Multimodality information comprehension
BehavioralEvaluate various aspects of multimodality presentation of materials through text-to-speech systems used by people with aphasia.
NCT Number: NCT03312270
People with aphasia often understand spoken utterances better than written sentences. They also benefit from having content appear in multiple rather than single modalities. Because text-to-speech (TTS) systems accommodate both of these functions, it provides an ideal basis for a reading intervention. TTS systems convert written text to provide both text and auditory information. Research about using TTS supports with people with aphasia has not extended beyond basic case studies and our studies of sentence level comprehension. Hence, no evidence exists about varying TTS features-such as speech output, speech rate, and text highlighting-known to benefit others with reading problems. Also, social acceptance of TTS is not well understood, even though it is critical to adoption and long-term use of the technology.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate various aspects of multimodality presentation of material through TTS systems used by people with aphasia. The immediate outcome of the proposed research will be evidence-based recommendations for selecting and adjusting TTS systems and features. This work will enable clinicians to maximize benefits for adults with varying aphasia profiles. We also will obtain initial evidence about the social validity and perceived value of TTS system use for this population.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States
Experimental Procedures
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Evaluate various aspects of multimodality presentation of materials through text-to-speech systems used by people with aphasia.
Time frame: 4 sessions, 9 minutes each over the course of 1 month
Participants will answer questions after listening and/or reading stories
Time frame: Up to 5 sessions, 90 minutes each over the course of 1 month
Read stories, answer multiple choice questions. Identify feature preferences.
Time frame: 1 session lasting up to 2 hours
Participants will learn about text-to-speech systems and complete interview about preferences
Miami University
Other
Strategies to Accommodate Reading (STAR): Using Assistive Technology to Support Reading by People With Aphasia.
Acronym: STAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06364709
Anomia, Aphasia
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01927302
Agrammatism, Agraphia
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06891638
Aphasia, Brain Diseases
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05570578
Aphasia, Brain Diseases
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
View Trial Details