Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF)
Drug300-mg tablet QD
Other names: Viread
NCT Number: NCT00298363
This study was designed to evaluate and compare the safety and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF, and entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of hepatitis B patients with decompensated liver disease. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities. Efficacy was assessed by evaluating reductions in Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, reductions in hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), changes in liver enzymes, development of drug-resistant mutations, and generation of antibody to virus.
A maximum randomized treatment duration of 168 weeks was planned. Since subjects with decompensated liver disease were enrolled into this study, it was necessary to provide early intervention strategies if profound viral suppression was not expeditiously achieved. For this reason, subjects with a decrease in plasma HBV DNA from baseline of < 2 log_10 copies/mL and plasma HBV DNA > 10,000 copies/mL (or plasma HBV DNA > 1,000 copies/mL for subjects who entered the study with HBV DNA < 10,000 copies/mL) at Week 8 had the option to start open-label FTC/TDF and continue in the study. Subjects with a virologic breakthrough or who had plasma HBV DNA levels remaining > 400 copies/mL (confirmed) at or after 24 weeks of treatment could have been unblinded at the investigator's discretion for selection of alternative anti-HBV therapy that may have included open-label FTC/TDF. If study drug was permanently discontinued, immediate initiation of another anti-HBV regimen was strongly recommended.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–69 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Heritage Medical Research Clinic, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A participant was required to meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in the study:
Exclusion criteria
A participant who met any of the following exclusion criteria could not be enrolled in the study:
300-mg tablet QD
Other names: Viread
FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet QD
Other names: Truvada
0.5-mg or 1-mg tablet QD
Other names: Baraclude
Placebo to match TDF QD
Placebo to match FTC/TDF QD
Placebo to match ETV QD
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
Tolerability failure was defined as permanent discontinuation of study drug due to a treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), including any subject who temporarily discontinued study drug due to an AE and did not restart. Results are expressed as proportions of participants who experience tolerability failure using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method of estimation.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
Results are expressed as proportions of participants who experience a confirmed increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL from baseline or a confirmed serum phosphorus level < 2.0 mg/dL using the KM method of estimation.
Time frame: Baseline to 48 weeks
Change from baseline was evaluated by subtracting baseline HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL from Week 48 HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL. DAVG is defined as the area of the trapezoid under the response-time curve divided by time to the last available evaluation of the patient minus the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline to 96 weeks
Change from baseline was evaluated by subtracting baseline HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL from Week 96 HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL. DAVG is defined as the area of the trapezoid under the response-time curve divided by time to the last available evaluation of the patient minus the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline to 144 weeks
Change from baseline was evaluated by subtracting baseline HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL from Week 144 HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL. DAVG is defined as the area of the trapezoid under the response-time curve divided by time to the last available evaluation of the patient minus the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline to 168 weeks
Change from baseline was evaluated by subtracting baseline HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL from Week 168 HBV DNA log_10 copies/mL. DAVG is defined as the area of the trapezoid under the response-time curve divided by time to the last available evaluation of the patient minus the baseline value.
Time frame: Week 48
The percentage of participants with plasma HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL at Week 48 was summarized.
Time frame: Week 96
The percentage of participants with plasma HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL at Week 96 was summarized.
Time frame: Week 144
The percentage of participants with plasma HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL at Week 144 was summarized.
Time frame: Week 168
The percentage of participants with plasma HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL at Week 168 was summarized.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Normalized ALT is defined as having a baseline ALT value > the upper limit of the normal range (ULN), and a decrease in ALT value to ≤ ULN at the given time point.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
Normalized ALT is defined as having a baseline ALT value > ULN, and a decrease in ALT value to ≤ ULN at the given time point.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 144
Normalized ALT is defined as having a baseline ALT value > ULN, and a decrease in ALT value to ≤ ULN at the given time point.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
Normalized ALT is defined as having a baseline ALT value > ULN, and a decrease in ALT value to ≤ ULN at the given time point.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 144
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 144
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
CPT scores, widely used to grade the severity of cirrhosis and to determine the need for liver transplantation, are calculated based on a combination of laboratory values and clinical features. CPT scores can range from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
MELD scores, used to assess prognosis and suitability for transplant, are calculated based on laboratory values only and can range from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
MELD scores, used to assess prognosis and suitability for transplant, are calculated based on laboratory values only and can range from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 144
MELD scores, used to assess prognosis and suitability for transplant, are calculated based on laboratory values only and can range from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
MELD scores, used to assess prognosis and suitability for transplant, are calculated based on laboratory values only and can range from 6 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 144
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 144
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
ADV resistance mutations are defined as the presence of the rtA181T/V HBV gene mutation and/or the rtN236T HBV gene mutation.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
LAM resistance mutations are defined as the presence of the rtM204V/I HBV gene mutation with or without the rtL180M HBV gene mutation.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 168
ADV resistance mutation + LAM resistance mutations are defined as the presence of the rtA181T/V HBV gene mutation and/or the rtN236T HBV gene mutation, and the rtM204V/I HBV gene mutation with or without the rtL180M HBV gene mutation.
Gilead Sciences
Industry
A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Multi-center, Randomized Study Comparing Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, Emtricitabine Plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Entecavir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Subjects With Decompensated Liver Disease and in the Prevention of Hepatitis B Recurrence Post-Transplantation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05630820
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Centreville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05630807
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04980482
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04412863
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
View Trial Details