Fludarabine
Drug30 mg/m2/day IV fludarabine for 5 days (day-6 to day-2)
NCT Number: NCT05917405
Relapse remains the main cause of death in patients with myeloid malignancies, especially after an allotransplant. Using drugs with higher anti-leukemic activity as part of the conditioning regimen is one of the strategies to decrease relapse incidence in this population. Retrospective studies have shown that clofarabine can achieve impressive results compared to the use of fludarabine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as part of the conditioning regimen. Confirming such results in a prospective manner would definitely establish the CloB2A2 as a superior reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen compared to the FB2A2 for AML patients.302 AML patients (151 in each arm) in complete remission at transplant will be included with the main objective to demonstrate a significant better 2-year overall survival for CloB2A2 cases (70% vs 55%). A cost-utility analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be also performed as well as an assessment of the quality of life after transplant. Clofarabine will be furnished to all centers. The duration of the study will be 5 years with 3 years of inclusion and 2 years of follow-up for each patient.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
CHU de Nantes, Nantes, Loire Atlantique, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Age ≥ 18 years' old
Exclusion criteria
30 mg/m2/day IV fludarabine for 5 days (day-6 to day-2)
130 mg/m2/day IV busulfan once daily for 2 days (day -4 and -3)
Thymoglobuline®: 2.5 mg/Kg/day IV for 2 consecutive days (day -2 and -1)
30 mg/m2/day IV clofarabine for 5 days (day-6 to day-2)
Time frame: 2 years
OS is defined as the time from day 1 of conditioning to death or last follow-up for survivors.
Time frame: day +30/42 and 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
DFS: time from day1 of the conditioning to time without death or evidence of relapse or disease progression censored at the date of last follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
Relapse: any event related to progression or re-occurrence of the disease from day 1 of the conditioning.
Time frame: 2 years
NRM: death from any cause without previous relapse or progression from day 1 of the conditioning
Time frame: Day 90 and 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
GRFS: alive with no previous grade III-IV acute GvHD, no moderate or severe chronic GvHD and no relapse from day 1 of the conditioning
Time frame: days +30, +60, +90
Chimerism: peripheral blood and CD3 T cells by molecular markers at days +30, +60, +90/100
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Immune reconstitution: Immunophenotype of PB lymphocytes and EPP: CD4, CD8, B, NK, EPP at 3, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: days +30 and +90
Minimal residual disease (MRD): before transplant, at day +30 and day +90/100 by flow cytometry, molecular biology and NGS (if available) (ELN 2022 recommendation, Dohner et al Blood 2022)
Time frame: day+90
Comparison of infections after FB2A2 vs CloB2A2: bacterial, viral, parasitic and fungal between day 0 and day+90/100
Time frame: Days -7, +30, +90, +180, +360 and +720
Score of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, including 30 questions assessing some aspects of the quality of life of cancer patients. The total score ranges from 0 to 100.
Time frame: Days -7, +30, +90, +180 and +360
Score of the FACT-BMT questionnaire, including 50 questions assessing some aspects of the quality of life of cancer patients. The total score ranges from 0 to 200.
Time frame: 2 years
Graft hospitalization cost: Comparison between both groups in terms of length of stay (in days), use of antibiotics (type and length in days)
Time frame: 2 years
Graft hospitalization cost: Comparison between both groups in terms of blood products administered (numbers)
Time frame: Days -7, +30, +90, +180, +360 and +720.
General Health State with Euroqol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at Days -7, 30, 90, 180, 360 and 720; 5 answers are possible.
Time frame: 2 years
Health Economic study: Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR, cost per quality-adjusted life year [QALY] gained) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, cost per life year gained), from a collective perspective and with a 24-month time horizon
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of time from D1 of conditioning to death or last follow-up for survivors
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of time from day1 of the conditioning to time without death or evidence of relapse or disease progression censored at the date of last follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of time from D1 of conditioning to death or last follow-up for survivors
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of time from day1 of the conditioning to time without death or evidence of relapse or disease progression censored at the date of last follow-up.
Time frame: day+90
Comparison of occurrence of veno-occlusive disease : (Mohty et al, BMT 2016) betwee
Time frame: 2 years
Safety assessment: the safety assessment shall be done by collecting all adverse events that occur during the research. All adverse event (except GvHD) shall be graded according to CTC-AE Toxicity Grading Scale (version 5).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
MARION GAUTIER
CONTACT
Patrice CHEVALLIER, Pr
CONTACT
Nantes University Hospital
Other
FLUCLORIC: Randomized Multicentric Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy of 2 Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens (Clofarabine/Busulfan vs Fludarabine/Busulfan) in Adults With AML and Eligible to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Acronym: FLUCLORIC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03670966
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06440135
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04062266
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02220985
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive, Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details