Istituto Ortopedico G. Pini
Milan, Milano, 20122, Italy
NCT Number: NCT01978275
Stimulating catheters have been introduced to reduce the incidence of secondary failure after continuous peripheral nerve blocks, but they effectiveness over traditional nonstimulating catheters is still controversial. Furthermore no volume-response study has compared the success rates of the two techniques for continuous lumbar plexus block. The aim of this prospective, randomized, blinded study is to detect if stimulating catheters decrease the minimal effective volume (MEAV) of 1.5% mepivacaine required for successful lumbar plexus block (LPB) in 50% of patients compared with conventional non-stimulating catheters.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Milan, Milano, 20122, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
simulating catheter
nonstimulating catheter
Time frame: thirty minutes after local anesthetic injection
Time frame: intraoperatively
ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO
Other
Are Stimulating Catheters More Efficacy for Lumbar Plexus Block Compared With Traditional Non-stimulating Ones? A Randomized, Prospective, Blinded, up and Down Study.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.