Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01061255

Stress and Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students

Solving a problem in ambulatory setting may contain peripheral stress due to socio-evaluative stressors (patient's expectations about explanations) and task contingent stress due to time pressure, the necessity to take into account patient's mood, to deal with uncertainty of their own data collection and with complex clinical situations. In France, excepted for family medicine, undergraduate medical students and residents are currently not trained to perform consultations and are never exposed to ambulatory patients during training. The investigators postulate that this lack of practice may generate a significant state of stress during the first consultations and consequently modify or even impair clinical reasoning.

The primary objective of this study is to compare subjective and physiological levels of acute stress in ambulatory versus hospitalization setting in medical students confronted to a real patient with a diagnostic problem.

Measures: The French version of the Anxiety Spielberger test is administered just before and after each problem solving session.

Cortisol salivary samples are taken before and after each problem solving session. Salivary cortisol levels have been shown to be correlated to stressful situations and some personality traits but with some difference according to gender.

Cognitive appraisal (threat/challenge) is assessed before and after the tasks by the ratio of primary appraisal to secondary appraisal according to Tomaka et al.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nantes University Hospital

Nantes, France

About this study

Participants and Method:

Year 6 medical students who attend a one-month full-time course in an Internal Medicine Department are eligible.

Since no consultations in the ambulatory setting are currently structured for medical students, the following adjustments have been done within the internal medicine consultation department, with the approval of the department director:

  • the consultation duration has been increased (1 hour instead of 30 minutes)
  • during the first 30 minutes, consultation is performed by the participant
  • during the following 30 minutes, the patient is examined by his/her own physician.
  • The consent of the patient has been obtained by phone (prior to the consultation).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Year 6 medical students who attend a one-month full-time course in an Internal Medicine Department

Exclusion criteria

  • Student who repeats his year 6 of medicine
  • Student treated with corticoids

Treatment and study plan

Evaluation of the stress

Other

Medical Students having to solve a medical problem in ambulatory setting (studied group) vs. in hospitalisation setting (control group).

Measures: The French version of the Anxiety Spielberger test is administered just before and after each problem solving session.

Cortisol salivary samples are taken before and after each problem solving session. Salivary cortisol levels have been shown to be correlated to stressful situations and some personality traits but with some difference according to gender.

Primary outcomes

  1. Increase in salivary cortisol and in Spielberger score

    Time frame: one hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in the cognitive appraisal (challenge or threat)

    Time frame: one hour

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Physiological and Psychological Responses to Stress in Year 6 Medical Students Faced to Ambulatory Symptomatic Patients

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Feb 3, 2010
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.