Acalabrutinib
Drugacalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily orally
NCT Number: NCT04075292
This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Acalabrutinib versus Chlorambucil plus Rituximab in subjects with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–130 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Beijing, China
Patients be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into 2 arms to receive either acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm A) or rituximab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm B). The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of acalabrutinib relative to chlorambucil plus rituximab in subjects with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia without del(17p) or TP53 mutation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily orally
Rituximab: 375 mg/m2 IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1. 500 mg/m2 IV infusion on Day 1 for each of subsequent cycles (Cycles 2-6)
Chlorambucil: 0.5 mg/kg body weight orally on Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycles 1-6
Time frame: Response evaluations performed every 12 weeks from Cycle 4 Day 1 to Cycle 25, then every 24 weeks until PD or death, up to DCO date of 03 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 47.5 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD (assessed by BICR according to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia [iwCLL] 2018 guideline criteria) or death due to any cause. PD was defined as meeting at least 1 of the below criteria of groups(g) A or B. gA: increase of ≥50% from baseline (BL) or from response in lymph nodes or liver and/or spleen size; any constitutional symptoms; increase of ≥50% over nadir with absolute count ≥ 5×10^9/liter (L) in circulating lymphocyte count (CLC); gB: decrease of ≥50% from BL secondary to CLL in platelet count; decrease of ≥2 gram per deciliter (g/dL) from BL secondary to CLL in hemoglobin (Hb); increase of CLL cells by ≥50% on successive biopsies in bone marrow (BM). Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its confidence interval (CI) using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Time frame: Response evaluations performed every 12 weeks from Cycle 4 Day 1 to Cycle 25, then every 24 weeks until PD or death, up to DCO date of 03 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 47.5 months)
ORR:percentage of participants with complete response(CR),CR with incomplete BM recovery(CRi), partial response(PR)/nodular PR(nPR) assessed by BICR;investigator per IWCLL 2018 criteria at/before initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy.CR:No lymph nodes(target lesions)≥1.5 centimeter(cm), spleen<13cm,normal liver;CLC,no constitutional symptoms,platelets≥100,000/microliter(μL),Hb≥11.0 g/dL,BM:normocellular,no CLL cells&B-lymphoid nodules.PR:atleast 2 gA parameters;1 gB parameter need to improve if previously abnormal.If only 1 parameter of both gA,B was abnormal prior to therapy,only 1 needs to improve.gA:Decrease≥50% from BL in lymph nodes,liver & or spleen size,CLC;any constitutional symptoms, gB:platelet≥100,000/μL or increase 50% over BL;Hb≥11g/dL or increase≥50% over BL;BM:presence of CLL cells/B-lymphoid nodules/not done.CRi:all CR criteria+persistent anemia,thrombocytopenia or neutropenia unrelated to CLL,related to drug toxicity.nPR:CR+presence of B-lymphoid nodules in BM.
Time frame: Response evaluations performed every 12 weeks from Cycle 4 Day 1 to Cycle 25, then every 24 weeks until PD or death, up to DCO date of 03 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 47.5 months)
DOR was defined as the time from response (date of first documented response) to PD or death (absence of PD) as judged by BICR and investigator. PD was defined as meeting at least 1 of the below criteria of group A or group B. Group A: Increase of ≥ 50% from BL or from response in lymph nodes or liver and/or spleen size; any constitutional symptoms; increase of ≥50% over nadir with absolute count ≥ 5×10^9/L in CLC; group B: decrease of ≥50% from BL secondary to CLL in platelet count; decrease of ≥2 g/dL from BL secondary to CLL in hemoglobin; increase of CLL cells by ≥50% on successive biopsies in marrow. Median DOR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Time frame: Response evaluations performed every 12 weeks from Cycle 4 Day 1 to Cycle 25, then every 24 weeks until PD, and survival follow-ups performed every 12 weeks thereafter, up to DCO date of 03 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 47.5 months)
TTNT was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of non-protocol-specified anti-CLL therapy (either medication or radiotherapy for CLL) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median TTNT was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI was calculated using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to DCO date of 03 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 47.5 months)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. The median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI was calculated using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Time frame: At Cycle 9 (cycle duration: 28 days)
The MRD negative rate was defined as the percentage of participants with MRD-negativity (defined as <1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes) measured in the peripheral blood by flow cytometry.
Time frame: Pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (cycle duration: 28 days)
Blood samples were collected to determine the concentration of acalabrutinib and its metabolite ACP-5862 in plasma.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to DCO date of 03 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 47.5 months)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (other than progression of the malignancy under evaluation) in participant or clinical study participant administered medicinal product and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE occurring during any study phase, that fulfilled 1 or more of following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-participant hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was congenital abnormality or birth defect, and was an important medical event that jeopardized participant or required medical treatment to prevent 1 of outcomes listed above. TEAE was any AE that occurred or worsened in severity on or after date of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or prior to initiation of a new anti-CLL therapy, whichever occurred first.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib Versus Chlorambucil Plus Rituximab in Subjects With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02553447
Avitaminosis, Chronic Disease
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03041636
Chronic Disease, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04963946
Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Angers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05458297
Chronic Disease, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial Details