Cryoablation
DevicePulmonary vein isolation via ablation with cryoballoon catheter
Other names: ArcticFront Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter
NCT Number: NCT03118518
To provide data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the Arctic Front Advance™ Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter for the treatment of recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, without the requirement that the subjects be drug refractory.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Subjects with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with no history of treatment with anti-arrhythmic drugs are randomized 1:1 to either an anti-arrhythmic drug or pulmonary vein isolation using the cryoballoon catheter.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pulmonary vein isolation via ablation with cryoballoon catheter
Other names: ArcticFront Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter
Antiarrhythmic drug initiation
Time frame: Randomization to 12 months
Treatment success after AAD initiation (control arm) or pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure utilizing the Arctic Front Advance™ Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter (treatment arm). Treatment success is the opposite of treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as any of the following:
Time frame: Randomization to 12 months
Measured by rate of composite list of serious adverse events in cryoablation-treated as randomized arm.
Includes:
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Months
There are two hypotheses tested in the objective, with separate hypothesis tests for (1) the difference in composite scores from the AFEQT questionnaire taken at baseline and 12 month visits, and (2) for the difference in composite scores for the EQ-5D questionnaire taken at baseline and 12-month visits.
Composite AFEQT score is on a scale of zero to one hundred. Higher scores are better.
Composite EQ-5D score is on a scale of zero to one. Higher scores are better.
Time frame: Initial treatment through 12 months.
Compare health care utilization between the treatment and control arms. There are two hypotheses tested in the objective, with separate hypothesis tests for: (1) the rate of total health care utilization events (cardiovascular-related hospitalizations, emergency room visits, or unscheduled office visits) over 12 months shown as freedom from cardiovascular health care utilization by treatment arm, and (2) freedom from cardioversions (electrical or pharmacological) over 12 months by treatment arm.
Medtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions
Industry
Acronym: STOP AF First
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05229211
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details