Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07481500

Speculum-Free Intravitreal Injection Using Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction: A Randomized Trial of Pain, Procedure Time, Patient Satisfaction, and Safety

This randomized controlled trial compares two techniques for eyelid retraction during intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-VEGF agents: the standard wire eyelid speculum (Group A) versus cotton-tipped applicator retraction (Group B) in patients with neovascular AMD, diabetic macular edema, or retinal vein occlusion.

The study evaluates four outcomes: (1) patient pain perception measured by a 10-cm visual analogue scale immediately after injection; (2) procedure duration from retraction device placement to removal; (3) patient satisfaction assessed by a 5-item Likert scale; and (4) safety including rates of subconjunctival hemorrhage, corneal abrasion, endophthalmitis, and intraocular pressure elevation.

A novel syringe cap technique using the Terumo 31G insulin syringe plastic cap as an injection-site marker (3.5 mm for pseudophakic eyes, 5.0 mm for phakic eyes from the limbus) is employed in both groups, replacing the traditional caliper.

Randomization is stratified by diagnosis and prior injection history using permuted block randomization (block sizes 4 and 6). The target sample size is 120 patients (60 per group) at Walailak University Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Background:

Intravitreal injection is one of the most frequently performed ophthalmic procedures worldwide. Eyelid specula are standard for keeping the eye open during injection but may cause discomfort, corneal exposure, and patient anxiety. Cotton-tipped applicator retraction is an alternative technique that may reduce pain and improve patient experience, but comparative randomized data on procedure time, satisfaction, and safety are lacking.

Study Design:

Single-center, prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to speculum (Group A) or cotton-tipped applicator retraction (Group B). Stratified permuted block randomization is performed using Study Randomizer software with six strata: diagnosis (nAMD / DME / RVO) × prior injection history (injection-naïve / previously injected).

Interventions:

All patients receive standard preparation: topical tetracaine 0.5% (two instillations), 5% povidone-iodine ophthalmic drops (≥5 min contact), and 10% povidone-iodine periocular skin preparation. Anti-VEGF agents used are bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab (per clinical indication), injected via Terumo 31G insulin syringe at the superotemporal quadrant. Post-injection levofloxacin 0.5% drops are instilled immediately after needle withdrawal.

Outcome Measures:

Primary: Pain VAS (0-10 cm) immediately post-procedure; procedure duration (seconds) from retraction device placement to removal. Secondary: Patient satisfaction (5-item Likert scale, total 5-25); safety outcomes (subconjunctival hemorrhage, corneal abrasion, endophthalmitis, IOP elevation) at Day 0, Day 1 (telephone), and Week 4.

Blinding:

Patients cannot be blinded to retraction method. Pain VAS is assessed by an independent assessor blinded to group assignment. Procedure timing is recorded by a circulating nurse blinded to the randomization list.

Sample Size:

Based on Chen et al. (2025), assuming pooled SD of 1.71 for pain VAS (Cohen's d = 0.57), with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.025, power 80%), 52 patients per group are required for pain and 46 for procedure duration. With 15% dropout allowance, the final target is 60 patients per group (120 total).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO)
  • Scheduled for intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab)
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Active ocular infection or inflammation
  • Known allergy to povidone-iodine, tetracaine, or levofloxacin
  • Inability to cooperate with the injection procedure
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial
  • Anatomical eyelid abnormality precluding use of either retraction technique

Treatment and study plan

Eyelid Speculum Retraction

Procedure

A wire eyelid speculum is inserted to retract the eyelids prior to intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab) using a Terumo 31G insulin syringe at the superotemporal quadrant. The speculum is removed immediately after needle withdrawal.

Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction

Procedure

Two sterile cotton-tipped applicators are used to retract the eyelids (speculum-free) prior to intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab) using a Terumo 31G insulin syringe at the superotemporal quadrant. Applicators are removed immediately after needle withdrawal.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Perception

    Time frame: Immediately after intravitreal injection (Day 0)

    Patient-reported pain score measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after the injection procedure, assessed by an independent blinded nurse.

  2. Procedure Duration

    Time frame: During intravitreal injection procedure (Day 0)

    Time in seconds from placement of retraction device (speculum or cotton-tipped applicators) to its removal after needle withdrawal, measured by a blinded circulating nurse using a stopwatch.

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: 15-30 minutes after intravitreal injection (Day 0)

    Total score on a 5-item Likert satisfaction questionnaire (score range 5-25; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction), administered 15-30 minutes after injection.

  4. Procedure-Related Complications

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 1, and Week 4 post-injection

    Incidence of ocular complications including conjunctival hemorrhage, corneal abrasion, vitreous hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and elevated intraocular pressure, assessed at Day 0, Day 1 (phone call), and Week 4.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jakkrit Juhong, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+66816773406

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jakkrit Juhong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Speculum-Free Intravitreal Injection Using Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pain Perception, Procedure Duration, Patient Satisfaction, and Safety Between Eyelid Speculum and Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction Techniques

Acronym: IVI-RETRACT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 18, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.