Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01251107

Study Comparing ABVD vs BEACOPP in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma

The choice of a preferred first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related effects. To fully assess this balance, the treatment decision process should ideally take into account the outcome following a consistent second-line therapy, in particular when tolerated, widely applicable and highly effective salvage regimens exist, like in Hodgkin lymphoma failing initial chemotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

17 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale di Tumori di Milano

Milan, Italy

About this study

During the last two decades ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) has been considered as the standard of care for advanced HL, however 20-30% of the patients fail to achieve a durable complete remission and need a salvage treatment. After a state-of-the art-salvage program including high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (ASCT) at least half of these patients achieve a durable disease control. Recently the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) has developed a new regimen, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone), administered with or without dose escalation. In an interim analysis after 23 months follow-up, BEACOPP demonstrated a higher activity compared to COPP/ABVD with a superior freedom from treatment failure (84% versus 75%, P=.034). Despite the improved efficacy a substantial proportion of patients receiving escalated BEACOPP experienced severe acute hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4 leucopoenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 78% , 36% and 27% of the cycles administered, respectively) and 1.8% fatal acute toxicities were reported. Moreover of greater concern is the incidence of almost fatal secondary acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (3 cases in 323 patients). The choice of first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related toxicities. Long-term outcome following an optimal salvage treatment, consisting in high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT should also be taken into consideration. In the present study we plan to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two therapeutic strategies consisting in two different first-line treatments followed by a pre-planned salvage program, when indicated

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma (pathological review diagnosis available)
  • No prior treatment
  • Stage II B, III A and B, IV A and B
  • Normal hematopoietic function as measured by leucocytes equal to or greater than 3500/mm3, neutrophils equal to or greater than 1500/mm3, platelets equal to or greater than 100000/mm3
  • Normal renal function (serum creatinine < 1,5x ULN) and normal liver function (SGOT/SGPT equal to or lower than 2.5x ULN; bilirubin equal to or lower than 1.5x ULN)
  • No significant history or current evidence of cardiovascular disease, or major respiratory disease
  • No severe neurologic or psychiatric disease
  • No other malignancy except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and/or in situ cervical carcinoma of the uterus
  • Serological negativity for hepatitis B or C or HIV infection
  • ECOG performance status equal to or lower than 2
  • Life expectancy of at least three months
  • Effective contraception in all patients and a negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential
  • Written informed consent and consent to a regular follow-up in the outpatient clinic

Exclusion criteria

  • Sever central nervous system or psychiatric disease
  • History or current evidence of clinically significant cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction or severe arrhythmias. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% at rest by echocardiography or < 55% by isotopic measurement
  • Serological positivity for HBV, HCV or HIV
  • History or current evidence of malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Lactating or pregnant women

Treatment and study plan

Bleomycin

Drug

10 mg/m2 IV day 8 during cycles 1 to 8

Other names: Bleomicina Teva

etoposide

Drug

200 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 1 to 4; 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 5 to 8

Other names: VP-16, Etoposide Teva

Doxorubicin

Drug

35 mg/2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 25 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8

Other names: Adriblastina Pfizer

Cyclophosphamide

Drug

1250 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 650 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8

Other names: Endoxan Baxter

Vincristine

Drug

1.4 mg/m2 iv (max 2 mg) on day 8 during cycles 1 to 8

Other names: Vincristina Teva Italia

Procarbazine

Drug

100 mg/m2 po from day 1 to 7 during cycles 1 to 8

Other names: Natulan

Prednisone

Drug

40 mg/m2 po from day 1 to 14 during cycles 1 to 8

Other names: Deltacortene

Vinblastine

Drug

6 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle

Other names: Velbe

Dacarbazine

Drug

375 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle

Other names: Dacarbazina Medac

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom from first progression at 5 years

    Time frame: After a median of 5 years from start of the study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Freedom from second progression at 5 years

    Time frame: After a median of 5 years from start of protocol

  2. Overall survival at 5 years

    Time frame: After a median of 5 years from start of the protocol

  3. Number of participants with acute adverse events at initial therapy and at salvage therapy as a measure of safety and tolerability

    Time frame: After 3 months from last intervention

  4. Number of participants long term sequelae

    Time frame: After a median of 10 years

    Number of participants who developed leukemia Number of participants who developed solid tumors Number of participants who developed cardiovascular disease

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Michelangelo

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized Comparison of ABVD Versus BEACOPP Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Advanced Stage or Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL)

Important dates

Study start
2000
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Dec 1, 2010
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.