NCT Number: NCT02864732
Stabilization Exercises Alone vs Stabilization Exercises Plus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People With Chronic Low Back Pain
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the lumbar spine, to report how tolerable the intervention is, and whether the electrical stimulation improve pain, function and muscle strength.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–60 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Between 18 years of age and 60.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of less than 34.
- Low Back Pain duration of 3 months or greater (chronic).
- Minimum pain level on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is 3 or greater.
- Minimum score of Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) is 20 or greater.
- Understands English
Exclusion criteria
- Positive nerve root tension signs
- Progressive neurological deficit
- Positive Babinski sign.
- Sensory loss that is not in correspondence with dermatomal distribution or peripheral nerves.
- History of spinal surgery
- History of inflammatory joint disease
- Contraindications to physical exercise including history of cardiac disease or being told by a physician not to engage in physical exercise.
- Contraindications to NMES including cardiac pacemaker or skin allergy to adhesives
- History of metastatic cancer in previous 5 years or present treatment for cancer
- Women who indicate that they are pregnant or plan to become pregnant
Treatment and study plan
Electrical Stimulation
DeviceOther names: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES)
Primary outcomes
-
Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES)
Time frame: Participants were followed from baseline to 6 weeks
NMES tolerability was performed by asking each subject in the stab + NMES group to describe their subjective perception of both the intensity and discomfort of the NMES current using the descriptors listed in a table. The descriptors represent two distinct domains of adjectives: the sensory aspect of the perceived intensity of stimulation and the affective aspect of the perceived discomfort. Each aspect has 15 adjectives. Each subject was asked to describe the current using the descriptors listed for each aspect at baseline and at 6 weeks.
To analyze the the subjects description of the current, the 15 descriptors of each aspect were divided into 3 zones (high, medium, low). The top 5 descriptors in each aspect were considered high, the middle 5 descriptors were considered medium, and the bottom descriptors were considered low.
Descriptive statistics were used to compare the subjects description of each aspect at baseline and at 6 weeks follow-up.
-
Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) to 10 weeks (follow up).
The MODQ is a self-reported measure of disability consisting of 10 domains of functional activities related to low back pain. The domains include pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, standing, sitting, traveling, social life, employment/homemaking, and sleeping. Each domain is rated from 0 - 5. The total of all the domains range from 0 - 50. The scores can be multiplied by 2 to get a percentage of functional disability. The higher the percentage the higher the disability.
Secondary outcomes
-
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) to 10 weeks (follow-up)
The NPRS measures pain intensity on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The higher the score the worst the pain intensity
-
Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment)
The Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ) measure avoidant behavior to physical activity or work due to fear of pain. The has two sub scales: physical activity and work. This FABQ consists of 16 items; 5 items for the physical activity sub scale and 11 items for the work subscale. Each item is scored from 0-6. Higher scores on the FABQ are indicative of greater fear and avoidance beliefs. The total score on the FABQ is 66, however, this score is considered separately. The FABQ-physical activity sub scale ranges from 0 - 24 points and the FABQ-work activity ranges from 0 - 42 points.
-
Paraspinal Muscle Strength
Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks (post-treatment)
The paraspinal muscle strength was assessed using the Biodex 3 Pro dynamometer (20 Ramsey Rd, Shirley, NY 11967). Active extension of the trunk was performed with the subject in a semi-standing position; the subject's hips were flexed at 60 degrees with the feet resting on an adjustable footrest. The thighs were secured to the seat with two Velcro straps. The scapulae rested against a roll that is attached to the chair arms. The trunk was secured with two Velcro straps that crossed the front trunk forming the shape of an X. The subject was asked to extend the trunk by exerting maximal isometric contraction for 5 seconds against the scapular roll. The average of three 5-second trials was recorded. All subjects received the same verbal instruction: "Push your trunk against the scapular roll as strong as you can". The higher the score the stronger the muscles. The range starts from 0 without a limit to the amount of force that could be exerted.
-
Patient Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: only post-treatment at 6 weeks
Satisfaction level with the interventions. Subjects were asked rate their satisfaction with the treatment by choosing one of the following statements:
Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Unsatisfied Very unsatisfied
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Other
Collaborators
- King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam
- Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission
Registry information
Official study title
A Comparison Between Stabilization Exercises and Stabilization Exercises Supplemented With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation: A Feasibility Study
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Aug 12, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Aug 22, 2023
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Effect of Vibration Massager Therapy on Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT06840795
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsComparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Squat Exercises in Healthy Individuals
NCT06843785
Back Pain, Balance; Distorted
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsHamstring Stretching Effective on Nonspecific Low Back Pain
NCT06837753
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsEffect of Kinesio Taping Application in Addition to Pilates Exercises on Core Muscle Thickness, Cognition and Mental Fatigue in Individuals With Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT06787079
Back Pain, Behavior
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details