UCLA Health System
Los Angeles, California, 90049, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Catherine Sarkisian, MD
CONTACT
Catherine Sarkisian, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Katelyn Assistant Clinical Research Coordinator
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06995378
This study evaluates whether adding machine learning-based risk information to electronic health record (EHR) lab result messages helps older adults better understand their risk of developing diabetes and influences their emotional responses, quality of life, and healthcare use.
Eligible participants are adults aged 65 years and older with a UCLA primary care provider and a hemoglobin A1c level in the range (5.7-6.0%). Participants are identified automatically at the time their lab results are processed and are randomly assigned to receive either standard lab result messages or modified messages that include a "very low risk" label generated by a machine learning model.
All participants who are randomized are invited to complete two surveys: one shortly after their lab result is posted in MyChart and a follow-up survey approximately 30 days later. The study also uses de-identified EHR data to examine patterns of healthcare utilization and progression to diabetes. Provider comments related to lab result messaging will be analyzed to explore differences in response patterns between the two groups.
Interested in participating?
Request Info65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Los Angeles, California, 90049, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Catherine Sarkisian, MD
CONTACT
Catherine Sarkisian, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Katelyn Assistant Clinical Research Coordinator
CONTACT
Prediabetes thresholds based on hemoglobin A1c were originally developed using younger, healthier populations and may not reflect the slower and more variable glycemic changes observed in older adults. Evidence from large community-based cohorts suggests that adults aged 65 years and older with A1c values in the prediabetes range are often more likely to return to normal glycemia than to progress to diabetes, creating uncertainty for patients and providers when interpreting lab results.
Machine learning models developed using de-identified UCLA Health EHR data from multiple annual cohorts between 2020 and 2024 demonstrated strong performance in predicting progression to diabetes. The final model uses a CatBoost architecture and incorporates approximately 94 routinely collected clinical variables to generate patient-specific risk scores. Model performance was evaluated across yearly cohorts, and the selected model is locked for the duration of the study without updating or adapting to new data.
The study follows a real-world, randomized deployment design in which eligible individuals in the lowest 15% of model-predicted risk within the eligible study population are identified automatically at the time lab results are processed and assigned to either modified or standard lab result messaging. De-identified EHR data and free-text provider comments are used to examine healthcare utilization, disease progression, and provider response patterns over time.
All participants who are randomized are invited to complete two surveys. The first survey is administered shortly after receipt of the laboratory result and is designed to assess immediate patient understanding of the result and emotional responses such as anxiety or reassurance. A second survey is administered approximately one month later and uses validated instruments to measure health-related quality of life, food-related quality of life and eating behavior, and perceived burden of healthcare. Both study arms receive the same surveys, allowing comparison of patient-reported outcomes between standard and modified laboratory result messaging. Surveys are distributed only to participants who have been randomized to either modified or standard laboratory result messaging. Therefore, no additional eligibility criteria apply for survey participation beyond randomization.
By embedding model-generated risk information directly into routine EHR workflows, this study aims to generate evidence on whether precision-based communication can support more individualized, patient-centered care and inform future implementation across broader patient populations and clinical use cases.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All randomized participants are eligible to receive study surveys. No additional eligibility criteria apply for survey participation.
HgbA1c of 6.0 or above is not eligible.
A behavioral intervention delivered through a personalized Electronic Health Record (EHR)-integrated lab result communication tool designed to improve emotional and cognitive responses to lab results among adults aged 65+. The tool applies behavioral science principles such as risk personalization, simplified messaging, and visual framing to reduce patient anxiety, enhance understanding, and support informed decision-making.
Time frame: 365 days after result
Total count of prediabetes-related healthcare utilization defined as the sum of outpatient visits to endocrinology, repeat hemoglobin A1c tests, and new prescriptions for diabetes-related medications following the index A1c result.
Time frame: 365 days after result
Total number of repeat hemoglobin A1c laboratory tests performed after the index test. This measure reflects follow-up glycemic testing and serves as an indicator of diabetes-related monitoring and healthcare utilization.
Time frame: 180 days after result
Total number of prescriptions issued for medications commonly used for glycemic management (e.g., metformin) following the index hemoglobin A1c result. This outcome captures initiation of pharmacologic treatment related to diabetes risk.
Time frame: 180 days after result
Total count of outpatient visits across all specialties following the index A1c result
Time frame: 14 days after initial result
Total number of outpatient referrals to an endocrinologist occurring after the index hemoglobin A1c laboratory result. This measure is used to quantify diabetes-related specialty care utilization potentially associated with interpretation of the laboratory result communication.
Time frame: 14 days after initial result
Number of participants with an electronic referral order placed to clinical nutrition services documented in the electronic health record after release of the hemoglobin A1c result.
Time frame: 14 days after initial result
Number of participants with an electronic referral order placed to diabetes education services documented in the electronic health record after release of the hemoglobin A1c result.
Time frame: 180 days after result
Number of participants who complete an outpatient endocrinology encounter documented in the electronic health record after laboratory result notification. Visit completion will be identified using encounter records associated with endocrinology clinic services.
Time frame: 180 days after result
Number of participants who complete an outpatient visit with clinical nutrition services documented in the electronic health record following laboratory result notification. Completion will be determined using encounter data associated with nutrition services.
Time frame: 180 days after result
Number of participants who complete an outpatient visit with diabetes education services documented in the electronic health record following laboratory result notification. Completion will be determined using encounter data associated with diabetes education.
Time frame: 7 days after viewing lab result
Count of MyChart Test Result Messages
Time frame: 7 days after viewing lab result
Count of telephone encounters to ordering provider
Time frame: 30 days after initial survey invitation
Patient-reported quality of life assessed using survey responses evaluating overall physical, mental, and health-related well-being following receipt of lab result communication.
Time frame: 30 days after initial survey invitation
Self-reported physical function asking about ability to perform activities such as household chores, stair climbing, walking, and running errands following receipt of lab result communication. This measure uses structured survey items to evaluate whether receipt of A1c lab result communication is associated with changes in exercise.
Time frame: 30 days after initial survey invitation
Patient-reported dietary behaviors following receipt of lab result, including eating patterns, appetite, satiety, and food-related changes or restrictions due to concerns about lab results. These behaviors are assessed to understand potential impacts on health and weight-related decision-making. This measure uses structured survey items to evaluates whether receipt of A1c lab result communication is associated with changes dietary behaviors.
Time frame: 7 days after results
Patient-reported understanding of lab report and emotional response to result communication, including perceived clarity, reassurance, and level of concern, assessed using structured survey items designed to measure comprehension and anxiety following receipt of laboratory result messaging.
Time frame: 3 years
Proportion of participants who progress from prediabetes to diabetes based on electronic health record data, defined by meeting diagnostic criteria for diabetes during follow-up. This outcome is included to monitor long-term clinical safety and progression.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of California, Los Angeles
Other
Evaluation of Patient and Provider Facing EHR-embedded Risk Stratification Tools
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07713030
Behavior, Diabetes Mellitus
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07695675
Behavior, Diabetes Mellitus
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05681468
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06988462
Body Weight, Diabetes
Sommerville, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details