Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01863901

Study Evaluating Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity Using the Cryo-Touch III Device

A proof of concept study to evaluate the feasibility of safe and effective treatment of upper limb spasticity using the Cryo-Touch III Device.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kansas City Bone and Joint Clinic, Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Spasticity, common in neurological disorders, is part of the upper motor neuron syndrome displaying increased tone, clonus, spasms, spastic dystonia and co- contractions. The impact of spasticity on the patient varies from a subtle neurological sign to severe spasticity causing pain and contractures. Upper limb spasticity (ULS) is the rapid contraction or shortening of the muscles in the arm causing abnormal muscle movements in the elbow, wrist and fingers. It has been reported that over 1 million Americans with traumatic injury to the brain or spinal cord, stroke, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy experience ULS. Tightly clenched fists, twisted wrist and elbow joints, and fixed arms in flexed positions result in extreme discomfort, pain and spasm. A nonsurgical, minimally invasive, effective approach to pain associated with ULS is desirable.

Myoscience, Inc. (Redwood City, CA) has developed a pain management device - the Cryo-Touch III - for a novel, minimally invasive procedure using focused cold therapy to target sensory nerve tissue and offer long-lasting pain relief through cryoanalgesia. The device operates on the well-established cryobiology principle that localized exposure to controlled, moderately low temperature conditions can alter tissue function. The therapy treats nerves via a probe in the form of an assembly of small diameter needles, creating a highly localized, low temperature treatment zone around the probe. This focused cold therapy creates a conduction block that prevents nerve signaling. Prior studies of the Cryo-Touch, Cryo-Touch II, Cryo-Touch III (a.k.a. PCP 1.0) devices have provided preliminary evidence of effectiveness on motor nerves and have been shown to be safe with no serious device-related adverse events.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, 18 years of age and older.
  • Trial participants must have a confirmed diagnosis that results in spasticity involving muscle innervated by the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN).
  • Any medications must be maintained on a stable schedule for at least two weeks prior to treatment. No washout period is allowed.
  • Must have an average score on the Modified Ashworth Scale for Spasticity of ≥ 2 over the last 30 days in the elbow.
  • Subject, in the Investigator's opinion, will not be exposed to unacceptable risk by participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous surgical intervention that altered the target neural anatomy of the upper limb.
  • Any injection (neurolytic, sclerosing, anesthetic, etc.) to the upper limb within the last 4 months.
  • Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study that specifically targets spasticity management.
  • Allergy or intolerance to local anesthesia.
  • Any local skin condition at the treatment site that in the investigator's opinion would adversely affect treatment or outcomes.
  • Any chronic medication use (prescription, over-the-counter, etc.) that in the investigator's opinion would affect study participation or subject safety.
  • Diagnosis of cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, cold urticaria, Raynaud's disease, open and/or infected wounds.
  • Diagnosis of progressive neurologic diseases such as ALS.
  • For any reason, in the opinion of the investigator, the subject may not be a suitable candidate for study participation (i.e., history of noncompliance, drug dependency, any related upper limb injury, etc.).

Treatment and study plan

Treatment with Cryo-Touch III device

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. Decrease in Pain and Symptoms Caused by Hypertonia in the Upper Arm as Measured by an Improvement of 1 Point or Greater on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at Day 7

    Time frame: Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is 6-point scale designed to assess muscle tone and spasticity through the flexion or extension of a joint. Muscle response is graded on a scale from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension). This includes a 1+ rating, which further distinguishes the types of increase in muscle tone from those described by a 1 or 2 rating.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Spasticity as Measured by the Tardieu Scale

    Time frame: Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30

    The Tardieu Scale uses the application of stretch at several velocities to quantify muscle response and assess muscle spasticity. Two specified velocities were assessed (V1 and V2). For each stretch, quality of muscle reaction (X) is recorded on a 6-point scale from 0 (no resistance throughout passive movement) to 5 (immovable joint).

  2. Improvement in Spasm Frequency and Severity as Measured by the Penn Spasm Score

    Time frame: Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30

    The Penn Spasm Score, which is a patient reported score, consists of two sub-scales: the spasm frequency score and the spasm severity scale3. The Penn spasm frequency is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 (no spasms) to 4 (spasms occurring more than ten times per hour). The spasm severity scale consists of three ratings, which are 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe).

  3. Improvement in Upper Extremity Motor Recovery as Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Scale (Post Stroke Subjects Only)

    Time frame: Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30

    The Fugl-Meyer Scale is an assessment consisting of 33 movements, each rated as "0" (cannot perform), "1" (can partially perform) or "2" (can perform fully). A Subject's score is the sum of their ratings on each of these items, where the maximum (best) score is a 66.

  4. Subject Assessed Change in Mean Spasticity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score

    Time frame: baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30

    The NRS is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, where lower scores represent less spasticity.

  5. Improvement in Pain as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Baseline to: Post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30

    Visual Analog Scale assesses pain on a 0-10 point range. 0= no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Higher score is associated with a worse outcome.

  6. Duration of Treatment Effect

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 56, Day 84, Day 112

    Subjects were asked to report the duration of treatment effect at Day 7,Day 30, and Day 56. Subjects could designate their results as "effect" "no effect" or "no longer effective". Subjects reporting "effect" at Day 56 were followed to Day 84; those with effect at Day 84 continued to be followed to Day 112.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Non-Randomized, Unblinded Study Evaluating the Treatment With the Cryo-Touch III Device for Upper Limb Spasticity

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
May 29, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.