Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03214081

Special Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The drug being tested in this survey is called vonoprazan. Vonoprazan is being tested to treat patients who have reflux esophagitis.

This survey will look at the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings. The survey will enroll approximately 1000 participants.

  • Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg

This multi-center observational trial will be conducted in Japan.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants who require maintenance therapy for relapsed/recurrent reflux esophagitis

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants meeting the criteria of grade A to D according to the Los Angeles classification (Hoshihara's modification), by means of endoscopy at the initiation of maintenance therapy with vonoprazan tablets
  • Participants with a previous history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in vonoprazan tablets
  • Participants taking atazanavir sulfate or rilpivirine hydrochloride

Treatment and study plan

Vonoprazan

Drug

Vonoprazan tablets

Other names: Takecab tablets, TAK-438

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Endoscopic Relapse Rate

    Time frame: From the initiation of the maintenance therapy to Month 12 (or discontinuation of the therapy), up to 12 months

    Endoscopic relapse rate was defined as a percentage of participants who met the criteria of Grade A to D in the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification. The modified LA classification graded endoscopic findings as follows- Grade N: normal mucosa; Grade M: minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity; Grade A: non-confluent mucosal breaks <5 mm in length; Grade B: nonconfluent mucosal breaks ≥ 5 mm in length; Grade C: confluent mucosal breaks <75% circumferential; Grade D: confluent mucosal breaks >=75% circumferential.

  2. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Heartburn

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe heartburn at each time points were reported.

  3. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Acid Reflux

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe acid reflux at each time points were reported.

  4. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Postprandial Fullness

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe postprandial fullness at each time points were reported.

  5. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Early Satiation

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe early satiation at each time points were reported.

  6. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric Pain

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric pain at each time points were reported.

  7. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric Burning

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric burning at each time points were reported.

  8. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Abdominal Bloating

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe abdominal bloating at each time points were reported.

  9. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Nausea/Vomiting

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe nausea/vomiting at each time points were reported.

  10. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Belching

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe belching at each time points were reported.

  11. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Anorexia

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe anorexia at each time points were reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Takeda

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Special Drug Use Surveillance of Takecab Tablets for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 11, 2017
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.