Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo
Madrid, 28040, Spain
NCT Number: NCT03743168
Risk for falls has been associated with falls efficacy and postural balance. The objective was to compare the effects on the footprint and the stabilometry of the continuous stretch and the intermittent. Subjects were randomly assigned to an intermittent stretching protocol group or continuous stretch group both of them loading passive plantar flexor stretching. Static footprint and stabilometry were measured before and after both protocols.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intermittent stretching protocol of five sets of 1 minute and15 second rest
2 minutes continuous stretch
Time frame: Change from foot plantar pressure at 2 minutes
Maximum foot plantar pressure measured as K Pa
Universidad de León
Other
The Acute Effects of Intermittent Versus Continuous Bilateral Ankle Plantar Flexors Static Stretching on Postural Sway and Plantar Pressures During Standing
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.