Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01445678

Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy study of CXA-201 Intravenous (IV) infusions (1500mg q8h) and metronidazole (500mg q8h) versus meropenem (1000mg q8h)for the treatment of adults with Complicated Intraabdominal Infections (cIAI).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Ciudadelo-Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Approximately, 500 subjects will be enrolled into this study, randomized 1:1 to receive CXA-201 and metronidazole or comparator (meropenem). Subject participation will require a minimum commitment of 38 days and a maximum of 45 days. An End of Treatment (EOT) visit will occur within 24 hours following the last dose of study drug administration/drug discontinuation. A Test of Cure (TOC)/Safety visit will be conducted 26 to 30 days following the first dose of study drug administration. A Last Follow-up (LFU) visit will be conducted 38 to 45 days after the first dose of study drug.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnoses of cIAI.
  • Subject requires surgical intervention (e.g., laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, or percutaneous draining of an abscess) within 24 hours of (before or after) the first dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

  • Simple appendicitis; acute suppurative cholangitis; infected necrotizing pancreatitis; pancreatic abscess; or pelvic infections.
  • Complicated intraabdominal infection managed by staged abdominal repair (STAR), open abdomen technique including temporary closure of the abdomen, or any situation where infection source control is not likely to be achieved.
  • Use of systemic antibiotic therapy for IAI for more than 24 hours prior to the first dose of study drug, unless there is a documented treatment failure with such therapy.
  • Have a concomitant infection at the time of randomization, which requires non-study systemic antibacterial therapy in addition to IV study drug therapy. (Drugs with only gram-positive activity [e.g., daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid] are allowed).
  • Severe impairment of renal function (estimated CrCl < 30 mL/min), or requirement for peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis or hemofiltration, or oliguria (< 20 mL/h urine output over 24 hours).
  • The presence of hepatic disease at baseline.
  • Considered unlikely to survive the 4 to 5 week study period.
  • Any rapidly-progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness (including respiratory failure and septic shock).
  • Have a documented history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam antibacterial (a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment), including cephalosporins, carbapenems, penicillins, or ß-lactamase inhibitors, or metronidazole, or nitroimidazole derivatives.
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing.

Treatment and study plan

CXA-201 and metronidazole

Drug

CXA-201 IV infusion (1500mg q8h) and metronidazole IV infusion (500mg q 8h) for 4-14 days

Meropenem

Drug

Meropenem IV infusion (1000mg q8h) for 4-14 days

Primary outcomes

  1. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) Population

    Time frame: TOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration

    Clinical cure is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Percentage of Subjects With Microbiological Outcome of Success at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population

    Time frame: TOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration

    Success is eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a subject who was assessed as a clinical cure) for each baseline pathogen

  2. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT Population

    Time frame: EOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administration

    Clinical response is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.

  3. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy in the ME Population

    Time frame: EOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administration

    Clinical response is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.

  4. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at Long Term Follow-Up (LFU) in the MITT Population

    Time frame: LFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administration

    Clinical response is clinical cure at TOC and no signs and symptoms recur or worsen since the TOC visit.

  5. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at LFU Visit in the ME Population

    Time frame: LFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administration

    Clinical response is clinical cure at TOC and no signs and symptoms recur or worsen since the TOC visit

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous CXA-201 With That of Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Oct 4, 2011
Registry last updated
Nov 16, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.