Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07064811

Standardized Resistance Training Program and Assessment System for Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy ISPoRT-PCa-ADT Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. SPORT-MU

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel study arms evaluated the effectiveness of a 24-week exercise intervention in prostate cancer (PCa) patients under-going androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Hospital "Virgen de la Arrixaca" (Murcia, Spain). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) a supervised progressive resistance training program (SPoRT-PCa-ADT), or (2) a control group receiving a home-based exercise protocol following an initial assessment, accom-panied by weekly telephone follow-up. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 24 weeks to examine changes in physical, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. Addi-tionally, patient-reported outcomes were collected at the 12-week midpoint (Figure 1). This study design enabled the evaluation of both immediate and sustained intervention effects and facilitated a direct comparison between supervised and home-based exercise approaches

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

HCUVA

Murcia, 30120, Spain

Location contact

Alejandro Soler Lopez

CONTACT

[email protected]

Carlos Gómez Carmona

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Enrique Cao Avellaneda, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

968369500

Laura Herrero Vidal

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel study arms evaluated the effectiveness of a 24-week exercise intervention in prostate cancer (PCa) patients under-going androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Hospital "Virgen de la Arrixaca" (Murcia, Spain). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) a supervised progressive resistance training program (SPoRT-PCa-ADT), or (2) a control group receiving a home-based exercise protocol following an initial assessment, accom-panied by weekly telephone follow-up. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 24 weeks to examine changes in physical, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. Addi-tionally, patient-reported outcomes were collected at the 12-week midpoint (Figure 1). This study design enabled the evaluation of both immediate and sustained intervention effects and facilitated a direct comparison between supervised and home-based exercise approaches

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic prostate neoplasm and current treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
  • treatment at the radiotherapy oncology department of University Clinical Hospital "Virgen de la Arrixaca"
  • legal adult age with signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • unwillingness to participate in the study
  • inability to complete adequate follow-up due to any cause that would prevent knowledge of patient evolution during the follow-up period
  • no controlled or symptomatic metastatic bone disease
  • physical disabilities that would prevent participants from safely completing the exercise protocol

Treatment and study plan

Exercise Intervention Protocol

Procedure

Subjects participated in the supervised exercise program twice weekly (with a 48-72-hour interval between sessions) for 24 weeks, totaling 48 supervised sessions. The progressive resistance training program used velocity-based training principles [24-26], a novel approach in exercise oncology that allows for precise load management and indi-vidualization based on daily performance capacity

SPoRT-Control Intervention

Procedure

structured written instructions for a personalized home-based resistance training program. The protocol was designed to prioritize safety, progressive adaptation, and individualization based on each participant's functional capacity and available resources at home. The program was intended to be performed two to three times per week on non-consecutive days, focusing exclusively on lower-body training through a single primary movement. Each session consisted of three effective sets of 12 repetitions, which served as the standard training volume for the main exercise.

Primary outcomes

  1. Progressive loading test

    Time frame: Up for a 24 weeks

    squat (SQ) exercise to evaluate strength and velocity parameters. Participants performed the SQ starting from an upright position with knees and hips fully extended, feet parallel and shoulder-width apart, and the bar resting on the upper back at the acromion level. Each participant descended continuously until the top of the thighs were below the horizontal plane, with the posterior thighs and shins in contact (~35-40° knee flexion), then immediately reversed the movement to return to the upright position.

  2. Vertical jump test

    Time frame: up for 24 weeks

    In the countermovement jump (CMJ) test, participants performed five maximum CMJs with 20-second rests between jumps. Before CMJ evaluation, participants warmed up by performing two sets of 10 squats without external load, 5 submaximal CMJs, and 3 maximum CMJs. CMJ height was calculated from flight time values determined using a contact platform (Chronojump Boscosystem®, Barcelona, Spain). After discarding the highest and lowest CMJ heights, the resulting average was retained for further analysis. This test was employed as a measure of lower body power and neuromuscular function, which are commonly impaired in patients undergoing ADT.

  3. Maximum Isometric Contraction Test

    Time frame: up for 24 weeks

    Maximum isometric force (MIF) and maximum rate of force development (RFDmax) were measured during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) test in the squat (SQ) exercise with participants standing and knees flexed at 90° (180° = full exten-sion). This test was performed on a quadriceps extension machine. Participants were in-structed to push against the force platform as quickly and forcefully as possible following the "ready, set, go!" signal during two 5-second trials separated by 1-minute rests. External forces were recorded at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz and processed using specific software (Chronojump Boscosystem®, Barcelona, Spain). RFDmax was calculated as the maximum slope in the time-force curve over 20 ms intervals. Additionally, the average tangential slope of the time-force curve obtained at different time intervals (50, 100, and 150 ms from the onset of force production, RFD0-50, RFD0-100, and RFD0-150, respec-tively) was calculated. The average value of each var

  4. Fatigue assessment

    Time frame: Up for 24 weeks

    Cancer-related fatigue, one of the most common and debilitating side effects of cancer treatment and ADT, was assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). This validated 9-item questionnaire measures the severity of fatigue and its interference with daily activities. Scores are categorized as mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10) fatigue. The BFI has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in cancer populations and is sensitive to changes following exercise interventions

  5. Quality of Life Assessment

    Time frame: Up for a 24 weeks

    Quality of life was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. This 39-item instrument comprises the FACT-General (FACT-G) plus a prostate cancer subscale (PCS) that assesses concerns specific to prostate cancer and its treatment. The FACT-P evaluates physical wellbeing, social/family wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, functional wellbeing, and prostate cancer-specific concerns. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. This instrument has been extensively validated in prostate cancer populations and demonstrates good sensitivity to change following interventions

  6. Psychological Distress

    Time frame: Up for 24 weeks

    Psychological distress was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a 14-item questionnaire designed to identify anxiety and depression in patients with physical health problems. The scale produces separate scores for anxiety and depression. The HADS has been validated in cancer populations and is widely used in psycho-oncology research

  7. Urinary Function

    Time frame: Up for a 24 weeks

    Urinary function, which can be affected by both prostate cancer and its treatments, was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). This 8-item questionnaire evaluates the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and other conditions affecting urinary function in men. The total symptom score ranges from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Additionally, includes an ancillary query regarding the patient's quality of life related to urinary symptoms, thereby providing a comprehensive evaluation that supports both diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice

  8. Sleep Quality

    Time frame: Up for a 24 weeks

    Sleep disturbances are common in cancer patients and can significantly impact quality of life. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 19-item self-report questionnaire that evaluates sleep quality and disturbances over a one-month period

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alejandro Soler López

CONTACT

[email protected]

Enrique Cao Avellaneda, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

968369500

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias de la Region de Murcia

Other

Registry information

Acronym: SPORT-MU

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 15, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.