SUBA-itraconazole
Drug100 mg approximately 30 minutes prior to breakfast for 12 weeks of SUBA™-Itraconazole 50 mg capsules (HalcyGen Ltd)
Other names: itraconazole 50 mg capsules
NCT Number: NCT00791219
The objective of this study is to compare the relative efficacy and safety of SUBA™-Itraconazole Capsules (HalcyGen Ltd) to an already marketed oral formulation of itraconazole SPORANOX® (itraconazole) capsules (Janssen Pharma) in the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail. Both the test and the reference formulations will also be compared to a placebo formulation to test for superiority.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Synergyst Research, Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States
Randomized, Double-Blind, Multiple-Site, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel designed study comparing a dosing regimen of 100 mg approximately 30 minutes prior to breakfast for 12 weeks of SUBA™-Itraconazole 50 mg capsules (HalcyGen Ltd) to the approved dosing regimen of 200 mg taken with breakfast of SPORANOX® (itraconazole) 100 mg capsules (Janssen Pharma). Patients will be randomly assigned in a 3:3:1 ratio to the test product 100 mg once-a-day: reference product 200 mg once-a-day: placebo once-a-day. respectively. The patients will complete 5 visits: baseline/screening (within 28 days of randomization), Day 1 (randomization), Week 6, Week 12 and Week 24.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
100 mg approximately 30 minutes prior to breakfast for 12 weeks of SUBA™-Itraconazole 50 mg capsules (HalcyGen Ltd)
Other names: itraconazole 50 mg capsules
200 mg taken with breakfast of SPORANOX® (itraconazole) 100 mg capsules (Janssen Pharma).
Other names: Sporanox
Two placebo capsules taken approximately 30 minutes prior to breakfast
Other names: placebo capsules
Time frame: Week 24
If the lower bound 95% confidence interval of the difference between the proportion of patients in the Test group compared to the Reference group considered a Therapeutic Cure at Visit 7 was greater than 20 then non-inferiority was considered to have been demonstrated
Time frame: Week 24
If the lower bound 95% confidence interval of the difference between the proportion of patients in the Test group compared to the Reference group considered a Clinical Cure at Visit 7 was greater than 20 then non-inferiority was considered to have been demonstrated
Time frame: Week 24
If the lower bound 95% confidence interval of the difference between the proportion of patients in the Test group compared to the Reference group considered a Mycological Cure at Visit 7 was greater than 20 then non-inferiority was considered to have been demonstrated
Time frame: Week 12
If the lower bound 95% confidence interval of the difference between the proportion of patients in the test group compared to the reference group considered a cure at the visit being analyzed was greater than -20 then non-inferiority was considered to have been demonstrated
Time frame: week 12
If the lower bound 95% confidence interval of the difference between the proportion of patients in the test group compared to the reference group considered a cure at the visit being analyzed was greater than -20 then non-inferiority was considered to have been demonstrated
Time frame: week 12
If the lower bound 95% confidence interval of the difference between the proportion of patients in the test group compared to the reference group considered a cure at the visit being analyzed was greater than -20 then non-inferiority was considered to have been demonstrated
Time frame: week 6
All primary and secondary endpoints were tested for superiority against Placebo. The intent to treat (ITT) was used for all superiority testing. For the three primary endpoints and all four dichotomous secondary endpoints, if the difference between the proportion of patients considered a cure in the Test or Reference group was statistically greater (p < 0.05) than the proportion of patients considered a cure in the Placebo group, then superiority of that treatment over placebo was considered to have been demonstrated. A one-sided continuity corrected Z-test was used for superiority testing.
Halcygen Pharmaceuticals Limited
Industry
A Randomized, Double Blind, Multiple-site, Placebo-Controlled Study, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of SUBA™-Itraconazole Capsules Compared to SPORANOX® (Itraconazole) Capsules in the Treatment of Onychomycosis of the Toenail
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06175013
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Dermatomycoses
Quatres Bornes, Mauritius
View Trial DetailsNCT05202366
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Dermatomycoses
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00233493
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Dermatomycoses
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05626270
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Dermatomycoses
Melbourne, Florida, United States
View Trial Details