Spinal anesthesia
ProcedureSpinal anesthesia was used in patients who underwent LC
NCT Number: NCT02956252
The aim of this study is to compare early postoperative outcomes of unselected consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under spinal versus general anesthesia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard surgical treatment of symptomatic cholecystectomy which traditionally performed under general anesthesia. Laparoscopy has provided many advantages over open surgery for the patients; however, general anesthesia adversely affects patients' early postoperative quality of life (POQoL).
Spinal anesthesia which is a less invasive technique compared to general anesthesia has many advantages regarding the POQoL such as no need to wait for recovery from anesthesia, less nausea and vomiting, less or no pain at the end of surgery, no discomfort associated with intubation, early ambulation, fully awaken and oriented patient in the bed, and less anxious relatives.
LC has been shown to be feasible under spinal anesthesia if performed with proper technique. There are many reports demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of LC under spinal anesthesia in selected patients. However, patients with complicated gallstone disease such as acute, gangrenous or subacute cholecystitis have been considered as unfit cases for LC under spinal anesthesia because of technical difficulties. On the other hand, spinal anesthesia has also been regarded as inappropriate for patients complying with American society for anesthesiology (ASA) III and IV due to the uncontrolled anesthesia risks.
The aim of this study is to compare early postoperative outcomes of unselected consecutive patients underwent LC under spinal versus general anesthesia. If proportion of general anesthesia (PGA) / proportion of spinal anesthesia (PSA) denotes the proportion rate of outcomes in the general anesthesia group (GaG) / spinal anesthesia group (SaG), then two-sided test problem is assessed as follow:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Spinal anesthesia was used in patients who underwent LC
General anesthesia was used in patients who underwent LC
Time frame: from baseline to postoperative 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours
Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used
Time frame: From postoperative 1 week to 1 month
Numerical rating scale was used
Time frame: within the postoperative 1 month
All types of complications were assessed
Time frame: within the postoperative 1 month
all causes of mortality were recorded
Time frame: change from baseline to postoperative 1 week and 1 month
A standard form was used under the supervision of experienced independent personal
Time frame: at postoperative 1 month
a verbal or visual scale was used
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
Other
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Cohort Study With Unselected Consecutive Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07363668
Biliary Tract Diseases, Cholecystitis
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00370344
Biliary Tract Diseases, Calculi
Lycksele, Västerbotten County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07222527
Biliary Colic, Biliary Tract Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06005701
Behavior, Bile Duct Diseases
Buraidah, Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial Details