Tyler Retina Research Institute
Tyler, Texas, 75703, United States
NCT Number: NCT07456826
This Phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical study evaluates the efficacy and safety of chloroprocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel 3% (IHEEZO) compared with routine anesthesia (topical proparacaine 0.5% combined with subconjunctival lidocaine 2%) for ocular surface anesthesia during intravitreal injection procedures. Adult participants scheduled to undergo unilateral intravitreal injection of an FDA-approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent for retinal conditions will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IHEEZO with a sham subconjunctival procedure or routine anesthesia.
The primary objective is to determine whether IHEEZO is non-inferior to routine anesthesia in achieving successful ocular surface anesthesia, defined as a participant-reported pain score of 0 or 1 (on a 0-5 ordinal pain scale) immediately before and immediately after intravitreal injection. Secondary outcomes include individual and cumulative pain scores, change from baseline in dry eye symptoms measured by the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, and ocular safety assessments through Day 7 follow-up.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Tyler, Texas, 75703, United States
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, controlled Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating the non-inferiority of chloroprocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel 3% (IHEEZO) compared with routine anesthesia (topical proparacaine 0.5% plus subconjunctival lidocaine 2%) for ocular surface anesthesia during intravitreal injection (IVT).
Adults scheduled to undergo unilateral intravitreal injection of an FDA-approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, or diabetic retinopathy will be randomized 1:1 to receive either IHEEZO with a sham subconjunctival procedure or routine anesthesia. Randomization will be stratified by clinical site and baseline ocular dryness severity (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness [SPEED] score).
Participants in the experimental arm will receive three topical drops of chloroprocaine ophthalmic gel 3% followed by a sham subconjunctival procedure. Participants in the comparator arm will receive three topical drops of proparacaine 0.5% followed by subconjunctival lidocaine 2%. Standard antiseptic preparation with 5% povidone-iodine will be performed prior to IVT in both arms.
The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants achieving successful ocular surface anesthesia, defined as a pain score of 0 or 1 on a 0-5 ordinal pain scale both immediately before and immediately after IVT. Participants requiring rescue anesthesia prior to or during IVT will be considered treatment failures.
Secondary endpoints include individual and cumulative pain scores, change from baseline in SPEED questionnaire score, and ocular safety assessments including best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal fluorescein staining (Oxford scale), and treatment-emergent adverse events through Day 7 (±2 days). Participants will be followed for approximately 7 days after injection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Preservative-free chloroprocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel 3% administered as 3 topical drops to the study eye prior to intravitreal injection.
Sham procedure performed using a syringe with a blunt-tipped cannula that does not contact the conjunctiva, performed to maintain masking prior to intravitreal injection.
Topical proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.5% administered as 3 drops to the study eye prior to intravitreal injection.
Subconjunctival injection of lidocaine hydrochloride 2% administered after topical proparacaine and prior to intravitreal injection.
Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after intravitreal injection (Day 1)
Successful ocular surface anesthesia is defined as a participant-reported pain score of 0 (no pain/discomfort) or 1 (pressure only, no pain) at BOTH of the following timepoints:
Pain is assessed using a 0-5 descriptor-based ordinal scale:
0 = No pain/discomfort
Participants requiring rescue anesthesia at any time before or during intravitreal injection are considered treatment failures.
Time frame: Immediately before intravitreal injection (Day 1)
Pain is assessed using a 0-5 descriptor-based ordinal pain scale (minimum = 0, maximum = 5), where 0 indicates no pain and 5 indicates severe/intolerable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Immediately after intravitreal injection (Day 1)
Pain is assessed using a 0-5 descriptor-based ordinal pain scale (minimum = 0, maximum = 5), where 0 indicates no pain and 5 indicates severe/intolerable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Evening of Day 1 (3-12 hours post-injection)
Participant-reported pain score assessed 3-12 hours after intravitreal injection. Pain is assessed using a 0-5 descriptor-based ordinal pain scale (minimum = 0, maximum = 5), where 0 indicates no pain and 5 indicates severe/intolerable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Day 2 (20-28 hours post-injection)
Participant-reported pain score assessed 20-28 hours after intravitreal injection. Pain is assessed using a 0-5 descriptor-based ordinal pain scale (minimum = 0, maximum = 5), where 0 indicates no pain and 5 indicates severe/intolerable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Day 1 through 24 hours post-injection
Sum of four pain assessments: pre-injection, post-injection, evening follow-up, and 24-hour follow-up. Each individual pain score ranges from 0 to 5; therefore, the cumulative 24-hour pain score ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater cumulative pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Evening Day 1, and Day 2 (20-28 hours)
Change from baseline in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) total score. The SPEED questionnaire total score ranges from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater dry eye symptom severity.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 ± 2 days
Best-corrected visual acuity measured using LogMAR visual acuity scale (minimum and maximum values dependent on chart range). Lower LogMAR values indicate better visual acuity.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 ± 2 days
Intraocular pressure measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Higher values indicate higher intraocular pressure.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline, post-injection Day 1, and Day 7 ± 2 days
Corneal staining graded using the Oxford Grading Scale (ordinal scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 5). Higher grades indicate greater corneal staining severity.
Time frame: Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 7 ± 2 days Unit: Number of participants with ≥1 TEA
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Harrow Inc
Industry
A Phase 4, Multisite, Randomized, Double-Masked, Well-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Chloroprocaine HCl Ophthalmic Gel 3% vs Proparacaine Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% Plus Subconjunctival Lidocaine in Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections: The QUELL Study
Acronym: Quell
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02585401
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Cardiovascular Diseases
Many Locations, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07520045
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Osijek, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT07514559
Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD), Cardiovascular Diseases
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT07301775
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cataract
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details