Sperm, Exposure and Endocrine Disruptors

The SEED study hypothesizes that our report-back and intervention program will increase environmental health literacy and EDC-reduction behavior, reduce urinary EDCs, and improve semen quality in a sample of US men with low semen quality. And the intervention program will have a larger effect than report-back only. The study will consist of three Aims: 1) Measure male participants' urinary levels of EDCs and semen quality before and after report-back and EDC reduction intervention and assess change. 60 men, with previously established low semen quality, will be recruited from Fellow Health customers (a direct-to-consumer semen testing company). All participants' EDC exposures will be assessed via the MM test kit and receive personalized report-back. Subsequently, in a randomized-controlled trial, 30 participants (i.e. the intervention group) will engage in an 8-session online EDC environmental health literacy curriculum, as well as an online forum and coaching sessions, aimed to increase environmental health literacy and exposure reduction behavior. Thirty participants (i.e. the control group) will receive the report-back only. After completion of the curriculum, participants will retest urinary EDCs. Semen quality at these two time points will also be collected. Differences between the intervention and control groups will be assessed. 2) Assess the extent to which MM's program (testing, curriculum, and report-back) alters participant environmental health literacy, readiness to change, and product/lifestyle choices. Measures of environmental health literacy, willingness/readiness to reduce exposure, exposure reduction behavior, and sources of exposure will be assessed pre- and post-testing/intervention via previously validated surveys, including environmental health literacy and readiness to change (i.e. ready to reduce exposure), and lifestyle audits (including product use, diet, and lifestyle factors). Differences between the intervention and control groups will be assessed. 3) Test the feasibility and acceptability of MM's program to male participants. The usability, feasibility, and overall acceptability of the MM intervention program (i.e. testing, report-back, curriculum, coaching sessions) will be assessed in participants via the System Usability Score and other participant satisfaction questions. Further, focus groups and key informant interviews will be conducted in a subset of participants following the study to gather both qualitative and quantitative information to assess and improve the MM program.

Inclusion criteria

• Men,
• Reproductive Age,
• Good Health,
• Non-Smoker
• English-Speaking
• No Occupational/Medical Risks
• not using steroids or TRT/hormone replacement supplements
• low sperm count=total motile count below 20 million/ml
• tested by Fellow in the last 3 months

Exclusion criteria

• Women
• Non-Reproductive Age
• Poor Health
• Smoker
• Non-English Speaking
• Occupational/Medical Risks
• using steroids or TRT/hormone replacement supplements
• total motile count over 20 mil/ml, tested by Fellow over 3 months ago