Spinal Cord Stimulation
DeviceUtilization of BURSTDR stimulation
Other names: Proclaim XR IPG
NCT Number: NCT04479787
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BurstDR dorsal column stimulation, compared with conventional medical management, in improving pain and back-related physical function in subjects suffering with chronic, refractory axial low back pain with a neuropathic component, who have not had lumbar spine surgery and for whom surgery is not an option.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Barrow Brain & Spine, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
A prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical study with an optional crossover component. The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of BurstDR SCS in the treatment of chronic axial low back pain with a neuropathic component, compared to conventional medical management (CMM).
Subjects will be followed in-clinic at 1,3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months and via phone call or optional clinic visit at 15- and 21-months. The primary endpoint will be assessed at the 6-month follow-up visit. Upon completion of the 6-month follow-up visit, subjects who are dissatisfied with therapy and receiving inadequate improvement with their treatment assignment will be allowed to cross-over to the other treatment arm, if desired.
The study will enroll up to 270 patients at up to 30 sites. Subjects will be randomized in a 3:2 fashion to yield approximately 200 evaluable subjects for the primary endpoint analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Utilization of BURSTDR stimulation
Other names: Proclaim XR IPG
Assessing type of CMM, location and frequency.
Other names: Physical Therapy, Medications, Injections, Acupuncture, Massage Therapy, Etc.
Time frame: 6 Months
Improvement in pain, defined as percentage of patients who report a ≥ 50% decrease on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
Time frame: 6 Months
Composite Responder rate describes percentage of patients who responded on NRS OR ODI improvements (percentage of patients who report at least ≥13 change on ODI from baseline OR a ≥ 50% decrease in NRS from baseline).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a verbal or written determination of a pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents no pain and 10 represents excruciating pain (the worst pain imaginable). Lower scores indicate pain reduction. The data is expressed as relative change (%).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
The Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. An interpretation of 0% to 20% means minimal disability;21% to 40% means moderate disability; 41% to 60% means severe disability; 61% to 80% means crippled; and 81%-100% means bed-bound patients. Lower scores indicate less disability.
Time frame: 6 Months
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale questionnaire is a three part question that measures three pain domains:
Time frame: 6 Months
PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The percentage of patients who reported "very much improved," or "much improved," are presented.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain interference domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome). Pain Interferences: Normal: <55; Mild: 55 - 60; Moderate: 60 -70; and Severe: >70.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months
The PROMIS-29 physical function sub-scale includes 4 questions. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the physical function domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome). Physical function- Normal: >45; Mild: 40 - 45; Moderate: 30 - 40; and Severe: >30.
Abbott Medical Devices
Industry
Dorsal Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Medical Management for the Treatment of Low Back Pain (DISTINCT)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05754190
Acute Pain, Arthritis
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04494698
Acute Low-back Pain, Agnosia
Landover, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07190807
Back Pain, Chronic Leg Pain
Greenwood, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06931158
Chronic Low-back Pain, Chronic Pain
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial Details