University Hospital Toulouse
Toulouse, 31052, France
NCT Number: NCT03453008
Following a stroke , 55% of the patients do not recover any traction of the upper limb and 30% a residual motricity not allowing a functional grip. For this last group of patients, there are major therapeutic issues to restore a functional grip.
The aim of the study is to relieved the spastic cocontractions before and after usual injection of botulinum toxin A at stroke patient.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Toulouse, 31052, France
Descriptive study of spastic cocontraction index before and after botulinum toxin A injections during active elbow extension in chronic vascular hemiplegic patients.
The spastic cocontraction score will be compared between T1 (before the Botulinum toxin A injection) and T2 (4 weeks after the botulinum toxin A injection in the elbow flexors).
There is no control group. The patient is his own witness: the non-paretic side is considered as the physiological reference in terms of the level of spastic cocontractions.
Botulinum toxin A injections are performed in routine clinical practice in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, following the recommendations in force. This treatment has been shown to be effective on spasticity in several high-level studies. The reduction of spasticity, evaluated clinically (Tardieu and Ashworth scale), is a criterion of efficacy of botulinum toxin A injections.
The evaluation of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin A injections on the other components of muscular hyperactivity, such as the reduction of spastic cocontraction during active movements, is poorly performed in clinical and clinical research. This protocol includes specific assessments to evaluate the evolution of spastic cocontraction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two evaluations before the toxin injection (T0 and T1), to quantify cocontractions and to determine the toxin injection pattern.
The first evaluation (T0) will be carried out within a period of between 1 month and 15 days before the injection. This evaluation makes it possible to pose the indication for the realization of injection of Botulinum Toxin A (TBA).
The second evaluation (T1) will be performed on the day of the injection to specify the muscle targets to be injected.
The first evaluation is a Clinical evaluation and second is Instrumental evaluation
Time frame: 2 hours
Measurement of spastic cocontraction index during active elbow extension, obtained from the electromyography signal of the extensor and flexor muscles of the elbow paretic side, between T1 and T2 (before / after the injection of Botulinum Toxin A).
Time frame: 2 hours
The Erasmus Modified Nottingham Assessment (EmNSA), validated in English, allows a comprehensive evaluation of the superficial epicritic, proprioceptive sensitivity and stereognosis of the entire upper limb in the hemiplegic patient.
Time frame: 2 hours
Held and Pierrot-Deseilligny scale, which abstracts from the notions of gravity and range of motion.
Time frame: 2 hours
It is evaluated by the Tardieu scale. The analysis will consist of studying the evolution of the muscular reaction and its angle of onset (Tardieu scale) during each of the clinical evaluations.
Time frame: 2 hours
Limitation of Active Motion Angle (LAMA) is the clinical measure of the consequences of a spastic cocontraction in a patient. To calculate it, we subtract the maximum elbow extension angle obtained during the PASSIVE stretch of the muscles at the maximum elbow extension angle obtained during a voluntary ACTIVE contraction. As part of the protocol, the LAMA will be instrumentally measured with the 3D kinematic system (Optitrack).
This data is expressed in gross value (in degrees) or in percentage (depending on the maximum amplitude obtained during passive stretching).
Time frame: 2 hours
The Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Assessment (FMA-Motor), based on the motor recovery scheme described by Brunnstrom (1975), is a scale of evaluation of voluntary reference motor function in the cerebral adult, often used in research and development in clinical practice. The FMA-Motor part of the upper limb is rated 66. It has high validity, reliability and sensitivity to change.
Time frame: 2 hours
Functional abilities with the Wolf Motor Function Test validated in more than 16 languages (including French) since 2013, is a standardized scale evaluating upper limb capacities in cerebral palsy adults. Originally designed by Steven Wolf (1987) to quantify the effects of stress-induced therapy, this tool is often used in research protocols in the acute and chronic phase brain. The scale consists of performing 17 standardized tests, classified in order of increasing complexity, which solicit the proximal joints
University Hospital, Toulouse
Other
Study of Spastic Cocontractions and Limitation of Active Movements of the Upper Limb Before and After Treatment During Injection of Botulinum Toxin in Patients After Stroke
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05241457
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Schenectady, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03645122
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02476396
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Brain Diseases
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04597658
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details