Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02598843

Standard Non Operative Treatment Versus Accelerated Rehabilitation of Achilles Tendon Ruptures

The purpose of this study is to directly compare traditional plaster treatment with early weightbearing in a walking boot for the non operative treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Royal Infirmary Edinburgh

Edinburgh, Lothian, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom

About this study

This injury has traditionally been treated in a plaster cast applied to the leg for a period of 10 weeks which allows the tendon to heal, or by an operation to repair the tendon. Research undertaken in the investigators department has shown that patients treated with surgery or with a plaster had similar chance of re-rupture of the tendon after treatment and gain a similar recovery. The investigators therefore now manage these injuries in a plaster.

More recently, further research has shown that a new type of non-surgical rehabilitation programme, which is quicker than the traditional non-surgical programme, gave a tendon re-rupture rate that was similar to that after surgical treatment. This new rehabilitation programme uses a walking boot fitted with a heel-raise (instead of the traditional plaster). The potential benefit of this quicker rehabilitation programme is that it allows the patient to put weight through the leg immediately, whereas patients treated with the traditional plaster cast non-surgical treatment cannot weight bear (this means that they are kept non-weightbearing and therefore have to use crutches) for the first 8 weeks. The time spent in the walking boot in this new, quicker rehabilitation programme is 8 weeks while that spent in plaster is 10 weeks. This new non-surgical, quicker rehabilitation programme is referred to as the accelerated non-surgical programme hereafter. There are no known increased risks with the accelerated rehabilitation programme.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 16-60 years old with an acute rupture of the Achilles tendon

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not have an acute rupture (ie. delayed presentation >2 weeks)
  • Patients who present with a re-rupture of a previously treated Achilles tendon
  • Patients from outside the Lothian (local treatment) area who are unwilling to attend follow-up at the study institution.
  • Latex allergy.

Treatment and study plan

Standard treatment protocol

Other

Cast Protocol 4 weeks in Full Equinus cast - Non Weight Bearing (NWB) with axillary crutches; 4 weeks in Semi-Equinus cast NWB with axillary crutches; 2 weeks in neutral cast - Full Weight Bearing (FWB); 2 weeks FWB out of cast, with shoe insert heel raise.

Followed by course of physiotherapy

Accelerated Rehabilitation

Other

4 weeks in Ossur Rebound walking boot with 3cm heel raise, worn continuously including in bed. Weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT)/FWB - crutches for balance; 2 weeks in Rebound walking boot with 1.5cm heel raise (WBAT/FWB - crutches for balance; 2 weeks in Rebound walking boot with foot in neutral. At 8 weeks, remove boot and allow FWB out of boot.

At 8 weeks after initiation of treatment, physiotherapy is commenced.

Primary outcomes

  1. SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire)

    Time frame: final followup/one year

    46 question score. Patients are asked to tick boxes labelled between 1 (indicating good function/no problems) and 5 (poor function/significant problems) for each question and the responses are used to calculate a "dysfunction index", a "bother index" and an "overall SMFA score". These will be reported for each group with measure of central tendency (mean/median) and standard deviations/interquartile range.

Secondary outcomes

  1. SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire)

    Time frame: At the initial review, upon enrolment in the study, patients are asked to complete the questionnaire detailing their immediate pre-injury status (ie status one day before injury). Then reassessed at 26 weeks.

    46 question score. Patients are asked to tick boxes labelled between 1 (indicating good function/no problems) and 5 (poor function/significant problems) for each question and the responses are used to calculate a "dysfunction index", a "bother index" and an "overall SMFA score". These will be reported for each group with measure of central tendency (mean/median) and standard deviations/interquartile range.

  2. Incidence of thromboembolic events

    Time frame: 1 year

    Incidence of radiologically confirmed thromboembolic events within one year of injury is to be reported for each group.

  3. Ankle and subtalar motion

    Time frame: 10, 26 and 52 weeks

    Ankle motion is to be measured using a goniometer for each patient while subtalar motion is to be clinically assessed. Range of motion will be reported for each group as measure of central tendency (median or mean) and standard deviation or interquartile range.

  4. Calf circumference

    Time frame: 10, 26 and 52 weeks

    Measured in centimetres at a point 11 centimetres below the tibial tuberosity. Both sides are measured and the affected (injured) side is compared to the unaffected (uninjured) side for each patient, yielding a relative calf circumference for the affected side. Relative circumference can then be compared across the two groups and reported for each group as a measure of central tendency along with standard deviation/interquartile range..

