Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale di Tumori di Milano
Milan, Italy
NCT Number: NCT01251107
The choice of a preferred first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related effects. To fully assess this balance, the treatment decision process should ideally take into account the outcome following a consistent second-line therapy, in particular when tolerated, widely applicable and highly effective salvage regimens exist, like in Hodgkin lymphoma failing initial chemotherapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me17 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Milan, Italy
During the last two decades ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) has been considered as the standard of care for advanced HL, however 20-30% of the patients fail to achieve a durable complete remission and need a salvage treatment. After a state-of-the art-salvage program including high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (ASCT) at least half of these patients achieve a durable disease control. Recently the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) has developed a new regimen, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone), administered with or without dose escalation. In an interim analysis after 23 months follow-up, BEACOPP demonstrated a higher activity compared to COPP/ABVD with a superior freedom from treatment failure (84% versus 75%, P=.034). Despite the improved efficacy a substantial proportion of patients receiving escalated BEACOPP experienced severe acute hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4 leucopoenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 78% , 36% and 27% of the cycles administered, respectively) and 1.8% fatal acute toxicities were reported. Moreover of greater concern is the incidence of almost fatal secondary acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (3 cases in 323 patients). The choice of first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related toxicities. Long-term outcome following an optimal salvage treatment, consisting in high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT should also be taken into consideration. In the present study we plan to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two therapeutic strategies consisting in two different first-line treatments followed by a pre-planned salvage program, when indicated
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
10 mg/m2 IV day 8 during cycles 1 to 8
Other names: Bleomicina Teva
200 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 1 to 4; 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 5 to 8
Other names: VP-16, Etoposide Teva
35 mg/2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 25 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8
Other names: Adriblastina Pfizer
1250 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 650 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8
Other names: Endoxan Baxter
1.4 mg/m2 iv (max 2 mg) on day 8 during cycles 1 to 8
Other names: Vincristina Teva Italia
100 mg/m2 po from day 1 to 7 during cycles 1 to 8
Other names: Natulan
40 mg/m2 po from day 1 to 14 during cycles 1 to 8
Other names: Deltacortene
6 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle
Other names: Velbe
375 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle
Other names: Dacarbazina Medac
Time frame: After a median of 5 years from start of the study
Time frame: After a median of 5 years from start of protocol
Time frame: After a median of 5 years from start of the protocol
Time frame: After 3 months from last intervention
Time frame: After a median of 10 years
Number of participants who developed leukemia Number of participants who developed solid tumors Number of participants who developed cardiovascular disease
Fondazione Michelangelo
Other
Prospective Randomized Comparison of ABVD Versus BEACOPP Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Advanced Stage or Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01657331
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01868451
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Hodgkin Disease
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03434730
Acute Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02362997
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details