Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00366249

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Once-daily Dose of Tigecycline vs Ertapenem in Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI) With a Substudy in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infections Complicated by Osteomyelitis.

The purpose of this study was to look at the safety and effectiveness of a once-daily dose of tigecycline compared to ertapenem for the treatment of diabetic foot infections. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were not met.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Main inclusion criteria:

  • Men and women aged 18 or older with diabetes and a qualifying foot infection. People with evidence of a diabetic foot infection with osteomyelitis may qualify for the osteomyelitis substudy arm.

Main exclusion criteria:

  • People with additional significant disease, infection with resistant pathogens, contraindication, or hypersensitivity to any test article or related antibiotic.

Treatment and study plan

tigecycline

Drug

150 mg Tigecycline once-daily IV infusion for up to 28 days, or 42 days for the substudy wth osteomyelitis

Ertapenem

Drug

Ertapenem 1g IV infusion every 24 hours +/- vancomycin depending on culture results and at the discretion of investigator (for coverage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) or enterococci coverage).

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.

    Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last dose

    Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, >120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI) > 48 hrs.

  2. Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.

    Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last dose

    Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, >120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI > 48 hrs. Indeterminate: Lost to follow-up, death<48 hours or noninfection related.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.

    Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 25 - 27 weeks post last dose

    Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, >120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI > 48 hrs.

  2. Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.

    Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 25 - 27 weeks post last dose

    Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, >120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI > 48 hrs. Indeterminate: Lost to follow-up, death<48 hours or noninfection related.

  3. Number of Patients With Microbiologic Response of Eradication.

    Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last dose

    Eradication defined as: no pathogen is present in the repeat culture from the original site of infection, or a clinical response of the cure precludes the availability of a specimen for culture.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Once-Daily Dose of Tigecycline Versus Ertapenem for the Treatment of Foot Infections in Subjects With Diabetes

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Aug 21, 2006
Registry last updated
Apr 28, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.