Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03709095

Sprint Interval Training During Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury

Immediately following a spinal cord injury (SCI), patients are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation where they undergo physical reconditioning in preparation for a return to home setting. The current standard of practice for aerobic training is performing arm-ergometry for 25 mins at a frequency of three times per week. Given the move towards shortened length of stay during inpatient rehabilitation, performing MICT can consume a considerable amount of therapy time. Sprint interval training (SIT) has been shown to elicit similar improvements in physical capacity, despite a reduced time commitment to MICT. However, there are no controlled trials comparing the effects of SIT to MICT in individuals with SCI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a five-week, thrice weekly 10 min SIT program and compare outcome measures to a traditional 25 minute MICT program on the arm-ergometer in individuals with SCI undergoing inpatient clinical rehabilitation. It was hypothesized that five weeks of SIT and MICT would induce similar changes in maximal and sub-maximal exercise performance, self-efficacy for exercise, and exercise enjoyment, despite large differences in training volume and time commitment. It was also hypothesized that SIT would be well tolerated and elicit higher levels of cardiovascular strain than MICT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with sub-acute spinal cord injury (time since injury: 14 - 182 days)
  • Undergoing inpatient rehabilitation
  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Injury level at the second cervical vertebrae (C2) or below

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to perform arm-ergometry training

Treatment and study plan

Sprint Interval Training

Other

Participants utilized the arm ergometer for improving aerobic exercise capacity

Moderate Intensity Continuous Training

Other

Participants utilized the arm ergometer for improving aerobic exercise capacity

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in peak power output

    Time frame: Change in peak power output from baseline to 5 weeks

    maximum amount of power produced during a graded exercise test on the arm-ergometer

  2. Change in sub-maximal arm-ergometry

    Time frame: Change in sub-maximal arm-ergometry from baseline to 5 weeks

    Participants performed three 5-minute steady state workloads on the arm-ergometer at power outputs corresponding to RPE's of 8, 10 and 12. Participants were given a minimum of 2 minutes, and a maximum of 5 minutes of rest in between each workload.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cardiovascular Responses

    Time frame: Throughout each week of training (Week 1,Week 2, Week 3, Week4, Week 5)

    Monitored heart rate throughout each training session

  2. Perceptual Responses

    Time frame: Throughout each week of training (Week 1,Week 2, Week 3, Week4, Week 5)

    Monitored ratings of perceived exertion throughout each training session

  3. Change in self-efficacy for exercise

    Time frame: Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 5 weeks

    Using a self-reported questionnaire, participants rated how confident they are with regards to performing and carrying out regular physical activities and exercises.

  4. Exercise Satisfaction

    Time frame: Measured only at the end of the intervention (5 weeks)

    Participants completed the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) in order to asses the level of enjoyment with the training intervention they received.

  5. Pain perceptions

    Time frame: Measured only at the end of the intervention (5 weeks)

    Through a questionnaire, participants rated how much shoulder pain, bodily pain, and physical discomfort they typically experience throughout the day and how much pain they experienced with the intervention they were allocated to.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McMaster University

Other

Collaborators

  • Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Registry information

Acronym: SprintSCI

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Oct 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 17, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.