U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center
Beltsville, Maryland, 20705, United States
NCT Number: NCT07146958
The goal of the study is to determine the likability of seeds incorporated into lunch foods. The study will provide a better understanding of ways to make recipe alterations that may promote health and fullness.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
25 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beltsville, Maryland, 20705, United States
The objective of this study is to investigate the likability and potential satisfying effects of seed-enhanced foods. Seed consumption, owing to its high nutritional and functional characteristics, has become popular in recent years. Chia seeds, tiny edible seeds also known as Salvia hispanica L., are derived from a plant of the Lamiaceae family that grows in arid or semiarid climates. Hemp seeds are derived from the hemp plant Cannabis sativa. Although these seeds may seem different in appearance and taste, they share many similarities regarding their nutritional/health benefits. These seeds are a rich source of essential fatty acids (omega-3 and omega-6) and antioxidants. In addition, both chia and hemp seeds are sources of plant-based protein. Seeds also contain dietary fiber, which is essential to keep the digestive system healthy. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that adults consume 22-34 grams of fiber daily depending on age and sex. However, more than 90% of women and 97% of men do not meet the recommended fiber intake. Several studies in the past have shown the beneficial impact of supplementation with high-fiber foods exerting positive effects on appetite control and short-term satiety. Chia seeds are rich in soluble fiber that helps to lower cholesterol and delay starch digestion potentially impacting appetite and satiety. Various studies have reported the beneficial effects of chia seed consumption on cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Only a few studies have been conducted to investigate the satiating effects of chia or hemp seeds. These studies have mostly examined the influence of chia seed or hemp seeds as a mid-morning snack on short-term satiety and energy intake. No studies have examined how the use of chia or hemp seeds as a lunch meal ingredient could impact satiety. Therefore, the main objective of the present study is to investigate likability and potential satisfying effects of seed-enhanced foods.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-
Exclusion criteria
Chia seeds will be added to soup and bread recipes.
Hemp seeds will be added to soup and bread recipes.
The placebo will be food items that are not enriched with the intervention products.
Time frame: 30 minutes after the start of the intervention
Mass of food eaten at lunch, weighed in grams
Time frame: 30 minutes post treatment
Visual Analogue Scale assessment of hunger, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more hungry. To answer the question "How hungry do you feel?" one end of the line will be labeled "I am not hungry at all" and the other end of the line will be labeled "I have never been more hungry." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of meal satisfaction, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more satisfied. To answer the question "How satisfied do you feel?" one end of the line will be labeled "I am completely empty" and the other end of the line will be labeled "I cannot eat another bite." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of fullness, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more full. To answer the question "How full do you feel?" one end of the line will be labeled "Not at all full" and the other end of the line will be labeled "Totally full." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of ability to consume more food, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more able to eat more food. To answer the question "How much do you think you can eat?" one end of the line will be labeled "Nothing at all" and the other end of the line will be labeled "A lot." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of desire to consume something sweet, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more greater desire to eat something sweet. To answer the question "Would you like to eat something sweet?" one end of the line will be labeled "Yes, very much" and the other end of the line will be labeled "No, not at all." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of desire to consume something salty, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more greater desire to eat something salty. To answer the question "Would you like to eat something salty?" one end of the line will be labeled "Yes, very much" and the other end of the line will be labeled "No, not at all." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of desire to consume something savory, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more greater desire to eat something savory. To answer the question "Would you like to eat something savory?" one end of the line will be labeled "Yes, very much" and the other end of the line will be labeled "No, not at all." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Visual analogue scale assessment of desire to consume something fatty, assessed by participants placing a mark on a line, measured as millimeters across the line, with larger values meaning more greater desire to eat something fatty. To answer the question "Would you like to eat something fatty?" one end of the line will be labeled "Yes, very much" and the other end of the line will be labeled "No, not at all." This question is part of a validated ingestive behavior questionnaire.
USDA Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center
Fed
Voluntary Intake of Seed Enhanced Lunch Foods
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07114991
Behavior, Body Weight
River Falls, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07180446
Behavior, Body Weight
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07180147
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer Disease (AD)
Arlington, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07258732
Body Weight, Constipation
Olsztyn, Poland
View Trial Details