Mindfulness Training
BehavioralGuided mindfulness meditation and stress management training
NCT Number: NCT02888600
This study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing two 8-week stress management programs for reducing inflammation and improving well-being among older adults.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year–93 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
A growing body of literature has demonstrated how stress can affect social relationships, health, and well-being during the aging process. Here, the investigators will test how two different programs can be used to facilitate healthy aging by helping individuals manage stress. One program will teach participants mindfulness meditation techniques while the other will educate participants about how to manage their health.
N=188 older adults will visit the study's central laboratory for a baseline visit and complete several days of daily experience sampling before being randomized into one of the two 8-week stress management programs. Participants will complete several days of daily experience sampling at the midpoint and conclusion of the intervention before returning to a study site to complete a follow-up assessment at both 1-week and 3-months after the end of the program.
This project will provide important information about how each training program can be used to promote well-being, health, and better social functioning in older adults. This work will ultimately inform the design of more efficacious and efficient stress-management interventions to facilitate healthy aging.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Guided mindfulness meditation and stress management training
Guided health education and stress management training
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Measured via blood samples
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Evaluated using ecological momentary assessment
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using UCLA loneliness scale and ecological momentary assessment
Time frame: 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Questionnaire assessing the frequency in which participants notice a variety of positive, neutral, and negative experiences and their reactivity to those experiences during a 5-minute resting state period
Time frame: Change from baseline to intervention weeks 4 and 8
Assessed via a dot memory ambulatory smartphone-based task administered at six timepoints per day, for three days in a row, at baseline and at Intervention weeks 4 and 8
Time frame: 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assessed via an Implicit Association Test (IAT) behaviorally quantifying the association between self and acceptance/judgment
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated by questionnaires asking about diet, caffeine consumption, alcohol use, stress reduction, exercise, recreational drug use, cold or flu, flu shots
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Beck Depression Inventory
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Mindful Attention Awareness Scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Nature Connection Scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using NEO Personality Inventory
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Social Network Index and Interpersonal Support Evaluation List
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Stanford Measure of Actual, Ideal, and Avoided Affect
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Cook-Medley Hostility Scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Adult Attachment Scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assessed via stimulated IL-6 production and glucocorticoid resistance
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assessed via telomeres and telomerase
Time frame: Assessed at 3-month follow-up only
Assessed via hair sample
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed via ecological momentary assessment
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed via ecological momentary assessment
Time frame: Assessed daily throughout the eight-week intervention period
Assessed by self-reported practice length, enjoyment of practice, usefulness of practice, trouble concentrating, mental fatigue, stress, and irritation during practice.
Time frame: Assessed prior to beginning of intervention, during Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed by optimism about treatment and expectations for treatment outcome,
Time frame: Assessed prior to beginning of intervention, during Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed by self-report ratings of patient-provider connection
Time frame: Change from baseline through intervention to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Assessed by self-report ratings of sleep using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Assessed by blood pressure cuffs in lab
Time frame: 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Assessed by speed of walking at a normal pace
Time frame: Change from baseline to intervention weeks 4 and 8
Assessed via a symbol search ambulatory smartphone-based task administered at six timepoints per day, for three days in a row, at baseline and at Intervention weeks 4 and 8
Time frame: 1-week post-intervention
Emotional Stroop task with negative social, negative non-social, positive social, and positive non-social words
Time frame: 1-week post-intervention
A social memory task assessing event recall based on event sociality (collective, interpersonal, and individual) and valence (positive and negative)
Time frame: 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assessed via a dichotic listening task
Carnegie Mellon University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05433662
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07702682
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Elâzığ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04680611
Adjustment, Adjustment, Emotional
Aberdeen, Grampian, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07690553
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial Details