Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03244163

Spyglass DS Peroral Cholangioscope Guided LL or EHL Versus BML for Endoscopic Removal of Complicated Bile Duct Stones

This study aims to compare the overall rate of endoscopic clearance of complicated bile duct stones by Spyglass DS peroral cholangioscopy guided holmium:YAG laser/electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus conventional BML.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Endoscopy Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, NT

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

John C Wong, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(852)35052931

About this study

Currently, complicated bile duct stones are removed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by conventional mechanical lithotripsy, which means using a metal wire basket to capture the stone and crush it to make it easier to remove. This is successful in approximately 70% of patients, with the success rate inversely correlated to the size of the stone. Unsuccessful stone removal would require additional endoscopic, percutaneous or surgical interventions. Spyglass DS peroral cholangioscope-guided holmium:YAG laser/electrohydraulic lithotripsy is a recent alternate method for managing complicated bile duct stones. Also performed during ERCP, a thin flexible camera (called Spyglass DS peroral cholangioscope) is inserted into the bile duct to visualize the stone which can then be targeted by a laser beam for fragmentation (also known as laser lithotripsy). The smaller pieces are then removed. Direct comparisons of these procedures' efficacy however have not been performed.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Spyglass DS peroral cholangioscope-guided holmium:YAG laser/electrohydraulic lithotripsy (the laser arm) versus conventional basket mechanical lithotripsy alone (the conventional arm) for fragmentation and clearance of complicated bile duct stones.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with complicated biliary stones
  • Patients older than 18 years old
  • Patients where informed consent can be obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who cannot give informed consent
  • Patients under 18 years old
  • Pregnant or lactating patients
  • Patient with altered gastrointestinal/biliary anatomy
  • Patients with distal CBD malignant stricture from intrinsic or extrinsic causes
  • Patients with ongoing cholangitis or biliary pancreatitis
  • Patient with refractory bleeding tendencies (Platelet count <50,000/mm3 or International Normalized Ratio >1.5 despite correction with platelet or fresh frozen plasma transfusions)
  • Patients with intrahepatic segmental stones
  • Patients with contraindications to endoscopy due to comorbidities

Treatment and study plan

Spyglass DS cholangioscope

Device

The 1.8Fr holmium:YAG laser fiber (Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) will be inserted into the cholangioscope's working channel for lithotripsy under direct visualization. An EHL probe may alternatively be used depending on availability. Lithotripsy is applied until fragments of the targeted stone are no longer lumen filling, and can be dispersed easily with fluid irrigation. Fragmented stones are then removed by a combination of conventional techniques. To confirm stone clearance, the Spyglass DS cholangioscope will be re-introduced, and the bile duct will be examined for residual stones from the confluence of the right and left intrahepatic ducts to the papillary opening

BML

Device

Biliary sphincterotomy with/without EPBD to the size of the lower bile duct with a limit of 15mm will be performed. Stones are removed by a combination of conventional BML, extraction balloon and/or baskets, without laser lithotripsy. An occlusion cholangiogram is performed to confirm stone clearance. In cases where stone clearance is incomplete, a plastic biliary stent bridging the stone will be inserted for temporary drainage until definitive management, usually within one month.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall rate of endoscopic bile duct stone clearance

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Overall rate of endoscopic bile duct stone clearance

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical feasibility

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Technical feasibility defined as successful introduction of cholangioscope into the CBD, visualisation and laser targeting of stone

  2. Incidence of adverse events

    Time frame: 30 days

    Incidence of adverse events

  3. Need for and number of additional procedures for stone clearance

    Time frame: 6 months

    Need for and number of additional procedures for stone clearance

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

John C Wong, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(852)35052931

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Controlled Trial of Spyglass DS Peroral Cholangioscope Guided Laser Lithotripsy or Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Versus Conventional Basket Mechanical Lithotripsy for Endoscopic Removal of Complicated Bile Duct Stones

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 9, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.