Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03162978

Sprint to Fitness: Effect of Outcome Expectations on Responses to Interval Exercise Training

The purpose of this study is to research the effects of exercising at high intensities for short periods of time on exercise tolerance and motivation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center

Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58203, United States

About this study

The proposed research will investigate whether adding a treatment component that focuses on positive outcome expectations of a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention produces greater improvements in psychological and physiological study outcomes. This project will yield empirical evidence that will inform how to help Americans meet physical activity guidelines; how to develop exercise programs that are more likely to promote exercise as a habit; and maintenance of health and a healthy body weight.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Body Mass Index of 25-35 kg/m2
  • Sedentary (not regularly engaging in exercise more than once per week)
  • Weight stable (have not lost or gained over 10 pounds of body weight in the past 3 months)

Exclusion criteria

  • Taking any medications that affect energy expenditure or treat high blood pressure
  • Tobacco use
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant in the next 3 months
  • Have any medical conditions that prevent subject from safely exercising (e.g., orthopedic injuries, cardiovascular, liver, endocrine, or pulmonary diseases)
  • Resting systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg
  • Resting diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg
  • Non-fasting plasma glucose of ≥ 200 mg/dl

Treatment and study plan

HIIT + POE

Other

Subjects will participate in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with an additional treatment component to increase positive outcome expectations (POE) of exercise.

HIIT only

Other

Subjects will participate in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) only.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in relative reinforcing value (RRV) of physical activity

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    RRV of physical activity will be assessed by evaluating the number of responses (mouse button presses) a subject is willing to complete to gain access to physical activity or a sedentary alternative.

  2. Changes in preference for intense physical activity and tolerance for exercise discomfort

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in preference for intense physical activity and tolerance for exercise discomfort will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire (PRETIE-Q). The PRETIE-Q measures preference for high intensity vs. low intensity exercise and ability to persist or tolerate the discomfort associationed with intense exercise. The PRETIE-Q consists of two subscales: Preference for Exercise Intensity and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity. Each subscale has 8 items rated on a 5 point response scale (range 8 - 40). Higher scores indicate greater preference for intense exercise and/or greater tolerance for exercise discomfort. Total scale scores are not used. Scale averages will be used.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in minutes of physical activity, as assessed by activity tracker

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Minutes of physical activity will be assessed by having participants wear an Actigraph accelerometer for 7 days (minimum 10 hours per day) on the right hip.

  2. Changes in quadriceps and hamstring (thigh muscle) strength assessed separately on each leg

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    After range of motion is determined, participants will engage in a series of extensions and flexions in which maximum velocity is set at 60°, 180°, and 300°.s±1 to determine each leg's peak torque as assessed by isokinetic dynamometer testing (Biodex System 4 Pro).

  3. Changes in aerobic fitness, as assessed using the Standardized Exponential Exercise Protocol (STEEP)

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    After a brief warm-up, participants will pedal on an ergometer 75-85 revolutions per minute (RPMs) at low resistance of approximately 2 metabolic equivalent of task (METs). The resistance will increase by 15% per minute until respiratory exchange ratio (RER) exceeds 1.0, maximum oxygen consumption (V02 max) is reached, or participant can no longer maintain pedaling speed.

  4. Changes in anaerobic power, as during a Wingate anaerobic power exercise test

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Following a brief warm-up, participants will be instructed to pedal on an ergometer as hard and as fast as they can for 30 seconds at a resistance of 1 watt·kilogram-1, followed by a cool-down period. Changes in anaerobic power, will be as assessed by as changes in power outputs in watts (rpm·braking force).

  5. Changes in fat mass as assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Participants will be instructed to lie supine with hands by their sides on a GE Lunar iDXA machine for a full-body x-ray scan which will measure grams and percentage changed in fat mass.

  6. Changes in fat-free lean mass as assessed by DXA scans

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Participants will be instructed to lie supine with hands by their sides on a GE Lunar iDXA machine for a full-body x-ray scan which will measure grams and percentage changed in fat-free lean mass.

