Austin Hospital
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
NCT Number: NCT00912184
This trial aims to study the effect of combining continuous and a new polyamide membrane with larger pores in the treatment of critically ill patients with acute renal failure and low blood pressure (shock) requiring noradrenaline. The investigators wish to compare the clinical effect of this new therapy to that of haemofiltration with a standard membrane.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
During acute renal failure, small and middle molecular-weight toxins accumulate. These molecules are difficult to remove by standard haemofiltration. Accordingly, they accumulate and contribute to morbidity in long-term dialysis patients. Molecules such as cytokines have been shown to play a central pathogenic role in critical illness. In critically ill acute renal failure patients, they accumulate in serum and likely contribute to much morbidity (fever, low blood pressure, myocardial dysfunction, renal failure itself etc.) Therefore, the removal of cytokines appears desirable. Although different approaches have been undertaken, all have had limited success due to complexity, limited efficacy or uncertain clinical response [10-15].
It is possible that in using a different and more porous membrane, the removal of cytokines would be much more efficient and that clinical benefits of blood purification would, therefore, be greater.
A membrane of this kind is now available. It is a modification (moderate increase in pore size) of another standard material called polyamide, which has already been used in millions of people for dialysis and haemofiltration. The increased pore size of these new membranes is directed at a more effective removal of middle molecular-weight toxins such as cytokines.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard haemofiltration; CVVH; blood flow 200 ml/min, ultrafiltrate 25 ml/kg/hr, anticoagulation as clinically indicated, bicarbonate buffered replacement fluid
Other names: High flux membrane
CVVH with standard haemofiltration settings; blood flow 200 ml/min, ultrafiltrate 25 ml/kg/hour, anticoagulation as clinically indicated, bicarbonate-buffered replacement fluid
Other names: P2SH, Super high flux membrane
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Austin Health
Other Gov
Pilot Randomised Controlled Study Comparing The Effect of High Cut-off Point Haemofiltration With Standard Haemofiltration In Patients With Acute Renal Failure
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02558166
Acute Kidney Injury, Cardiogenic Shock
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05384899
Acute Kidney Failure, Acute Kidney Injury
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03635385
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Marseille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03476460
Acute Kidney Injury, Cardiovascular Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial Details