Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03061812

Study Comparing Rovalpituzumab Tesirine Versus Topotecan in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer With High Levels of Delta-like Protein 3 (DLL3) and Who Have First Disease Progression During or Following Front-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy (TAHOE)

The purpose of this randomized, open-label, 2-arm, phase 3 study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rovalpituzumab tesirine versus topotecan in participants with advanced or metastatic SCLC with high levels of DLL3, who have first disease progression during or following front-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Blacktown Hospital /ID# 158907, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must have histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) with documented first disease progression during or following front-line platinum-based systemic regimen
  • Tumor must have high Delta-like protein 3 (DLL3) expression defined as having ≥ 75% tumor cells staining positive according to the VENTANA DLL3 (SP347) IHC Assay.
  • Participant must have measurable disease, as defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
  • Participant must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Participant must have recovery to Grade 0 or 1 of any clinically significant toxicity (excluding alopecia) prior to initiation of study drug administration.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant has a documented history of a cerebral vascular event (stroke or transient ischemic attack), unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or cardiac symptoms consistent with New York Heart Association Class (NYHA) III - IV within 6 months prior to their first dose of study drug.
  • Participant has known leptomeningeal metastases.
  • Participant has received more than one prior systemic therapy regimen for SCLC.
  • Participant had a serious infection within 2 weeks prior to randomization, including any Grade 3 or higher viral, bacterial, or fungal infection.
  • Participant has a history of active malignancies other than SCLC within the past 2 years prior to study entry, with the exception of in situ cancer which was curatively treated.
  • Participant had prior exposure to topotecan, irinotecan or any other topoisomerase I inhibitors.

Treatment and study plan

rovalpituzumab tesirine

Drug

Powder for solution for infusion in vials.

Other names: Rova-T

Topotecan

Drug

Powder or solution for infusion in vials. Topotecan is commercially available as both a powder and solution for infusion. Availability will vary by region.

Dexamethasone

Drug

Oral tablet.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: From randomization until the end of study; median time on follow-up was 20 and 20.6 months for the topotecan and rovalpituzumab tesirine arms, respectively.

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants were censored at the last date they were documented alive. After the End of treatment, survival information was collected at approximately 6-week intervals (or as requested by sponsor to support data analysis) continuing until the endpoint of death, the participant became lost to follow-up, AbbVie terminated the study, or until 12 February 2020. Calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From randomization until the end of study; median time on follow-up was 20 and 20.6 months for the topotecan and rovalpituzumab tesirine arms, respectively.

    PFS is defined as the number of months from the date of randomization until the date of first progression or the date of a participant's death, whichever occurs first. If a participant neither experienced disease progression nor died, then the participant's data were censored at the last date of radiographic assessment that they were documented to be progression free. Calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

    Radiographic tumor assessments for response were conducted by CT scanning according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm taking as reference the smallest lesion size recorded since the treatment started (baseline or after), or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

  2. Change From Baseline of the Physical Functioning Scale Score in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 15-Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) at Week 7

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

    The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL is an abbreviated 15-item version of the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) developed for use in palliative care. The score of 'physical functioning scale' score ranges from 0 (very poor) to 100 (excellent).

  3. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Time frame: Radiographic tumor assessments were conducted at baseline, every 6 weeks for 30 weeks, then every 9 weeks until progression or death; median time on follow-up was 20 and 20.6 months for the topotecan and rovalpituzumab tesirine arms, respectively.

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response is either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments for response were conducted by CT scanning, and assessed from the date of randomization until disease progression or death, whichever came first. Any participant who did not meet CR or PR, including those who did not have post-baseline radiological assessments were considered non-responders.

    CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

  4. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

    Time frame: Radiographic tumor assessments were conducted at baseline, every 6 weeks for 30 weeks, then every 9 weeks until progression or death; median time on follow-up was 20 and 20.6 months for the topotecan and rovalpituzumab tesirine arms, respectively.

    CBR is defined as percentage of participants whose best overall response is CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments for response were conducted by CT scanning, and assessed from the date of randomization until disease progression or death, whichever came first. Any participant who did not meet CR, PR, or SD, including those who did not have post-baseline radiological assessments were considered as experiencing no clinical benefit.

    CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

  5. Duration of Objective Response (DOR)

    Time frame: Radiographic tumor assessments were conducted at baseline, every 6 weeks for 30 weeks, then every 9 weeks until progression or death; median time on follow-up was 20 and 20.6 months for the topotecan and rovalpituzumab tesirine arms, respectively.

    DOR is defined as the time between the date of first response (CR or PR, whichever is recorded first) to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST version 1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. Radiographic tumor assessments for response were conducted by CT scanning, and assessed from the date of randomization until disease progression or death, whichever came first. Any participant who did not meet CR or PR, including those who did not have post-baseline radiological assessments were considered non-responders.

    CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine Compared With Topotecan for Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic DLL3high Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Who Have First Disease Progression During or Following Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (TAHOE)

Acronym: TAHOE

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Feb 23, 2017
Registry last updated
Feb 23, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.