  5. Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain

    Time frame: Initial review, 4,8,10,26,52 weeks.

    VAS scored between 0 and 10. Patients asked to circle an integer between 0 and 10 to indicate their pain level, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. Scores to be reported for each group (arm of trial) as measure of central tendency (mean/median) and standard deviations/interquartile range.

  6. Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire

    Time frame: At the initial review, upon enrolment in the study, patients are asked to complete the questionnaire detailing their immediate pre-injury status (ie status one day before injury). Then reassessed at 26 and 52 weeks.

    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) questionnaire (August 2005 version based on version 2.0 Foot and Ankles Outcomes Instrument. This consists of 25 questions with patients asked to indicate the answer that best applies to their situation. Responses are used to calculate a score and scores for each group will be reported as a measure of central tendency (median/mean) with standard deviations/interquartile ranges.

  7. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

    Time frame: At the initial review, upon enrolment in the study, patients are asked to complete the questionnaire detailing their immediate pre-injury status (ie status one day before injury). Then reassessed at 26 and 52 weeks

    This is a validated score consisting of 10 questions scored 0 to 10 (whole numbers only) with 0 indicating no limitation and 10 indicating maximal limitation. Data to be analysed and presented as measure of central tendency (median/mean) and standard deviations/interquartile ranges for patients in each group.

  8. Return to work.

    Time frame: 10,26,52 weeks.

    Time to initial return to work activity measured in days from date of injury. To be reported as the measure of central tendency (mean or median) and standard deviation or interquartile range, for each group (arm of trial). Patients will be asked whether they have returned to work when reviewed at each of the review timepoints listed above, until they answer in the affirmative.

  9. Return to driving or public transport.

    Time frame: 10,26,52 weeks.

    Time to initial return to driving (or use of public transport if non-driver), measured in days from date of injury. To be reported as the measure of central tendency (mean or median) and standard deviation or interquartile range, for each group (arm of trial). Patients will be asked whether they have returned to these activities when reviewed at each of the review timepoints listed above, until they answer in the affirmative.

  10. Return to sport.

    Time frame: 10,26,52 weeks.

    Time to initial return to sporting activity (if applicable) measured in days from date of injury. To be reported as the measure of central tendency (mean or median) and standard deviation or interquartile range, for each group (arm of trial). Patients will be asked whether they have returned to sporting activities when reviewed at each of the review timepoints listed above, until they answer in the affirmative.

  11. Achilles tendon rerupture rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    Number of achilles tendon re-ruptures occuring in each group up to one year after injury.

  12. EQ-5D Index and EQ-5D VAS

    Time frame: Pre-injury and post-injury (completed at initial review), 26 weeks and 52 weeks

    The EQ-5D-5L consists of an EQ-5D index, calculated from scores for 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and the index ranges from -1 to +1. The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) asks patients to self-rate their health state on a scale between 0 and 100. Data to be analysed and presented as measure of central tendency (median/mean) and standard deviations/interquartile ranges for patients in each group. This data is collected for the final 41 patients in this study.

  13. Satisfaction Question

    Time frame: 10, 16, 26 and 52 weeks

    Patients asked "How satisfied are you with your treated ankle?". They must choose one of "Very satisfied"/"satisfied"/"neither satisfied nor dissatisfied"/"dissatisfied"/"very dissatisfied". Responses to be analysed as dichotomous data and ordinal data. This data is collected for the final 41 patients in this study.

  14. Patient Preference question

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    Patients asked "Did you have a preference for treatment type for your Achilles tendon injury?" (Choose one of: YES / NO). If Yes, then which modality would you have preferred? (choose one of CAST / BOOT ). Data will be cross tabulated for statistical analysis. This data is collected for the final 41 patients in this study.

  15. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

    Time frame: Post-injury (completed at initial review)

    As above. An additional time point (post-injury), to be completed at the initial review, was added for the final 41 patients in this study.

  16. SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire)

    Time frame: Post-injury (completed at initial review)

    As above. An additional time point (post-injury), to be completed at the initial review, was added for the final 41 patients in this study.

  17. Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire

    Time frame: Post-injury (completed at initial review)

    As above. An additional time point (post-injury), to be completed at the initial review, was added for the final 41 patients in this study.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NHS Lothian

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Functional Outcomes After Conservative Management of the Acutely Ruptured Achilles Tendon in the Under 60 Age Group. A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Standard Conservative Management With Accelerated Rehabilitation Using a Moon Boot

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 6, 2015
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.