Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01787604

Study of Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure

Authors hypothesize that aortic root reimplantation procedure is superior over standard aortic valve reimplantation procedure in the incidence of aortic valve replacement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Meshalkin State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology

Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia

About this study

A single blind prospective randomized superiority study is conducted. Our hypothesis is that there is difference in the incidence of aortic valve replacement between the standard aortic valve reimplantation procedure and aortic root reimplantation procedure more than 21.1%. If there is truly difference between groups (Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure and Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure), then total 64 patients for both groups are required to be 80% sure that the upper limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval would reveal a difference in favour of the Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure of 21.1%. The blinding process is applied to a patient, who is informed about received valve-sparing operation, but don't know the type of the last. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board. Depending on a type of the procedure, the patients are divided into two groups: Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure group includes 32 patients and Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure group consists of 32 patients. Randomization is conducted intraoperatively by using accidental sampling after examining the aortic valve and making a decision on the possibility of a valve-sparing operation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aortic insufficiency 2+
  • Ascending aorta or aortic root of greater than 4.5 cm (> 4.0 cm in Marfan syndrome)
  • Good conditions of aortic cusps

Exclusion criteria

  • Aortic annulus more than 32 mm
  • Aortic cusps destruction
  • Critical aortic cusps elongation
  • Aortic root dissection

Treatment and study plan

Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure

Procedure

Modified Florida Sleeve.

Other names: Modified Florida Sleeve.

Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure

Procedure

David I

Other names: David I

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom From Aortic Insufficiency More Than 2+ (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier)

    Time frame: up to 4 yeras

    Estimated percentage of participants free from aortic insufficiency (AI) more than 2+ measured by echocardiography for a 4 years after treatment..

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival (Percentage, Kaplan-Meier)

    Time frame: up to 4 yeras

    Estimated percentage of alive participants for 4 years after treatment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation

Network

Registry information

Official study title

Superiority Trial of Aortic Root Reimplantation Procedure Versus Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure

Acronym: STAR

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Feb 8, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.