Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07281586

Step-down Therapy After Long-term Osteoporosis Treatment

Maintaining bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) is a major clinical challenge, as rapid bone loss commonly occurs when treatment is stopped, especially after more than three years of use. Standard sequential therapy with bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (Aclasta) often fails to fully prevent BMD decline, and most bone loss occurs within the first year, making effective suppression of the rebound effect essential.

This study investigates whether a de-escalation strategy-using half-dose denosumab (30 mg every six months) combined with sequential zoledronic acid-can better preserve lumbar spine BMD after long-term denosumab therapy. Eligible participants include postmenopausal women and men ≥50 years old with osteoporosis or osteopenia-related fractures who have received ≥3 years of denosumab.

The open-label trial applies stratified randomization based on denosumab duration (<4 years vs. ≥4 years), assigning 22 participants to each group.

Control group: standard therapy with one zoledronic acid infusion at the end of denosumab's effect and a second infusion one year later.

Intervention group: half-dose denosumab plus zoledronic acid at study entry, a second half-dose denosumab injection at six months, and a second zoledronic acid infusion at twelve months.

The study aims to determine whether this combined tapering-plus-bisphosphonate approach more effectively prevents lumbar spine BMD loss compared with conventional sequential therapy.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

50 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch

Douliu, Taiwan, 640

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Shau-Huai Fu

CONTACT

[email protected]

0972655734

About this study

Effective maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) remains a major clinical challenge. Although denosumab is highly effective in increasing BMD, patients frequently discontinue therapy due to issues such as adherence, comorbidities, or personal circumstances. This interruption can lead to rapid and profound bone loss, substantially increasing fracture risk. Current clinical consensus recommends follow-on bisphosphonate therapy-most commonly alendronate (Fosamax) or zoledronic acid (Aclasta)-after the pharmacologic effect of denosumab wears off. However, evidence indicates that in patients treated with denosumab for more than three years, conventional bisphosphonate transition alone is often insufficient to fully prevent post-discontinuation BMD decline. Importantly, most bone loss occurs within the first year after stopping denosumab, highlighting the urgent need for strategies that can suppress the rebound increase in bone turnover during this critical period.

This study aims to investigate whether a dose-reduction (de-escalation) strategy-administering half-dose denosumab (30 mg every six months) combined with sequential zoledronic acid therapy-can better preserve lumbar spine BMD after long-term denosumab treatment. The target population includes (1) postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia-associated fractures who have received at least three years of denosumab treatment, and (2) men aged ≥50 years with osteoporosis or osteopenia-associated fractures and ≥3 years of denosumab therapy.

The study uses an open-label, stratified randomized trial design. After enrollment, participants are stratified according to total duration of prior denosumab use: <4 years or ≥4 years. Within each stratum, participants are randomized into two groups, with 22 participants per group.

Control Group (Standard Sequential Therapy):

Participants receive conventional post-denosumab management. A single infusion of zoledronic acid is administered at the expected end of denosumab's pharmacologic effect, followed by a second zoledronic acid infusion one year later (±1 week).

Intervention Group (De-escalation + Bisphosphonate Strategy):

At study entry, participants receive a half-dose denosumab injection (expected duration of effect: six months) concurrently with one dose of zoledronic acid. Six months later (±1 week), participants receive a second half-dose denosumab injection. At twelve months after enrollment (±1 week), a second zoledronic acid infusion is administered.

This investigational regimen is designed to gradually taper denosumab exposure while simultaneously initiating bisphosphonate therapy to stabilize bone turnover. By providing partial RANKL inhibition during the early high-risk period and reinforcing mineralization with zoledronic acid, the study aims to determine whether this combined approach can more effectively mitigate the rebound effect and prevent lumbar spine BMD loss.

The results of this trial will help clarify whether a structured de-escalation plus bisphosphonate strategy offers superior protection compared with standard transition therapy in patients with long-term denosumab exposure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 and ≤85 years with osteoporosis- or osteopenia-related fractures who have received denosumab (Prolia) continuously for at least 3 years, with no dosing interval exceeding 9 months; and men aged ≥50 and ≤85 years with osteoporosis- or osteopenia-related fractures who have received continuous denosumab (Prolia) therapy for at least 3 years, with dosing intervals not exceeding 9 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Secondary osteoporosis Metabolic bone diseases Active or prior malignancy Ongoing systemic glucocorticoid therapy Current use of hormone replacement therapy Use of any medications that affect bone metabolism Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 mL/min/1.73 m² Known hypersensitivity to zoledronic acid Hypocalcemia Any other contraindications to zoledronic acid use

Treatment and study plan

Zoledronate

Drug

In the control arm, participants will receive zoledronate at trial entry, with a second dose administered at the start of the second year

Denosumab De-escalation

Drug

In the intervention arm, participants will receive a half-dose of denosumab at trial entry, followed by a second half-dose 6 months later during the first year.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lumbar Spine BMD Over 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Change in Lumbar Spine BMD Over 2 Years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Total hip BMD Over 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Change in Total hip BMD Over 2 Years

  2. Change in Femoral Neck BMD Over 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Change in Femoral Neck BMD Over 2 Years

  3. Change in C-terminal telopeptide Over 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Change in C-terminal telopeptide over 2 years, which reflects the level of bone resorption, will be used to assess how bone turnover responds to the intervention throughout the study period.

  4. Change in Procollagen Type I N-Propeptide Over 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 Years

    Change in Procollagen Type I N-Propeptide over 2 years, which reflects the level of bone formation, will be used to assess how bone turnover responds to the intervention throughout the study period.

  5. Incidence of clinical osteoporotic fracture

    Time frame: 2 years

    Incidence of clinical osteoporotic fracture

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Shau-Huai Fu, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+886972655734

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch

Registry information

Official study title

Step-down Therapy After Long-term Osteoporosis Treatment: A Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.