Russian Cardiology Research and Production Center
Moscow, 121552, Russia
NCT Number: NCT02133807
To evaluate whether specific lipoprotein(a) apheresis on the top of optimal medical therapy could affect atherosclerotic disease burden in coronary and carotid arteries of coronary heart disease patients with elevated Lp(a) levels.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Moscow, 121552, Russia
Following the hypothesis that if Lp(a) excess has a pathogenic role in atherogenesis, then specific elimination of circulating Lp(a) should affect plaque growth and stability, we evaluated the efficacy of Lp(a) apheresis on changes in coronary plaque volume and composition and carotid intima-media thickness in patients with CHD on the background of optimal medical treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Specific Lp(a) apheresis procedures were carried out weekly with "Lp(a) Lipopak" columns (POCARD Ltd., Moscow, Russia) according to the standard protocol
Other names: "Lp(a) Lipopak" immunoadsorption columns
Time frame: From Baseline to End of Study (Week 72)
The absolute change from baseline to 18 months in mean percent diameter stenosis, determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the narrowest lesion in each segment and calculated as: ((reference diameter-minimal lumen diameter (MLD))/reference diameter)x100.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 36 (9 months) and to Week 72 (18 months)
Change from baseline in mean carotid IMT, as measured by duplex ultrasonography of common carotid arteries after 9 and 18 months.
Time frame: From baseline to End of study (Week 72)
Clinically relevant regression or progression was defined as a change from baseline to follow up of ≥10% for percent diameter stenosis
Time frame: From Baseline to End of study (Week 72)
Carotid IMT progression criterion for the 18 months of treatment was considered as growth rate of 0.02 mm (0.015 mm/yr). No changes or reduction in carotid IMT ≥ 0,02 mm served as criterion of stabilization and regression of carotid atherosclerosis, respectively.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 72
TAV at baseline - TAV at Week 72 assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging of a targeted coronary artery
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 72
Mean change in absolute volumes of plaque components: fibrotic, fibrofatty, necrotic core or dense calcium, assessed by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) imaging at baseline and 18 months post-therapy
Time frame: From baseline to Week 72
Mean change in relative amounts of plaque components: fibrotic, fibrofatty, necrotic core or dense calcium, assessed by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) imaging at baseline and 18 months post-therapy
Time frame: From baseline to End of study (Week 72)
Regression was defined as decrease in TAV for all anatomically comparable cross sectional areas of targeted coronary artery from baseline of ≥ 0,1 mm cubed
Time frame: Once a week over 72 week period of active treatment
Difference in Lp(a) concentration before and after specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure calculated as the mean of all measurements
Time frame: from baseline to week 72
To evaluate the impact of the specific Lp(a) removal therapy on the quality of life using Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Exercise stress test as compared with standard guideline-driven medical therapy of CHD patients
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Mean changes in TC level over the 18-month study period
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Mean changes in Lp(a) level over the 18-month study period
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Mean changes in LDL-C level over the 18-month study period
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Since all included patients had high Lp(a) levels, to avoid overestimation of LDL-C fraction estimated LDL-C levels were corrected for cholesterol derived from Lp(a).
Corrected LDL-C (LDL-C corr) was calculated using Dahlen's modification of the Friedewald formula: LDL-C corr = TC - (HDL-C) - (TG / 2.2) - (0.3 x Lp(a) / 38.7).
For values in mmol/L, Lp(a) in mg/dL
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Mean changes in TG level over the 18-month study period
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Mean changes in HDL-C level over the 18-month study period
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Russian Cardiology Research and Production Center
Other
A 72-week, Prospective, Parallel-group, Partially Blinded, Controlled Phase IIIb Study Evaluating the Impact of Specific Lp(a) Apheresis on Atherosclerotic Disease Burden in Coronary Heart Disease Patients With High Lipoprotein(a) Level.
Acronym: LaRCA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00000599
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT00005459
Adnexal Diseases, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT00005134
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT00005696
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial Details