Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04108000

SPIRIT for Persons With Dementia and Complex Multimorbidity

In this study, 30 patient and caregiver dyads will be randomized to receive the SPIRIT-dementia intervention or usual care. Participants will be follow-up with 2-3 days after the intervention to evaluate the impact of SPIRIT on preparedness outcomes. Additional follow up with caregivers will occur 6 months later.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Cognitive impairment or dementia, usually vascular dementia or Alzheimer's, co-occur in approximately 38% of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). When dementia is superimposed on ESRD, the risk for poor outcomes, including disability, hospitalization and death, sharply increases. Similarly, initiating dialysis in older adults with multiple comorbidities, including dementia, does not offer survival benefit. However, advance care planning (ACP) discussions with dialysis patients rarely occur. The reality of ESRD plus dementia is that most of these patients are likely to die or progress to advanced dementia without ever engaging in ACP discussions before the cognitive window of opportunity closes. Moreover, persons with dementia (regardless of their cognitive impairment level) are routinely excluded from clinical trials of ACP, largely because investigators assume that these people do not have the cognitive capability to appreciate the complexity of ACP. In an on-going study ("SPIRIT in Dementia") the researchers carefully adapted SPIRIT for persons with mild to moderate dementia (mostly due to Alzheimer's) and their surrogates. In a sample of 23 dementia patients without complex multimorbidity and their surrogates, the researchers were able to conclude that meaningful ACP conversations were possible even for individuals with moderate dementia. Based on these findings, this supplement study will leverage the infrastructure of the parent SPIRIT in ESRD trial to pilot test the adapted SPIRIT intervention for patients with ESRD plus dementia as a model for determining whether patients with dementia superimposed on complex multimorbidity can fully participate in ACP discussion.

This purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial with 30 patient and caregiver dyads is to:

  • estimate the effects of the SPIRIT-dementia intervention on: (a) preparedness outcomes for end-of-life decision making (defined as dyad congruence on goals of care, patient decisional conflict, and surrogate decision-making confidence) 2-3 days post-intervention, and (b) care decisions (withdrawal from dialysis, Do-Not-Resuscitate order, hospice enrollment) assessed at 6 months post-intervention, or the patient's death, whichever occurs first,
  • estimate the effects of the SPIRIT-dementia intervention on surrogates' post-bereavement distress (anxiety and depression symptoms) at 1 month after the patient's death, and
  • explore the relationships among patients' cognitive status, decision-making capacity and their ability to express end-of-life wishes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • receiving in-center hemodialysis
  • diagnosed with dementia or having mild to moderate cognitive impairment based on a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score 13-25 or a Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) score < 27 (high school education) or < 25 (less than high school education)
  • able to understand and speak English
  • a University of California San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) score of 11 or higher

Exclusion criteria

  • lack of an available surrogate
  • uncompensated hearing deficits
  • already enrolled in hospice

Surrogate Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • be chosen by the patient
  • able to understand and speak English

Treatment and study plan

SPIRIT-Dementia

Behavioral

The interventionist will begin the SPIRIT-dementia session by assessing the patient's and surrogate's cognitive, emotional, and spiritual/religious representations of the patient's illness, prognosis, and end-of-life care. Individualized information will be provided about the effectiveness of life-sustaining treatment for people with end-organ failure, and the patient will examine their values about life-sustaining treatment at the end of life. The interventionist will help the surrogate prepare for end-of-life decision-making and for the emotional burden of decision-making. A Goals-of-Care document will be completed at the end of the session. The delivery of SPIRIT-dementia incorporates "enhanced consent techniques," such as reducing information load by proceeding in manageable segments, offering repetition of material, opportunity for rehearsal, and using targeted questioning to verify adequate comprehension prior to eliciting preferences for goals of care.

Usual Care

Behavioral

As required by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) written information on advance directives is provided to a patient on the first day of dialysis, and a social worker reviews this information with patients and encourages them to complete an advance directive.

Primary outcomes

  1. Dyad Congruence

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 Days Post-intervention

    Dyad congruence will be assessed using the Goals-of-Care Tool which includes two scenarios describing medical conditions commonly occurring in ESRD patients. Possible responses to the scenarios are: "The goals of care should focus on delaying my death, and thus I want to continue life-sustaining treatment", "The goals of care should focus on my comfort and peace, and thus I do not want life-sustaining treatment, including dialysis", and "I am not sure". Patients and surrogates complete this tool independently and their responses are then compared to determine dyad congruence.

  2. Patient's Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 Days Post-intervention

    Patient decisional conflict will be measured using the 13-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a validated measure in the context of end-of-life decision making. Participants indicate their level of agreement with statements about their plans for their future medical care by selecting (1) Strongly Agree, (2) Agree, (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree, (4) Disagree, or (5) Strongly Disagree. The total score ranges from 13 - 65 with higher scores indicating greater difficulty in weighing benefits and burdens of life-sustaining treatments and decision making.

  3. Surrogate's Decision Making Confidence (DMC) Scale Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 Days Post-intervention

    Surrogate decision-making confidence will be measured using the 5-item Decision Making Confidence (DMC) scale. Surrogates indicate how confident they are about making medical decisions if the patient becomes unable to make their own decisions by their level of agreement with statements along a scale of (0) "Not confident at all" to (5) "Very confident". Total scores range from 0 - 20, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Care Decisions (Withdrawal From Dialysis, DNR, Hospice Enrollment)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-intervention

    The proportion of decisions (participants who withdrew from dialysis, Do not resuscitate (DNR), or chose hospice enrollment) will be compared between study arms.

  2. Surrogate's Anxiety-Score Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month after the Patient's Death

    Surrogate post-bereavement anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Surrogates indicate their level of agreement with statements by selecting responses rated from 0 (the problem in the statement is not an issue) to 3 (the problem in the statement is a very big issue). The separate anxiety and depression subscale scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. A score of 0-7 indicates "normal", 8-10 indicates "borderline abnormal", and 11-21 indicates "abnormal" levels of anxiety or depression.

  3. Surrogate's Depression-Score by Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month after the Patient's Death

    Surrogate post-bereavement anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Surrogates indicate their level of agreement with statements by selecting responses rated from 0 (the problem in the statement is not an issue) to 3 (the problem in the statement is a very big issue). The separate anxiety and depression subscale scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. A score of 0-7 indicates "normal", 8-10 indicates "borderline abnormal", and 11-21 indicates "abnormal" levels of anxiety or depression.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Emory University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 27, 2019
Registry last updated
May 24, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.