (6 cycles of treatment) after randomization or the new anticancer treatment date, whichever is earlier.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
DOR was defined as the time from first response (CR or PR) to disease progression or relapse, or death due to any cause.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: Treatment Period: 18-32 weeks Long-Term Follow-up Period: up to 5 years after the Treatment Period
Death is due to any cause. Data are broken out by patients who died within 30 days of the last dose of study medications, and those who died greater than 30 days of the last dose of study medications.
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Industry
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01456351
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Giessen, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02507336
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03188965
Advanced Solid Tumor, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00571493
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial Details