National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch
Douliu, Taiwan, 640
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07281586
Maintaining bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) is a major clinical challenge, as rapid bone loss commonly occurs when treatment is stopped, especially after more than three years of use. Standard sequential therapy with bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (Aclasta) often fails to fully prevent BMD decline, and most bone loss occurs within the first year, making effective suppression of the rebound effect essential.
This study investigates whether a de-escalation strategy-using half-dose denosumab (30 mg every six months) combined with sequential zoledronic acid-can better preserve lumbar spine BMD after long-term denosumab therapy. Eligible participants include postmenopausal women and men ≥50 years old with osteoporosis or osteopenia-related fractures who have received ≥3 years of denosumab.
The open-label trial applies stratified randomization based on denosumab duration (<4 years vs. ≥4 years), assigning 22 participants to each group.
Control group: standard therapy with one zoledronic acid infusion at the end of denosumab's effect and a second infusion one year later.
Intervention group: half-dose denosumab plus zoledronic acid at study entry, a second half-dose denosumab injection at six months, and a second zoledronic acid infusion at twelve months.
The study aims to determine whether this combined tapering-plus-bisphosphonate approach more effectively prevents lumbar spine BMD loss compared with conventional sequential therapy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Douliu, Taiwan, 640
Location status: Recruiting
Effective maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) remains a major clinical challenge. Although denosumab is highly effective in increasing BMD, patients frequently discontinue therapy due to issues such as adherence, comorbidities, or personal circumstances. This interruption can lead to rapid and profound bone loss, substantially increasing fracture risk. Current clinical consensus recommends follow-on bisphosphonate therapy-most commonly alendronate (Fosamax) or zoledronic acid (Aclasta)-after the pharmacologic effect of denosumab wears off. However, evidence indicates that in patients treated with denosumab for more than three years, conventional bisphosphonate transition alone is often insufficient to fully prevent post-discontinuation BMD decline. Importantly, most bone loss occurs within the first year after stopping denosumab, highlighting the urgent need for strategies that can suppress the rebound increase in bone turnover during this critical period.
This study aims to investigate whether a dose-reduction (de-escalation) strategy-administering half-dose denosumab (30 mg every six months) combined with sequential zoledronic acid therapy-can better preserve lumbar spine BMD after long-term denosumab treatment. The target population includes (1) postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia-associated fractures who have received at least three years of denosumab treatment, and (2) men aged ≥50 years with osteoporosis or osteopenia-associated fractures and ≥3 years of denosumab therapy.
The study uses an open-label, stratified randomized trial design. After enrollment, participants are stratified according to total duration of prior denosumab use: <4 years or ≥4 years. Within each stratum, participants are randomized into two groups, with 22 participants per group.
Control Group (Standard Sequential Therapy):
Participants receive conventional post-denosumab management. A single infusion of zoledronic acid is administered at the expected end of denosumab's pharmacologic effect, followed by a second zoledronic acid infusion one year later (±1 week).
Intervention Group (De-escalation + Bisphosphonate Strategy):
At study entry, participants receive a half-dose denosumab injection (expected duration of effect: six months) concurrently with one dose of zoledronic acid. Six months later (±1 week), participants receive a second half-dose denosumab injection. At twelve months after enrollment (±1 week), a second zoledronic acid infusion is administered.
This investigational regimen is designed to gradually taper denosumab exposure while simultaneously initiating bisphosphonate therapy to stabilize bone turnover. By providing partial RANKL inhibition during the early high-risk period and reinforcing mineralization with zoledronic acid, the study aims to determine whether this combined approach can more effectively mitigate the rebound effect and prevent lumbar spine BMD loss.
The results of this trial will help clarify whether a structured de-escalation plus bisphosphonate strategy offers superior protection compared with standard transition therapy in patients with long-term denosumab exposure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the control arm, participants will receive zoledronate at trial entry, with a second dose administered at the start of the second year
In the intervention arm, participants will receive a half-dose of denosumab at trial entry, followed by a second half-dose 6 months later during the first year.
Time frame: 2 Years
Change in Lumbar Spine BMD Over 2 Years
Time frame: 2 Years
Change in Total hip BMD Over 2 Years
Time frame: 2 Years
Change in Femoral Neck BMD Over 2 Years
Time frame: 2 Years
Change in C-terminal telopeptide over 2 years, which reflects the level of bone resorption, will be used to assess how bone turnover responds to the intervention throughout the study period.
Time frame: 2 Years
Change in Procollagen Type I N-Propeptide over 2 years, which reflects the level of bone formation, will be used to assess how bone turnover responds to the intervention throughout the study period.
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of clinical osteoporotic fracture
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Other
Step-down Therapy After Long-term Osteoporosis Treatment: A Randomized Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07325578
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06059222
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07677033
Atrophy, Bone Diseases
Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07677072
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details