Placebo
DrugNormal saline
NCT Number: NCT03336866
This study evaluates the ability of IXT-m200 to change methamphetamine concentrations in blood and alter the way methamphetamine feels. Participants will receive either placebo, a low or high dose of IXT-m200, in addition to methamphetamine challenge doses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Anaheim Clinical Trials, Anaheim, California, United States
IXT-m200 is a monoclonal antibody that binds to methamphetamine in the blood. The main purpose of this study is to look at the effects of IXT-m200 on the pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine and on methamphetamine liking effects. Additionally, the study will determine IXT-m200 pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability in subjects with methamphetamine use disorder. Qualified subjects will receive a single dose of IXT-m200 followed by up to 4 methamphetamine challenge doses.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Normal saline
IXT-m200 is an anti-methamphetamine monoclonal antibody
Other names: ch-mAb7F9
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
METH AUCinf following IXT-m200 dosing on each METH Challenge Day.
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
METH Cmax following IXT-m200 dosing on each METH Challenge Day.
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for CRAVE over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for DISLIKE over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for FEEL over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for GOOD over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for HIGH over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for LIKE over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for MORE over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: Day 1, 5, 12, 19, and 26
Drug effects questionnaires (visual analog scales with range from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximum effect)) were administered following weekly doses of methamphetamine starting on Day 5, one day after IXT-m200 or placebo administration. Participants were asked questions assessing subjective effects for STIMULATED over 180 minutes. Values were calculated as an area under the curve by using the trapezoidal rule; time 0 was set to 0 on the effect scale (at time of methamphetamine administration) and the area was calculated through 180 min post-dose. Lower values would indicate less drug effect (better) than higher values indicating larger drug effect (worse).
Time frame: 126 days
Number of serious adverse events (SAEs) as identified by physical examinations and vital sign, adverse event, ECG, and clinical laboratory testing, and immune response by measurement of anti-IXT-m200 antibody levels.
Time frame: 122 days
Measured by serum concentrations of IXT-m200 over time
InterveXion Therapeutics, LLC
Industry
STAMPOUT: Study of Antibody for Methamphetamine Outpatient Therapy
Acronym: STAMPOUT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04544124
Adults, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05916989
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06233799
Methamphetamine Abuse, Methamphetamine-dependence
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06788587
Addiction, Behavior
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details