Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01024608

Study in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an investigational nasal aerosol compared with placebo nasal aerosol in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Teva Clinical Trial Site, Austin, Texas, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed Consent
  • Male or female subjects 12 years of age or older
  • Documented history of season allergic rhinitis to mountain cedar pollen
  • General good health
  • Other criteria apply

Exclusion criteria

  • History of physical findings of nasal pathology (within 60 days prior to screening visit)
  • Participation in any investigational drug study 30 days preceding screening visit
  • History of respiratory infection/disorder with 14 days preceding screening visit
  • Use of any prohibited concomitant medications
  • Other criteria apply

Treatment and study plan

Beclomethasone dipropionate

Drug

Total daily dose of 320 micrograms per day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) applied as a nasal aerosol each morning for two weeks.

Other names: QNASL(TM)

Placebo Nasal Aerosol

Drug

Placebo nasal aerosol administered each morning for two weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Reported AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline (Days -3 to 0), and Days 1-15

    Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, nasal itching and nasal congestion) over the past 12 hours (prior to the assessment) twice daily (AM and PM) using the following scale:

    0=absent (no sign/symptom present); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping).

    The rTNSS (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Reported AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline (Days -3 to 0), and Days 1-15

    Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, nasal itching and nasal congestion) over the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) twice daily (AM and PM) using the following scale:

    0=absent (no sign/symptom present); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities).

    The iTNSS (sum of the 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

  2. Change From Baseline at Week 2 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline

    Time frame: Day 0 (Baseline), Day 15

    The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains. Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Not Troubled to 6 = Extremely Troubled) for the domains of activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, and eye symptoms. The domain of 'emotional' utilized a separate scale (0 = None of the time to 6 = All of the time). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses. Week 2 scores were compared to baseline scores. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

  3. Change From Baseline in AM and PM Subject-reported Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline (Days -3 to 0), and Days 1-15

    Participants recorded the severity of their ocular symptoms (Itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes) over the past 12 hours (prior to the assessment) twice daily (AM and PM) using the following scale:

    0=absent (no sign/symptom present); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities).

    The total ocular symptom score ranges from 0 to 9 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Hydrofluoroalkane (BDP HFA) Nasal Aerosol in Subjects 12 Years of Age and Older With SAR

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Dec 3, 2009
Registry last updated
Dec 3, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.