Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00919620

Stage-specific Case Management for Early Psychosis

One of the commonly adopted strategies in improving outcome in psychotic disorders is by focused, specific and intensive intervention in the initial few years of the disorder. However the effects of intervention and the optimal duration of intervention have seldom been examined in randomized studies. This study uses a randomized controlled study design to investigate the effectiveness of stage-specific case-management in improving outcome of first episode psychotic disorders. It also addresses whether two years of case-management is less effective than four years of case-management over a four year period. A total of 360 subjects, who aged 25 above, and diagnosed with first episode psychotic disorders, will be and randomized into 3 groups: (1) standard care alone without case management, (2) two-year case management, (3) four-year case management. All groups will receive usual standard care treatment. This four-year follow-up study will assess symptoms, functioning, quality of life as well as health economics data.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

26 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, China

About this study

Psychotic disorder is a debilitating illness which imposes substantial impact to the patients, their families, and the society. The provision of early intervention provides a window of opportunity to minimize the social and economic burden incurred by the illness.

Many previous studies of effectiveness of early intervention used the historical control approach and are subjected to cohort effects. For example, change of medication pattern over time could potentially lead to differences in outcome. In addition, few studies provide longer-term outcome data of treatment program beyond two years. The optimal length of intervention has not been determined, and many programmes used 12-24 month intervention mainly based on resources available. It is also important to ask whether favorable effects of early intervention could be sustained over time. Further analyses will be done to assess whether EI effects are more pronounced in particular subgroups including DUP, age, sex and diagnosis.

The proposed study aims to address these issues by using a randomized controlled design to investigate the longer-term (4 year) outcome of patients with first episode psychosis. The study randomizes 360 patients with first episode psychotic disorders into 3 groups: (1) standard care (outpatient based care with inpatient and community care as required); (2) standard care with 2 years of add-on stage specific case-management (individualized care delivered by designated case managers according to specific protocol); and (3) standard care with 4 years of add-on stage specific case management.

The study hypothesis are: (1) both 2 years and 4 years of case management produce better outcomes than standard care alone; (2) 4 years of case management produces better outcome than 2 years of case management.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform psychosis, brief psychosis, psychosis nos or delusional disorder
  • Cantonese-speaking Chinese
  • Ability to understand the nature of the study and sign informed consent
  • Capacity to participate in cognitive testing

Exclusion criteria

  • Organic Brain disorder
  • Known history of intellectual disability

Treatment and study plan

stage-specific case-management

Behavioral

Stage-specific case-management for psychosis by designated key-workers according to specified protocol

Primary outcomes

  1. Functioning (social and occupational)

    Time frame: baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychotic symptoms

    Time frame: baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

    Psychotic symptoms will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

  2. Psychotic symptoms

    Time frame: baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

    Psychotic symptoms will be assessed using Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)

  3. Psychotic symptoms

    Time frame: baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

    Psychotic symptoms will be assessed using Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).

  4. Depressive symptoms

    Time frame: baseline, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS).

  5. Neurocognitive functioning

    Time frame: baseline, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

    A battery of neurocognitive tests will be conducted, including Handedness, Trail Making, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Semantic Verbal Fluency, Logical Verbal Memory, Visual Patterns Test, Letter Number Span, Monotone Counting, and Soft Neurological Signs.

  6. Health economics

    Time frame: baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, 48-month

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Other

Collaborators

  • Castle Peak Hospital
  • Kowloon Hospital, Hong Kong
  • Kwai Chung Hospital
  • North District Hospital, Hong Kong
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
  • Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
  • Shatin Hospital
  • Tai Po Hospital
  • United Christian Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Outcome of Stage-specific Early Intervention for Psychosis in Hong Kong: A Randomized Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jun 12, 2009
Registry last updated
Nov 13, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.