Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo optional collection of blood
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT05890352
This phase 2 trial studies the side effects and best dose of tazemetostat and zanubrutinib in combination with tafasitamab and lenalidomide, and to see how well these combinations work in treating patients with large B-cell lymphoma that returned or did not respond to earlier treatment. Tazemetostat is in a class of medications called EZH2 inhibitors. It helps to stop the spread of cancer cells. Zanubrutinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of the abnormal protein that signals cancer cells to multiply. This helps stop the spread of cancer cells. tafasitamab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Lenalidomide is in a class of medications called immunomodulatory agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. The addition of tazemetostat or zanubrutinib to tafasitamab and lenalidomide may be able to shrink the cancer or extend the time without cancer symptoms coming back.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Banner University Medical Center - Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the recommended phase II dose of tafasitamab + lenalidomide + tazemetostat AND of tafasitamab + lenalidomide + zanubrutinib. (Safety Run-in) II. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) treated with tafasitamab + lenalidomide + tazemetostat vs control (tafasitamab + lenalidomide) AND treated with tafasitamab + lenalidomide + zanubrutinib versus (vs) control. (Randomized Phase II Study)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the hazard ratio for PFS for control vs. tafasitamab + lenalidomide + tazemetostat in germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB (activated B-cell [ABC]/unclassified) subsets.
II. To estimate the hazard ratio for PFS for control vs. tafasitamab + lenalidomide + zanubrutinib in GCB and non-GCB (ABC/unclassified) subsets.
III. To estimate progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), partial response rate (PR), duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment.
IV. To evaluate adverse events within each treatment arm.
OTHER OBJECTIVES:
I. To explore PFS within subgroups defined by molecular profile (e.g., MCD, BN2, N1 and EZB) and genetic subtypes.
II. To explore PFS in the tafasitamab-lenalidomide control arm vs that in matched historical control from L-MIND and realMIND studies.
III. To assess frailty (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale [CIRS] and Timed Get Up and Go [TUG]) and its correlation with outcome.
PRIMARY PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare patient-reported lymphoma-specific symptoms as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Trial Outcome Index sub-scale at 3 months after randomization between the control arm and each experimental arm (Arm 1 versus Arm 2 and Arm 3 versus Arm 2).
SECONDARY PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare participant-reported toxicity (treatment side effect) symptoms using selected Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) items between experimental vs control arms.
EXPLORATORY PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare patient-reported quality of life using the FACT-General (G) subscale score and the FACT-Lym total score at 3 months after randomization between the control arm and each experimental arm.
II. To compare quality of life over time between treatment arms from baseline to 12 months after randomization as measured by the FACT-Lym trial outcome index (TOI), FACT-G, and FACT-Lym total score using longitudinal analysis.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of tazemetostat and zanubrutinib.
PART I (SAFETY RUN-IN): Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms per treating investigator's choice.
ARM I: Patients receive tafasitamab intravenously (IV), lenalidomide orally (PO), and tazemetostat PO on study. Patients also undergo positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans throughout the trial. Patients also have the option to undergo collection of blood samples during screening and on study.
ARM III: Patients receive tafasitamab IV, lenalidomide PO, and zanubrutinib PO on study. Patients also undergo PET/CT and CT or MRI scans throughout the trial. Patients also have the option to undergo collection of blood samples during screening and on study.
PART II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive tafasitamab IV, lenalidomide PO, and tazemetostat PO on study. Patients also undergo PET/CT and CT or MRI scans throughout the trial. Patients also have the option to undergo collection of blood samples during screening and on study.
ARM II: Patients receive tafasitamab IV and lenalidomide PO on study. Patients also undergo PET/CT and CT or MRI scans throughout the trial. Patients also have the option to undergo collection of blood samples during screening and on study.
ARM III: Patients receive tafasitamab IV, lenalidomide PO, and zanubrutinib PO on study. Patients also undergo PET/CT and CT or MRI scans throughout the trial. Patients also have the option to undergo collection of blood samples during screening and on study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo optional collection of blood
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo PET/CT and CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Given PO
Other names: CC-5013, CC5013, CDC 501, Revlimid
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo PET/CT
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, PT
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Given IV
Other names: Immunoglobulin, Anti-(Human Cd19 Antigen) (Human-mus musculus Monoclonal MOR00208 Heavy Chain), Disulfide with Human-mus musculus Monoclonal MOR00208 .Kappa.-chain, Dimer, Monjuvi, MOR-00208, MOR00208, MOR208, Tafasitamab-cxix, XmAb5574
Given PO
Other names: E7438, EPZ-6438, EPZ6438
Given PO
Other names: BGB-3111, Brukinsa, BTK-InhB
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first observation of progressive disease according to the 2014 Lugano classification, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Will be compared between participants randomized to control Arm 2 (tafasitamab + lenalidomide) versus (vs) experimental Arm 1 (tafasitamab + lenalidomide + tazemetostat), AND control Arm 2 vs experimental Arm 3 (tafasitamab + lenalidomide + zanubrutinib), respectively.
Time frame: Baseline up to 3 months after randomization
Will compare the trial outcome index (TOI) score between each experimental arm (Arm 1 and Arm 3) to the control arm (Arm 2). The TOI score is composed of the Physical Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and lymphoma-specific subscale scores. The scores range from 0-116, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will calculate the 80% confidence interval (CI) for the Cox regression time-to-event estimate of the hazard ratio associated with addition of tazemetostat to tafasitamab+lenalidomide combination (Arm 2 vs Arm 1) in the GCB subgroup. If the confidence interval excludes 1, then 80% CI will be calculated for the non-GCB group.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will calculate the 80% CI for the hazard ratio associated with addition of zanubrutinib to tafasitamab+lenalidomide combination (Arm 2 vs Arm 3) in the non-GCB subgroup. If the confidence interval excludes 1, then 80% CI will be calculated for the GCB group.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first observation of progressive disease according to the 2014 Lugano classification, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: From date of first documentation of response to treatment (CR, PR) to date of first documentation of progression, or death due to any cause among patients who achieve a response (CR or PR), assessed up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first occurrence of EFS event, assessed up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Will estimate in GCB and non-GCB LBCL for each treatment. Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and 80% confidence interval will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will be evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5. Eligible participants receiving at least one dose of drug will be included in the assessment of adverse events by treatment arms. The maximum Grade for each toxicity will be recorded for each participant, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine toxicity patterns. With 60 eligible participants in each arm, any toxicity occurring with at least 5% probability is likely to be seen at least once (95% chance). Toxicity rates in each arm can be estimated to within at least +/- 13% with 95% confidence.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Crystal Miwa
CONTACT
Katarina Gasic
CONTACT
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
Randomized Phase II Study of the Addition of Targeted Therapeutic Agents to Tafasitamab-Based Therapy in Non-Transplant-Eligible Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05633615
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03150329
Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07714421
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04799275
Ann Arbor Stage III Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage IIX (Bulky) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details