  7. Changes in tolerance for physical pain and discomfort

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in preference for tolerance for physical pain and discomfort will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Discomfort Intolerance Scale (DIS). This scale measures individual differences in ability to tolerate uncomfortable sensations. There are 7 items total. Although there are two subscales (measure ability to tolerate discomfort / pain and avoidance of physical discomfort) only total scores will be used. There are 7 items total. Items are scored 0 - 6 (total range 0 - 42), with higher scores indicating greater ability to tolerate physical discomfort. Average score on the total scale will be used.

  8. Changes in perceived support for physical activity from friends and family members

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes perceived support for physical activity from friends and family members will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Social Support and Exercise Survey. This questionnaire measures 13 items are scored on a scale of 1 - 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived support. Total scores will be used, with ranges from 13 - 65. Higher scores indicate greater perceived support. Average score for the total scale will be used. Items may be answered twice, once for family members and once for friends.

  9. Changes in perceptions of how much exercise satisfies autonomy, relatedness, and competence needs

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in perceptions of how much exercise satisfies autonomy, relatedness, and competence needs will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale. This scale measures how much the psychological needs of autonomy, relatedness, and competence are satisfied during exercise. There are three subscales: autonomy, relatedness, and competence. Each subscale has 6 items rated on a 6-point scale. Higher scores indicate greater amounts of the construct. Total subscale scores may range from 6 to 36. Subscale averages will be used in analyses.

  10. Changes in intrinsic, external, interrogated, identified, introjected and amotivation for physical activity

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in intrinsic, external, interrogated, identified, introjected and amotivation for physical activity will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise, 3rd Edition (BREQ-3).This scale measures how much exercise behavior is driven by intrinsic motivation, external motivation, interrogated motivation, identified motivation, introjected motivation, and amotivation (lack of motivation). There are 6 subscales with 4 items each: intrinsic, external, interrogated, identified, introjected, and amotivation. Items are measured on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicated greater amounts of the construct. Subscale scores may range from 4 to 20. Average subscale scores will be used in analyses.

  11. Changes in how enjoyable physical activity is perceived to be

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in how enjoyable physical activity is perceived to be will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Physical Activity Enjoyment scale (PACES). This scale measures how enjoyable or unenjoyable physical activity is perceived to be. The measure consists of 18 questions and no subscales. Each question is measured on a 7-point scale, where higher scores indicate greater enjoyment. Total scores may range from 18 to 126. Average score will be used.

  12. Changes in perceived effort expended during exercise

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in perceived effort expended during exercise will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale. This scale measures perceived physical exertion during exercise. There is only 1 item and no subscales. Scores may range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater perceived exertion. The total score will be used in analyses.

  13. Changes in perceived pain/discomfort during exercise

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in perceived pain/discomfort during exercise will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Numeric Ratings Pain Scale. This single item scale measures muscle pain/discomfort associated with physical activity. There are no subscales. Scores may range from 0 to 11, with higher scores indicating greater pain/discomfort. The total score will be used in analyses.

  14. Changes in perceived ability to continue exercise long-term

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in perceived ability to continue exercise long-term will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale (BARSE). This scale measures perceived ability to continue meeting exercise guidelines over the next 1 to 8 weeks. There are no subscales. 8 items are measured on an 11-point scale where higher scores indicate greater certainty in ability to complete exercise. Average score will be used in analyses.

  15. Changes in perceived ability to stick to an exercise routine

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10

    Changes in perceived ability to stick to an exercise routine will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Exercise Confidence Survey. This scale measures perceived confidence in ability to make time for exercise and persist in an exercise routine. There are 2 subscales: sticking to it (8 items) and making time for exercise (4 items). Items are measured on a 5-point scale where higher scores indicate greater confidence. Total scores may range from 8-40 (sticking to it) or 4-20 (making time). Average subscale scores will be used in analyses.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Outcome Expectations on Psychological and Physiological Responses to Interval Exercise Training

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
May 22, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.