Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05343793

Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)

The purpose of this study is to expand access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in specialty addiction programs in Washington State. Sixty-four addiction treatment programs will participate in an adaptive implementation strategy trial that uses a stagewise implementation-to-target (stepped "care" type) approach whereby organizations engage in increasingly intensive implementation strategies as needed. Organizations are moved to a follow-up/sustainment arm once they have met the implementation targets described below. The design also includes an external comparator arm, which consists of 510 addiction treatment programs that are not participating in the study and will mimic as study controls.

The sequence of implementation strategies are:

1. Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback 2. NIATx/MAT Academy 3. Randomization to either NIATx Internal Facilitation or NIATx External Facilitation 4. Assignment to NIATx External Facilitation if outcome targets are not achieved in the NIATx Internal Facilitation arm

Implementation targets are:

1. Reach - At least 75% of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving MOUD for three consecutive months 2. Adoption - At least 1 integrated MOUD prescriber actively prescribing MOUD 3. Implementation - a total score ≥ 4 on the Integrating Medications for Addiction Treatment (IMAT) Index.

Contextual moderators and mediators of performance on target outcomes as a function of the implementation strategy step will be examined, as will the costs associated with participation in the sequence of implementation strategies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Washington State Healthcare Authority

Olympia, Washington, 98501, United States

About this study

Principal Investigator: Mark McGovern, PhD, Stanford University; Principal Investigator: James H Ford II, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Site Principal Investigator: Tony Walton, MS, Washington State Health Care Authority

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Addiction treatment programs in Washington State
  • Residential (detoxification or rehabilitation) or outpatient (intensive outpatient or outpatient) levels of care
  • Primary care clinics, including Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Community Health Centers (CHCs)

Exclusion criteria

  • Opioid treatment programs

Treatment and study plan

Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback (EMF)

Other

Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback consists of performance data (reach, adoption, effectiveness, implementation) gathered and reported by the program on a quarterly basis. Data summaries for each program and in comparison to the entire sample, will be reflected back to participants, via dashboards, within one-month of data submission.

NIATx/MAT Academy

Other

This two-day workshop will provide participating clinics with rationale, clinical practice and program integration with MOUD (Day 1), and an overview of NIATx principles and tools (Day 2).

NIATx-Internal Facilitation (NIATx-IF)

Other

Internal facilitators will receive training (in-person or online) on how to provide coaching within their organization. For 9-months, Internal Facilitators (IFs) will: a) support teams to harness resources toward systemic change and improvement; b) employ a range of concepts and tools to provide individualized support to teams; c) help teams to practice and hone their skills to optimize performance, and d) focus on team relationships and communications.

NIATx-External Facilitation (NIATx-EF)

Other

For 9-months, organizations in the NIATx-EF study arm will work with one of 4 experienced consultant NIATx External Facilitators (EFs). The EF meets with clinic staff to plan change projects, review ongoing change efforts, discuss successes, and offer guidance on planning future change projects using PDSA cycles. The EF makes a 1-day site visit during the 1st quarter of the implementation period and leads monthly 1-hour phone calls.

Primary outcomes

  1. Reach

    Time frame: Quarterly ; Months 1 to 46

    The proportion of program patients with OUD and receiving MOUD (buprenorphine, naltrexone) within the index quarter.

  2. Adoption

    Time frame: Quarterly ; Months 1 to 46

    The number of integrated prescribers of buprenorphine and/or naltrexone, who are actively prescribing MOUD.

  3. Effectiveness

    Time frame: Quarterly ; Months 1 to 46

    Access: The proportion of patients prescribed MOUD who start the medication within 72 hours of diagnosis. For patients requiring detoxification for naltrexone, Access will be operationalized as the proportion of patients who start the medication within 72 hours of when it is safe or indicated by a physician. Retention: The proportion of patients who are retained in continuous care for at least 6-months from the start of medication, or if in time limited care situations (e.g., residential detoxification) for the entire treatment episode.

  4. Implementation - Integrating Medications for Addiction Treatment (IMAT) Index

    Time frame: Months 1,7,14,24,34,46

    The IMAT integrates MOUD guidelines, expert consensus recommendations, the OUD care cascade, and best practice information into a team-assessment benchmark measure of current and future state MOUD capability and practice. The IMAT is composed of 45 items, rated on a 1 to 5 scale from: 1- Not Integrated, to 3- Partially integrated, to 5- Fully integrated. Intermediate ratings of 2 and 4, are ratings not at either a 3 or 5 level respectively. The benchmark items address policy, practice and workforce factors, and are clustered into seven dimensions of: 1) Infrastructure; 2) Clinic culture and environment; 3) Patient identification and initiating care; 4) Care delivery and treatment response monitoring; 5) Care coordination; 6) Workforce; and, 7) Staff training and development. The IMAT Total Score is a composite rating from 1 to 5 of overall MOUD care quality. It takes between 1 to 2 hours to complete.

Other outcomes

  1. Contextual determinants

    Time frame: Months 1,7,14,24,34,46

    Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS). The IFASIS evaluates contextual aspects at baseline and over time. This measure focuses on four dimensions (Outer Context, Inner Context, Perception of Intervention, Perception of Patient/Client Experience). tHE IFASIS is a team-assessment measure completed by key staff in MOUD implementation. In addition to individual item scores, it generates a score for each of the four dimensions and in total.

  2. Engagement in implementation

    Time frame: Monthly ; Months 1 to 46

    Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC). The SIC is an 8-stage assessment tool designed to measure and compare implementation strategies for scaling up proven interventions. Stages range from Engagement (Stage 1) to achievement of program delivery with Competency (Stage 8). SIC data include a log of activities that operationalize the implementation process necessary to move toward successful program start-up and sustainment, and their completion dates. Two scores are calculated for each SIC stage. The Proportion score calculates the proportion of key activities completed within a stage. The Duration score is calculated by date of entry through date of final activity completed. The Duration Score can account for activities not completed sequentially and also for being in multiple stages at a given time. A third Final Stage score indicates the final stage achieved in the implementation process (Stage 1-8).

  3. Cost of implementation

    Time frame: Monthly ; Months 1 to 46

    Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS). Calculations of fees, expenses, and person hours necessary to complete each implementation stage.

  4. Fidelity

    Time frame: Months 7,14,24,34,46

    NIATx Fidelity. The NIATx Fidelity Scale is a 19-item observational measure of adherence to the NIATx model, rating activities on a 5-point scale from 1-No evidence to 5-Extensive evidence. Scoring reflects information obtained from IF and EF perspectives using a composite of interviews, review of walk-through results, change project forms, EF or IF notes and sustainability plans.

  5. Implementation climate

    Time frame: Months 1,7,14,24,34,46

    Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). Assesses the extent to which an organization prioritizes and values the implementation of an evidence based practice. Six subscales and 18 items scored on a 5-point scale from 0 - not at all, to 4 - very great extent

  6. Implementation Leadership

    Time frame: Months 1,7,14,24,34,46

    Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS). Assesses a leader's support for implementation of an evidence based practice. Four subscales and 12 items scored on a 5-point scale from 0 - not at all, to 4 - very great extent

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stanford University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  • University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Washington State Health Care Authority

Registry information

Acronym: SITT-MAT

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.